Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Vs Mi 10 Camera Comparison By TechTablets

So recently I just posted my review in comparison of the meaty and Pro up against the meat ten, and I decided to make a separate video that will actually contain some of what I compared with the camera. So this camera comparison, we're gonna, take a look and see if there's eight element lenses on the main camera versus the seven element. Lens is going to make a big difference with low-light performance and even in daytime stills right now, you're, looking at course at the front-facing camera, as you can see, there's a difference here in quality in exposure I find that it's over exposing more actually on the meat improve. So this is just down to softly because it got the same highway with the front-facing cameras. Now obvious, it is a big difference, but the rear cameras when it comes to two times optical zoom, for your portraits and in the five times optical. So we'll take a look at that and then macro you get macro with the ultra-wide.

The 20 megapixel altar wide with the 10 Pro sees, is it does have a better camera setup, but just how much better is what we'll find out in this camera comparison. This is ultra-wide video elbow further and stabilization is very good. Perhaps maybe a little more details, maybe slight difference because of increased megapixel count on the team pro here with the ultra-wide cameras. Stability on both is very good. Let's pan around here, you do see some noticeable stutter on them, which is not great I'm, seeing this also on other phones as well with electronic image stabilization, so the rear cameras they a hundred and eight megapixels, and they're both identical here I've noticed.

The stabilization on both seems to be pretty much equal as you'd expect to be the same here now they focus. We do have that IR infrared assisted focus on the pro model. I might actually sing too much of a difference between that and the normal model. I mean it could be slightly better, but I'm not really seeing it now, once you start recording in 4k 30 frames per second here or ACTE, or even 4k 60. You cannot swap over to the ultra-wide or two times or anything.

Won't let you do that. Hopefully they can change that with a firmware update so now with a super, steady mode and ever I'm going to wrap the stairs here, and you can see it's quite speedy, but still not quite as good as the Samsung Galaxy S 10, plus that I have make sure you check my comparison against the 10 in the STM plus to see the difference there and the super steady modes I like 4k 30 frames per second, so the Sun just said it actually looks a lot brighter than it really is and stabilization on both for them yeah. It does not look as good, of course now, because these conditions are difficult, even with a hundred and eight megapixel sensor ultra-wide, it looks like the pro might actually capture a tiny bit more light to me. When you look in the distance there, you can see the mass of the boats where it's very hard or harder to make out on the standard meet In you so just to summarize here that, yes, you definitely get much more flexibility with the meter and pros cameras, of course, because you've got the two times optical. That is great for portraits getting in close to giving much more detail and the photos just generally look better.

Never the main sense I can see, there's actually a bit of a difference now, I, don't know whether it's just because of software or it's the difference in the lens. The higher quality lens and the medium Pro could be. The reason why we get more details, but I think it's more on the software side of things. It just seems to be a little more tweet there now front-facing cameras, they're, both quite poor, actually I, think, especially with video, because you don't have any electronic image stabilization, and that is a real shame. I hope that show me does add this in a future up-and-coming firmware update.

Now there is apparently an update on March, the fifth coming to even make the cameras better more than what they are right now, and I will probably take another look at them again when that is out. So let me know in the comments which one you think was actually better than in low-light. I. Think the clear winner is actually the team, Pro ? in terms the low-light is seemed to get just more details and capture even more on the shadows than just the standard version, but is it worth that extra I think it is if you're going to be using the ultra-wide camera, the portrait camera and that five times optical all the time? But if you don't plan to use the cameras that much you don't take a lot of portrait shots then still save you money and just go with the standard me 10 Editions.

Source : TechTablets