Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Galaxy S10 Lite Camera Comparison By TechwithUsama

Welcome to the much-awaited camera comparison between the Samsung Galaxy s in light and again XE s, everyone, many of you were confused between these phones and this video will help you choose a device that suits you the best now. This is a very long. Video and I have worked really, really hard for this one. So if you are new here, it would be massively appreciated it if you can hit that subscribe button and press the bell icon and if you like this video at some point, do hit the thumbs up button too as a light. First, it has three cameras at the back. The main camera is a forty-eight megapixels Sony I am x58 six sensors.

It's got a 12 megapixels ultra-wide camera and a five megapixels macro camera on the front. ? and light has a Sony I am at six. Sixteen thirty-two megapixel sensor, this camera setup, combined with the snapdragon 855, has one of the best image processing technologies available to date. The 71, on the other hand, has full real cameras. It's got a 5, megapixel steps, and so first, next to that is a 64 megapixel.

Sampson Wright is Bocelli gw1 sensor after that is a 12 megapixels ultra-wide camera, and then there is a 5 megapixels macro camera. It shares a front camera with the Galaxy S n light. It's the same: 32 megapixel, Sony, Rx, 6 16 sensors on the front in this comparison, I have taken pictures in all the modes. Pictures were taken in different environments and the pictures were short only in the modes that are common on both the phones let's get into it. Now here is a very first picture of this comparison.

I am comparing the ultra-wide to Chile on the Samsung, galaxy, 71 and ? in light now, first, you can see that the 70 once picture is slightly towards the blue side. The sky is not as great as it is on the Samsung Galaxy s, 10 light. Also, the dynamic range of the Samsung Galaxy s turn light seems slightly better right now. Furthermore, when we zoom in and see, we can find that ? turn light is delivering better details than the Samsung Galaxy a 71. This is a normal mode, which is a phase 2 for mode on both the phones.

Now, once again, you can see that the galaxy is everyone is delivering a brighter picture. The picture on the cell light has a very subtle loop. The picture looks very well-balanced. It has a cool tone and the picture on the a71 has a warm tone. Now.

This is the same picture form the sixty-four megapixels mode of the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 and the 48 megapixels mode of the Samsung Galaxy s, 10 light. Now, despite having a bigger picture, the galaxy, a 71 is not managing the details very well. On the other side, you can see that the details are way ahead on the Samsung Galaxy s in light now this is a life focused picture from both the phones and, once again, I am fighting the saturation petal on the Samsung Galaxy s. In light, my face has a slightly red tint on it, which is making my skin look very natural, while the galaxy a 71 has just made it to white. It's not this fight.

Now in real now, we do know that both phones have a camera that can capture very, very big pictures. We are going to take a look at more 64 megapixels versus of 48 megapixel pictures. Now, first, here is this piece front. You can now see that the dynamic range on both the phones is not very good. You cannot look through these gaps on these phones.

I am finding it better on the Samsung Galaxy a 71. Now the pictures are extremely detailed on both the phones. There are no compromises on the details here. This is now the same picture from the 16 megapixels mode of the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 and the 12 megapixels mode off the Samsung Galaxy s in light. Now, you must see that the dynamic range in this picture is very good, and the reason is in the normal mode.

CDR works. The HDR on both these cameras does not work in the high mode, which is as fees before each mode on both our phones, which means that when you are taking the pictures in the 64 megapixels all the 48 megapixels mode, you will lose the dynamic range. So here you can see that the dynamic range is perfect. In the previous picture, you saw that nothing was visible between these gaps, but now you can see that both phones are doing a very good job of separating the darker and the brighter areas of the pictures. Yes, this picture does compromise on 30 days, and that is because this time the picture is not very big.

I am finding the sharpness better on the Samsung Alexia's and light once again, the colors of the Samsung Galaxy S and later on the darker side. Look at these yellow flowers. They are like darker on the Samsung Galaxy s and light now the whole purpose of showing you these pictures is, since these phones have the camera said, the company has highlighted more than any other feature, and you are probably going to focus a lot on these cameras. So you must know that how these cameras can improve your pictures or how good these cameras are in these particular modes. Here is yet another picture from the ultra-wide camera of both the phones first things: first, that a 71 has a warm tone, and s and light has a cool tone.

The dynamic range seems better on the Samsung Galaxy s in light. Now this is the normal feature from both the cameras and I think you can tell at the very first glance that the 71 is taking a better picture. The dynamic range is better and the overall feel of the picture is better now. This is the same picture in the 64 megapixels versus of 48 megapixels camera mode, and you can see that once again, the Samsung Galaxy, a 71, is ahead. Guys I am not sure what's going on here, but the 71 for some reason is just making it very tough for the Samsung Galaxy s in light to win.

This is yet another picture from the ultra-wide cameras and I. Think it's not very hard for anyone to tell that. The picture of the Samsung Galaxy, a 71, is way ahead. For instance, take a look at this building. You see.

The dynamic range is way better on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 I am very excited about this phone, because I wasn't expecting its camera to be this way now. This is the same picture in the normal mode and here, for some reason, the galaxy s in light seems to be doing better. Let's find it out, so the IC light has slightly better dynamic range here, and it's keeping the picture late now. Both phones have an 8 X digital zoom. There is no optical lens on these phones.

You have to rely on the digital zoom only, and this is how the digital zoom captures the pictures you can see that the picture of the Samsung Galaxy S unlike is way better in the zoomed in mode. This is a normal picture from both the phones and there is a huge difference here. They say light is I, think managing everything in a much better way. If you look at the surface of this table, it is more detailed and saturated on the Samsung Galaxy. A 71, however, the color is close to reality on the Samsung Galaxy s, 10 light.

If we take a look at the shadows, I think that 10 light is struggling with the shadows. Once again, the 71 is managing them better. Here is an indoor picture between woods or phones, and by just looking at this picture. In the very first glance, you can tell that the 71 has a cool tone this time, but the Samsung Galaxy Asian light is on the warmer side. If we zoom in and check out the details, now, it's really difficult to pick up the winner between these phones.

Here is yet another picture. To give you guys an idea about how these phones manage the colors indoor. Now in this picture, the curtains will off from the windows, and it was caught with the sunshine coming inside the room. Now here you can see that the details are just equally good on both the sides. They are not better on one phone and the color accuracy is almost similar on both the sides.

There is an indoor ultraviolet picture from both the phones we can just zoom in and see which phones are doing better with the details, and you can see that the galaxy Asian light is where head with the details' system. Now this is the same picture from the normal modes of both the phones. This is 16 megapixels versus 12 megapixels. The picture of the Samsung Galaxy Asian light is on the cool side and warmer on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 to must keep in mind that 16 megapixels picture is going to be bigger than that 12 megapixels picture, and for this reason you will find the details better on the Samsung Galaxy s 71, and now this is 64 megapixels versus a 48 megapixels indoor picture. In this picture, you can see that the vacuum wall is looking very good on both the phones, it's just more bright on the Samsung Galaxy 71, but it's not looking bad at all on the Samsung gear, at least in light.

If you look at the sofa, it has a bluish shade this time, but it's completely gray on the Samsung Galaxy s everyone now. This is a non-night mode, low-light picture on the Samsung Galaxy s. Everyone will suggest in light and I believe that I don't need to tell you what's going on here. The Samsung gear education light is too stupid. With the details.

There is a shade on the picture of the Samsung Galaxy 71, which is actually destroying the entire picture, and now this is the same picture with the night mode turned on now, when the night mode is turned on, the 71 has brightened the picture, but the Samsung Galaxy S in light has retained a blue shade, but it has just brightened the picture with that clue shade. It would have been a lot better if the Samsung, Galaxy, S and light could do slightly better with the lights here. I did not like that blue shade, with the night mode turned on now. Here is an outdoor low-light picture without the night mode, and it goes without saying that the sunlight is doing way better for this picture, and this time this is the same picture with the night mode turned on the picture on the Samsung Galaxy s in light is just too bright this time and the picture of the Samsung Galaxy s. Everyone is not that great, but I cannot really tell you about the details here.

I will, let you guys be the judge once again, this is a non-macro picture from the Samsung Galaxy a 71 and isolate, and when you switch to the macro mode, this is what happens now here. You can see there ? in light as a better picture than the Samsung Galaxy s MD one. There is something that both phones are doing wrong. This flower is actually orange in the real. The both phones have made it pink, which is not good at all.

This is a macro picture of the same flower in the bright sunshine. Now you can see that the color tone has completely changed. One thing that I would like you guys to note here is that both phones have done a great job with the depth. Sensing here is another macro picture for that matter. Now you can see that the dynamic range is spread on the Samsung Galaxy s in light, but the a71 struggles with the dynamic range you can see that the top of the table is visible on the s10 light, but it's very dark on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 take a look at some selfies now.

First, this is a group selfie on both the phones, it's short in the 3 to 4 H mode, which is basically the 32 megapixels mode. Now here, the very first thing that I have noted is that the galaxy, a 71, is not doing very good with the edge protection. You can see that the these here on my head, and they are completely vibed off in the picture of the Samsung Galaxy s Emily one also when we zoom in we find that the galaxy a 71 is doing slightly better with the details. I think they are the same on both the phones. This is the same 32 megapixel selfie, but this time it's in the normal mode and not in the group mode.

So now you can see that once again, the s in light is showing those here's tail light has compromised slightly on the edges this time, but the galaxy a 71, completely wipes them off. This is not a good thing. It should try to manage the edges a little. The overall tone of the picture seems similar on both the phones. The galaxy s in light is just beautifying.

My face too much now here is a group selfie with the live focus mode turn on the depth effect of both our phones is very good, but let's talk about the edge detection. Edge detection is horrible on both the sides. They have completely wipe off the hair, but I believe that is how the life focus works. Another thing that you must note here is that the details are vital on the Samsung Galaxy s and light now. This is the normal selfie in the life focus mode, and this selfie seems very good on both the phones, but I will pick up the Samsung Galaxy a 71 selfie here, and that is because of keeping the tone slightly natural.

It's not completely natural, but it's slightly close to the reality. On the other side, the beauty effect is just too much on the Samsung Galaxy S Pen light. It's a very good picture on both the phones- and you guys can tell me which phone's picture are you liking more now? These phones have the pixel winning cameras. These cameras are supposed to take very good low-light pictures, and this is a first low-light picture without the night moon now in this picture, the galaxy a 71 has a green tint, which is not a good thing. If you take a look at the Samsung Galaxy s in light, which will it's very good now, this is the same picture with the night mode turned on, and here's the Samsung Galaxy 71 has done an incredible job.

The picture is looking very good on both the phones, but I believe that the details are described better on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71. This is an indoor normal selfie on both the phones. This time the action light is just way ahead of Samsung Galaxy 71. The cameras of these phones were completely clean. Despite that, there is a shade on the picture of the Samsung Galaxy 71.

I am not sure. Why is that? But if you take a look at the Samsung, Galaxy S and lights pictured, it's just superb, with the details and the overall tone. Now this is the same picture with the life focus turned on and once again, that's in light is just way ahead. There is that shade on the Samsung Galaxy s, everyone which I am Not sure very sad coming form. You can just tell by looking at the overall picture that the Samsung Galaxy efficient light is way ahead.

Both phones can capture 4k videos at 30 frames per second in the 4k mode. There is no stabilization in the play on either of these SLI. It has a dual OS and the 71 has EAS, but none of this works in the 4k videos, which is why the handheld videos will come out shaky. The colors in this video seem a bit deep on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 site. These phones can do 4k, Ultra videos too, and the result is somewhat similar, though stabilization is in the play once again.

These phones also support 1080p videos at 30 frames per second, as I mentioned earlier. Rest in light has 1080p at 60 frames per second as well, but I am NOT going to show you that here, because this comparison is all about the common modes. Only if you want to check out the 60fps capabilities of this in light, take a look at my complete galaxy s, 10 light camera review. These phones can also do 1080p ultra-wide videos and in the 1080p mode, ? still light has its dual OS working. While there is every one as its T is working, let me know which phone's videos are you guys finding better? And lastly, these phones also support the super.

Steady videos. Remember that the super steady videos will come out awful. These videos will be stable, but with a great compromise on the resolution, take a look at the front camera videos now hey folks. This is a front fork, a video from the Samsung Galaxy s, 10 light and the Samsung Galaxy s 71 these phones to not offer any kind of stabilization for the front camera, and you can now check out the colors being captured by these phones and also check out the mic. Recording quality I am shooting outside and there is a little of drizzle right now.

Take a look around and now this is a front 10 80 B video at 30 frames per second for from both the phones. The extra light has this edge that it can capture 1080p at 60 frames per second as well, but obviously I am NOT going to show you that in this comparison- and this brings us to the conclusion- I will make it very simple and clear hats off to the Samsung Galaxy S 71. It was a battle. Well fought the I-71 compared to the Galaxy S and light. Does a great justice with its price tag that is 40% less than destined light, as the light is giving you 60 FPS with 1080p and snapdragon 855 CPU for that image processing, but for extra 40% you just don't get these two features on the Samsung Galaxy, a 71 but other than this.

The GW one center of the 71 has done a great job. A 71 doesn't have as leaf colors assassin light, but as I keep saying in my videos, color choice is subjective as a light. Sonia mx-5 86 has a color boost all over its pictures, but that's not what all users would like I believe when a phone like that galaxy have anyone can go this close with the galaxy ace and light. There is no point in spending your hard-earned extra bucks on the galaxy s turn light. Let me know about your thoughts on this video and let me know which camera appeal you more if you have not subscribed yet subscribe now with that said, I will sign off, see you in the next one.

Source : TechwithUsama