Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy A71 By DEVICE BATTLES

By DEVICE BATTLES
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy A71

Device BATTLES PRESENTS Samsung Galaxy A52 versus... ,... versus, Samsung, Galaxy, A71, BODY, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 COLORS 4 Colors: Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome, Blue, vs, 4, Colors:, Prism, Crush, Black, Prism, Crush, Silver, Prism, Crush, Blue, Prism, Crush, Pink, DIMENSIONS, 159.9, mm, 75.1, mm, 8.4 mm vs, 163.6 mm, 76 mm, 7.7 mm WEIGHT, 189 grams vs, 179 grams BODY MATERIALS Plastic back, Plastic frame, vs Plastic back, Plastic frame, WATER RESISTANT, IP67 Up to 1?m /, 30, mins, vs, Not, Declared, DISPLAY, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 DISPLAY TYPE Super, AMOLED, 715, nits, Max, Brightness, vs, Super, AMOLED, Plus, 665, nits, Max, Brightness, DISPLAY, SIZE, 6.5, inches vs, 6.7, inches DISPLAY, RESOLUTION, 1080 x, 2400, pixels, vs, 1080, x, 2400, pixels, DISPLAY, ASPECT, RATIO, 20:9, vs, 20:9, DISPLAY, PIXEL, DENSITY, 407, PPI, vs, 393, PPI, DISPLAY, TO, BODY, RATIO, 84.1%, vs, 87.2%, DISPLAY, REFRESH, RATE, 90Hz, vs, 60, Hz, DISPLAY, PROTECTION, Gorilla, Glass, 5, vs, Gorilla, Glass, 3, CAMERA, Samsung, Galaxy, A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 MAIN, CAMERA, 64, MP, f/1.8, Sony, IMX682, vs, 64, MP, f/1.8, Samsung, S5KGW1, ULTRA, WIDE, CAMERA, 12, MP, f/2.2, vs, 12, MP, f/2.2, MACRO, CAMERA 5 MP, f/2.4 vs 5 MP, f/2.4, DEPTH, SENSOR, 5, MP, f/2.4, vs, 5, MP, f/2.2, FLASH, LED, Flash, vs, LED, Flash, VIDEO, MAX, RESOLUTION, 4K@30fps, Stabilization:, GYRO-EIS, vs, 4K@30fps, Stabilization:, GYRO-EIS, SLOW, MOTION, VIDEO, 720p@240fps, 1080p@120fps, vs, 720p@240fps, 1080p@120fps, SELFIE, CAMERA, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 SELFIE CAMERA, RESOLUTION, 32, MP, f/2.2, vs, 32, MP, f/2.2, SELFIE, VIDEO, MAX, RESOLUTION, 4K, 2160p@30fps, vs, 4K, 2160p@30fps, HARDWARE, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 CHIPSET Snapdragon, 720G, (8, nm), vs, Snapdragon, 730, (8, nm), CPU, 2x2.3, GHz, 6x1.8, GHz, vs, 2x2.2, GHz, 6x1.8, GHz, GPU, Arena, 618, vs, Arena, 618, RAM, 4/8?GB, LPDDR4, vs, 6/8?GB, LPDDR4, INTERNAL, STORAGE, 128?GB, 256?GB, UFS, 2.1, vs, 128?GB, UFS, 2.1, EXTERNAL, STORAGE, Up to 1024 GB, Shared, SIM, Slot, vs, Up to 512 GB Dedicated, Slot, FINGERPRINT, ON, SCREEN, Optical, vs, ON, SCREEN, Optical, OPERATING, SYSTEM, Android, 11, One, UI, 3.1, vs, Android, 11, One, UI, 3.1, BATTERY, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 BATTERY CAPACITY, 4, 500, mAh, Type:, Li-Po, Non-removable, vs, 4500, mAh, Type:, Li-Ion, Non-removable, FAST, CHARGING, 25W 100% in 90, min Reverse:, No, vs, 25W 100% in 81, min Reverse:, No, WEB, BROWSING, Up to 14:40 hours, vs Up to 13:20 hours, VIDEO, PLAYBACK, Up to 14:00 hours, vs Up to 17:50 hours, OTHER, FEATURES, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 MULTIMEDIA Speakers, Jack, 3.5, mm, FM, Radio, Infrared, Port, USB, CONNECTIVITY, Network, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, NFC, SIM & SENSORS, SIM Type, Dual, SIM, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Proximity, Barometer... , TESTS, Samsung, Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 SAR 0.35, W/kg, (head), 0.84, W/kg, (body), vs, 0.51, W/kg, (head), 1.56, W/kg, (body), LOUDSPEAKER, -27.0, LUIS, (Good), vs, -29.0, LUIS, (Average), ASTUTE, BENCHMARK, RESULTS, 261, 280, (v8), vs, 263, 396, (v8), BACKBENCH, RESULTS, 1, 577, (v5.1), vs, 1, 733, (v5.1), FRENCH, RESULTS, 15fps, (ES, 3.1, onscreen), vs, 15fps, (ES, 3.1, onscreen), PRICE, Samsung, Galaxy, A52 and Samsung Galaxy A71 LOWEST, PRICE, $360, 128?GB, 6?GB, vs, $350, 128?GB, 6?GB, RESULT, Strengths of Each Phone Samsung, Galaxy, A52:, Dimensions, Main, Camera, Display, Refresh, Rate, Water, Resistant, Stereo, Speakers. , Samsung, Galaxy, A71:, Price, Display, Size, Weight, Dedicated, SD, Slot, FM, Radio. , Have, anything to add? Which one.

Do you like more? Please, drop, a comment. Like, Subscribe, Bell, Share!.


Source : DEVICE BATTLES

Phones In This Article



Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu