Worth the Upgrade? / Samsung Galaxy S20 vs S10e Camera Comparison! By Daniel Sin

Today we're gonna, compare the Samsung as 10e versus the s20, and this is gonna, be my last official video with the s10 a few guys I have to trade, this in to get some trading credit for the s20. So this is the Lola test of the front-facing camera and one of the biggest things about, or one of the biggest difference is basically the telephoto lens. So that's one thing that s10 II does not have over the estimate alright, and this is how it looks like when it's really dark without any major city lights. So, let's move on to the next section. Alright, we want you to portion what first the biggest thing I noticed is: I can actually zoom in on s xx, and that goes the same with the front facing camera on s xx as well, because I can actually zoom out using my focus mode on s, 10 II. It won't.

Let me now is it worth upgrading to get this feature, and it depends on how you like to approach more pictures. One thing I do know is if I'm taking a picture in portrait mode using just a white lens, especially a person up close, it's gonna, look really weird or disoriented. So that's why I do like having to tell a photo option to give a more compressed background. Look to actually make it look like an actual portrait picture for HDR I would go with the s20, because if you look at the sky, you can see the blue, whereas on SNE is only white even for indoors, as twenty does a better job, exposing the highlights. So there is a lot of improvements here in portrait mode.

You have to move around until your screen says, ready and in terms of just picking up two cutouts of objects in people. I didn't really notice. If the s 20 is amazingly faster than as 10 so in terms of performance, it seems really similar for everyday situations. Here's what you're going to see ultra-wide regular wide 3, X, 8, X and 30x and I will say that s.20 is the obvious winner, because you do have the telephoto lens. So if we're zooming in especially at 3x and then 8 X, it's going to be more clear on s 20 and with testimony you can also zoom all the way up to 30x, and at that point the image is not gonna.

Look really clear or crispy. It's just something nice to have and I, don't think a lot of people would actually use the 30 X on ESTA neat. The Mexican zoom in is it X, so I do the same thing with s 20 and of course, as you can tell that s, 20 is the winner here. So if you do like zooming in into your pictures, or you find yourself zooming in a lot, you will see the upgrade when you get the new phone in terms of HDR I feel like they're, both about the same sometimes that s 20 seems to do better and sometimes 10 seems to do better. So I think is a hit or miss or is just really random, but nonetheless, I feel like they're just equally about the same in terms of color.

I feel like the s20 is a little more saturated in the oranges blues and reds just slightly, but not too overboard. I think it's just enough to where it makes your pictures look a bit more punchy but, as we all know, Sam some pictures are already saturated now. Moving on to low light, I feel like most of it is really similar. Of course, the biggest difference is telephoto as I'm zooming in into 3x +, 8 X. Of course, you're going to see the s22 be more crispy, you can see less noise and artifacts and, of course, I've showed ? 30 X just to let you see how it looks like in low-light situations, so even in low-light, if you're zooming in or use the telephoto a lot.

This is a definite upgrade from the s10 II. If you find yourself not zooming in and you're just using ultra-wide and regular wide I, don't really think it's really worth it. One thing: I do notice, shooting ultra white in low-light. The images are slightly greener. Also, the billboard on right is more visible or readable on as 20, so it seems to have better control on highlights on s.20 I feel like it's just little things that they're improving, not by a milestone. Where is really noticeable, but you just have to look for it now.

Moving on to night mode, I was at s.20 is better in terms of brightness, but sometimes they do add a bit of the green, where it kind of feels like a force, and it doesn't look too good, that's more in a city situation where there's still a bunch of lights to the point where you don't really need night mode, but if you're in an area where there's basically no light at all, then this is where you see the brighter picture on the s20, and sometimes I feel like it's also a bit more clear. This is the point where I noticed just taking a regular photo on s.20 is a bit slower and if you switch to night mode, I would have to wait. Maybe a second or so until I see the timer on the right. The lower right to actually know when the night mode is ready, so taking really, really low light pictures on s 28. The performance is pretty slow for my taste, but I do like how there's a time right now to let me know how long I need to hold the picture for, and there is like this sort of timer animation on the shutter button.

The s20 does have this new mode called the single take. So here are all the options that they gave me using that mode, and it's not only pictures. They also record video, so you're going to see the full clip of the whole length of what we did on top of their own little spin as well. I also tried it during nighttime as well, and I realized that I didn't get as many options. I had 1213 a time, and now I have five during nighttime, but I will do a more in-depth video of using just single take throughout my day to see if it's really useful, if you're on vacation or in your touristy area, so hit subscribe.

If you don't want to miss that video now moving on to the video portion in 4k ultra-wide, the stabilization seems really similar. The difference here are the colors on s. Tiny everything seems to be a bit more saturated, especially in the brown. So you can tell that it's really popping out, and it's kind of dark as well. That's Toni does have a flatter profile look and if you're looking into the shadows or darker areas, you can tell that it's easier to see now.

Moving on to the main camera lines, everything I said about the ultra wide-angle seems to be the same here so without wasting more time. Let's move on to the next one on as techno I assumed in 3x just to match what the s20 s telephoto lens and, as you can tell, the s20 is the winner. But if you really look at the background on s xx, you can kind of see a little of that background. Blur the same thing or the same concept you get with the DSLR. Next up is 4k.60S 20 does offer stabilization. So here is the biggest difference between the two and the colors still apply.

Destiny does have a bit more saturation than as 20. Now we're moving on to 4k versus AKR, these phones and I. When I first recorded a K on s, 20, everything on the screen is pretty choppy things moving around like these cars seem to skip as I'm recording, especially if I'm panning around as well, so I thought that it wasn't. It wouldn't be that good when I'm, watching it back or when I'm recording, but now that I'm looking on my computer screen, everything seems to be pretty good. It stabilized the colors are still pretty flat, which I do prefer, so I'm.

Obviously, going to do a case of pneumatic, so we're going to see more samples of that white as first impressions. I am pretty impressed a quick test on an ultra, steady mode. Everything seems to be similar. Nothing really has changed here from what I can see now. Moving on to low-light in ultra white is not the best to shoot at, but it seems to me that the stabilization is still the white balance is much better on, as twenty everything seems to be correct unless green, but on as twenty it seems, I can see more of the artifacts.

If I look at the bottom of the screen, I can see that purple and green noise showing up now when it gets brighter. It's gone once I get into the darker spots. It starts to show up again and on as 10e I don't really see. Much of that is just consistently noisy for the main lens. Everything seems about the same, of course, the colors it's slightly different, but for stabilization, the micro jitters everything seems to be identical for the zoom in / telephoto lens.

It seems to me that the s20 is clear and looks more natural, whereas sun has 10, it looks a bit more digital, but there is more noise on s24 k60 tests. Of course, you will see my Crusaders on s 20, because it's stabilized so having these two side-by-side during nighttime is a good example of why unstable footage looks cleaner versus stabilized shooting a key in low-light is not gonna, be as clean I do find myself losing focus a lot and, of course, you see a lot of artifacts, especially if we look up in the sky. Now. This isn't a big surprise to me, because I already expected that it's not gonna, look as good in low light for a K, so I would just stick with shooting in daylight only so that is my comparison between the new s, 20 and older, as 10 II. So I do like having a telephoto lens, especially if I'm shooting portrait pictures, the HDR is a bit better in portrait mode and the colors I would say, stand out a bit more, so is it worth upgrade? That really depends on you.

If you want to see more as 20 content and camera comparisons, please subscribe. Follow me on Instagram, give a like hit the bell, and thanks for watching.

Source : Daniel Sin