Galaxy S20 Ultra vs S10 Lite: Is Super Steady OIS Better? By Jonathan Casey

What's up everybody, my name is Jonathan Casey. Welcome back to the channel. If you're new here welcome today we're going to be comparing the software enabled variant of super steady stabilization on the galaxy s 22. The hardware super steady stabilization on the galaxy s, 10 light for those of you that don't know the galaxy s 10 light has a brand-new OS system. That Samsung is calling super. Steady is supposed to deliver similar results.

The e is on other Galaxy devices, but without the issues that come with, E is like the strange, warping or terrible low light results for those of you that don't know the difference between oh is and E is. Let me quickly explain an is done through software, while also utilizing information from your phone's gyroscope. For the most part it works well, but it has some limitations as well as reliability. Issues Oh is done on a hardware level where the sensor or lens optics are made to move around freely to follow the movements in order to deliver a stabilized image. This doesn't depend on the camera, software or device processor in the same way as E is, so it's not going to have the same limitations.

One thing to note is that when e is works, the way that it should the results can potentially be better than IS. However, this goes back to the consistency and reliability issues that I previously mentioned, since you honestly never know how it's going to perform. Also, it's important to note that the Galaxy S 10 light is able to utilize super steady Elias, even in 4k ever since the most recent February patch update at the time of this video, the S 10 light is the only smartphone and Samsung's lineup that can shoot 4k super steady video to me this is impressive, given that the S 10 light is a sub 600 hours smartphone. So with that out of the way, let's test out these two phones and see which one comes out on top alright, so this is the first test. This is no super study on the galaxy s 20, which the galaxy s 20 is over here on the right and the galaxy s.10 light is over here on the Left I'm. Just doing a quick little walking test.

Usually walking is what trips up super study, because it's all done through software, and this gives you an example of what the stabilization is going to look like just without any kind of software enhance mints or anything like that, and from what I am seeing the galaxy s, 20 ultra is looking to be more stable than the s10 light, despite the S 10 light having the new, updated stabilization system. So now we're going to progress into a little run here, and we're going to see what this is all about. Another thing to add is that both of these phones are in 4k. So that's why the crop is kind of bad I'm. Going to turn around run back Italy, all right so now, I have super steady.

Electronic stabilization turned on the galaxy s 20 ultra over here, whereas the S 10 light is still using the hardware super steady. So this is the actual test that I really wanted to see. You could definitely see a difference in the crop here, because again, the F 10 light is in 4k, whereas the s 20 ultra is now in 1080p, because super steady is not supported in higher resolutions like quad, HD and 4k, so go ahead and do the walk, and then we'll progress to a run. Usually walking is what trips up the digital stabilization or super steady, but from what I'm, seeing its doing pretty good one thing I did notice was that, even though the S 10 light is using Hardware stabilization, some reason when I was watching the video back. It was a lot smoother than what I'm seeing like in Live View.

Now, let's go ahead and progress to a run turn around run back all right. So this is the last test in daylight. I'm going to go into low-light and do some more testing here in a minute, but I have super steady, turned on the galaxy s.20 ultra and super steady software turned on the s 10 light. So this is not only using the hardware version of super study, but now it's using the software version, which is why it's defaulted to 1080p, so the crop is a little less we're going to go ahead and progress to a run. Now you guys, let me know which one looks better to you in terms of stabilization.

I know that s 10 light is doing this weird flicker thing as the stabilization works, which is uh, really unfortunate, go ahead and turn around run back and yes, I am really out of shape. I, look like a walrus with some tennis shoes on trying to run out SeaWorld alright. So we are in a tunnel a little of a lower lit situation. I'm going to walk down to the end of the tunnel, while I explain what's going on here, so we have super steady, turned on the s20 ultra on the s10 lights, we're only using the hardware version of super study and a lot of the times, because super study uses software, algorithms and low light. It gets tripped up and that's when you end up with a lot of like wobbling and stuff like that, so I'm going to run down the tunnel, and we're going to see if the super steady software trips up at all right, and we'll run back all right.

So now super study is turned on both bones in terms of software stabilization. So now this is going to be a test on whether both systems get tripped up, despite the S 10 light using hardware and software now. But another thing to keep in mind is that, even though the s 20 ultra isn't using super steady hardware, it still does have stabilization. It's just not Samsung's newest version of stabilization. All right can I get a thumbs up for doing this cos got all mighty high amount of shame all right.

Let's go all right run back you all didn't know that Shame could run. Did you as that Shame running for you, based off of what I'm seeing the Galaxy S 20 retains the better variant of stabilization, even when not using super steady, electronic stabilization, the Galaxy S ten light not only is less stable, but it has this weird flickering issue that causes the exposure to change every time there was a sudden bouncing movement when both phones are using the software version, a super steady they both performed great? However, the ESSTIN light continues to do this weird flickering issue, which makes the footage almost unusable in a lower lit situation. The ESSTIN light performs slightly better, but not so much because it's more stable, it's more about the footage having less wobbling and pulsing as seen on the s20 ultra. Even when both software versions of super steady are turned on. The s20 ultra presents more of the wobbling that you get from traditional AIs versus the s10 light.

I'm, definitely happy to see Samsung trying something new here, but I think the super steady hardware stabilization on the s10 light needs quite a bit of work. It's great for static, handheld shooting and since it supports 4k, you will get a sharper image as you can see, but considering Samsung has given this o AYA system, the name Super steady, I think it's a bit misleading until they tweaked the way the system works, as well as fixing the flickering issue. That I was having it's hard to see this being a newer form of oh, is and better versus. What's already been implemented on the note 10 s 10 and s 20. What do you think of the new hardware base super steady stabilization? Let me know down below in the comment section if you enjoyed this video, consider giving it a thumbs up.

Also, let me know if you want to see a full comparison between these two phones, and I'll. Definitely get on that and other than that. I'll talk to you beautiful people in the next video.

Source : Jonathan Casey