ZTE Axon 11 (SD765G) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (SD845) By SpeedTest G

By SpeedTest G
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
ZTE Axon 11 (SD765G) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (SD845)

There is a general idea that today's uh mid-range devices are the equivalent of the flagships of two years ago. Today, we're going to be testing the snapdragon 765 in the at action 11, with the Galaxy Note 9, which has the flagship snapdragon 845 from 2018, so which one do you think's going to win. Well, let's find out. We have the ZTE or the at axon 11, on the left hand, side with the snapdragon 765 g and of course that is a one plus six setup. So it's got two high performance cores quarters, a76 one clocked higher than the other and then six quarters a55 cause on the right hand, side. We have the Galaxy Note 9 with the snapdragon 845.

This is a 2018 premium, premiere flagship device and, of course, you've got four quarters a75 cores, so one generation before the cores that you find in the 765g and then four corners, a55 cores, and then we'll talk about the GPU differences later when we get to that part of the test and as I've said that I can see it's a slight lead there by the uh action 11, it's the first into the 16 thread test. It's interesting that the Galaxy Note 9 has a maximum clock, speed of 2.8 gigahertz compared to just 2.4 gigahertz for that one prime core in the snapdragon 765 g. So as I'm saying that the action 11 is now first into the Blair test, the first into the mixed CPU GPU part of this test run, and only now is the note 9 going into it. So um, it's looking pretty good for the axon 11 right now. If you had to choose between buying a snapdragon, 765 phones or a snapdragon 845 phones from two years ago.

It looks at the moment. Let's see what the frame rate looks at the moment that I would go with the 765. I look at the frame right now. What's it going to be, on the left hand, side 19 frames, a second 19 frames, a second for the snapdragon 765g as it's the first intuitive test. We're going to see a frame right now on the right hand, side.

What's that going to become on, was it going to be 14 frames? Oh, quite a difference there, like not so good. For the Galaxy Note 9 as already the axon 11, is halfway through the UT test, and only now the note 9 is starting using this, but there we go. It's just started this run now. So that's quite a difference, quite a lead now by the axon. But of course we have the arena 630 on the right hand, side and the arena 620 on the left-hand side, so the arena 630 should be the better GPU.

Can it catch up? Will it be able to make up any grounds against the actual 11 at this point, as it's already into the unreal test? But so now is the note 9 into the unreal test. The question is: can it really zip through this forest? It's doing quite well. I think it's doing quite well, but the question will it get there before? Will it get to the end before the action 11 of the snapdragon 765 g? No, it won't two minutes 15 seconds on my left hand, side and there we go 2 minutes 18.1 on the right. Okay, let's break down those scores and see exactly what happened. Okay, so as we saw there, a win for the uh snapdragon 765 g in the uh action, 11 two minutes 15 seconds on the nose and then uh 3.1 seconds later came in the Galaxy Note 9 with two minutes 18.1. But we look at the CPU time.

We can see that it's 54.4 versus one minute, uh 0.6 seconds, so that is a 6.2 second advantage to the axiom 11. So it looks like that quarters, a76 cores, two of them clocks and lower clock, speed and four quarters. A75 cores actually gives a better CPU performance. Then we get to the mixed CPU, GPU, 29.5 versus 34.1. Again, a 4.6 difference, uh second difference there in favor of the x11, but when we get to the GPU everything change rounds, we've got the arena 630 in the Galaxy Note 9 on the arena 620 in the x11, as you can see, 51 seconds for the action in the snapdragon 765g, whereas it's 43.3 seconds for the snapdragon 845 with the better GPU, but it wasn't quite enough to bring back those losses in the CPU and mixed time. So, overall, the axion1 with two minutes 15.1 minus Gary sims. This is speedy.

I really hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please do give it a thumbs up, and if you like this kind of videos, well, we've got a whole community here. Why not stick around by subscribing to the channel? Okay? That's it I'll see you in the next one.


Source : SpeedTest G

Phones In This Article




Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu