Samsung Galaxy A32 and A52 Comparison (Gaming, Performance, Cameras, Battery) By Valor Reviews

Hello guys valor reviews here now in this video I will be comparing the Samsung Galaxy a32 with the Samsung Galaxy a52, the Samsung Galaxy a52 is obviously the better smartphone year. But how does it compare with the cheaper Samsung Galaxy a32? Well, stick around to find out now for the build quality. Both smartphones have a plastic rear. Plastic frame. Plastic is boring, but it's durable. The rear of the Samsung Galaxy a32 has a gloss finish to it.

While the Samsung Galaxy a52 has a matte finish and both smartphones look good between the two smartphones, I prefer the design of the Samsung Galaxy a32. It reminds me of the iPhone 5c, but I'll, be the first to admit that the Samsung Galaxy a52 does look more premium because of the matte finish and the rare looks a lot like the flagship, Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra. Both smartphones have corning gorilla, glass, 5 protection at the front and both are durable. Smartphones, like we already know, but this one area where the Samsung Galaxy a52 shows that it's boss and that's when it's time to swim. The Samsung Galaxy a52 is an ip67 certified device and can be submerged in water of 1 meters for 30 minutes.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy a32 isn't water and dust resistant. I kept it in water, and this happened. Submerging it in water is like playing Russian roulette. It might or might not survive. As you can see, mind barely survived the water test.

So for the build quality, the s21 ultra wannabe, I mean the Samsung Galaxy. A52 wins how about the external features? Well, both smartphones come with a 3.5 mm audio jack, a primary microphone, an USB type-c port. The Samsung Galaxy a32 has a single speaker, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 has stereo speakers, and they sound great. Both smartphones have volume and power buttons on the right side. Both smartphones have a secondary microphone at the top.

The Samsung Galaxy a32 comes with a dual NATO sim card tray and a memory card slot, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with a hybrid NATO, sim card, slash memory card tray, both smartphones have the capacity to use a one terabyte SD card, and they both have an optical fingerprint scanner on their display in testing out the fingerprint scanner. I disabled, the fingerprint animation to make unlocking fast on both smartphones and the fingerprint scanner of the Samsung Galaxy a52 is quicker. It's about one second faster than the Samsung Galaxy a32. I would like to add that both fingerprint scanners did an amazing job and I got very few mismatches for the first unlock feature. I found the Samsung Galaxy a52 to be faster and more accurate, now moving to the display.

This is one area where it gets a little complicated. To pick a winner, the Samsung Galaxy a32 comes with a 6.4 inch panel with an infinity. U display, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with 6.5 inch panel with an infinity old display. Infinity? U and o are just how the front camera cutout looks like both displays are super AMOLED displays with a resolution of 1080 by 2400 pixels, the maximum brightness on both smartphones is 800 nits and, most importantly, both displays have a refresh rate of 90 heads, which is noticeable when you scroll, I mean you can't go wrong with the display of these smartphones. Watching content on both displays is very good.

The colors are breathtaking. Both displays are identical and to pick a winner I'll have to nitpick and yeah. It goes because the Samsung Galaxy a52 has a slightly taller display and the camera cutout looks more than it wins the display comparison. But, honestly, you can't go wrong with the display of these smartphones now for performance. The difference between the two smartphones is large.

The Samsung Galaxy a32 comes with a MediaTek hello g80 processor, which is a 12 nanometer processor, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with a snapdragon 720 g processor, which is an eight nanometer processor. Unfortunately, the Samsung Galaxy a32 starters a bit. It hangs here and there when you scroll it's hard to show on camera, but it's definitely there. Is it a dealbreaker? Well, no, should you worry about it? Not really, but it isn't as smooth as the Samsung Galaxy a52. That's for sure, moving to the benchmark results, the Samsung Galaxy a52 scores higher.

When I run the an tutu benchmark test, it also scored higher engagement, test, 3d mark and JFK bench. The Samsung Galaxy a52 has the superior processor, which translates to better photos and videos better performance. It also has the better GPU when it comes to gaming. Launching PUBG both smartphones run the game. Well, both smartphones play the game at HD, graphics and high frame rates when the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes on top is with the stereo speakers.

It makes gaming come alive. I can't say the same with the lackluster mono speaker on the Samsung Galaxy a32 and that speaker is easy to block moving on to Gandhi impact. The Samsung Galaxy a52 opened the game faster. Both smartphones can play this game at the highest graphics settings and even at 60 frames per second, but I find the gameplay on the Samsung Galaxy a52 to be much smoother for real racing. Both smartphones handle the game well, and I have no complaints here.

Moving on to Call of Duty, both smartphones run the game. Well, the Samsung Galaxy a32 played the game on medium graphics and high frame rates, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 played the game at high graphics and very high frame rates with the Andrew 618 GPU on the Samsung Galaxy a52, you get better gaming experience, as you can see, for games like asphalt, 9 that are not too graphic intensive. Both smartphones can play it in the highest graphics settings with no issues now moving to the operating system. Both smartphones are running on android 11, with Samsung one UI 3.1 for multitasking. Both smartphones come with six gigabytes of ram so for the performance department, the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes on top because it has the superior processor.

Now, moving to the camera department, the Samsung Galaxy a32 comes with a 20 megapixel front-facing camera, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 has a 32, megapixel, front-facing camera, and this time around this smartphone with the higher megapixel wins images on the Samsung Galaxy a52 are noticeably sharper. Both shots look better on the Samsung Galaxy a52 as well. Hello, guys, here's a video from the front facing camera of both smartphones, the Samsung a52 can shoot in 4k right now, shooting at 4k, while the Samsung a32 can only shoot in 1080p, perfect frames per second. So what do you guys think about the 4k video from the Samsung a52? Is it better than a 1080p video from the Samsung a32? Let me know in the comment section below. Let me know which one you guys prefer now moving to the rare both smartphones come with a 64 megapixel camera 5, megapixel depth and 5 megapixel macro camera.

However, the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with 12 megapixel ultra-wide camera. Looking at the white shots, the Samsung Galaxy a52 takes better pictures now moving to the main 64 megapixel camera. Both smartphones take 16 megapixel shot and through pixel bin in they can produce 64 megapixel images. The picture captured by the Samsung Galaxy a52 are noticeably sharper night mode on the Samsung Galaxy. A52 is better as well now, switching to the rear camera, the Samsung a52 can shoot in 4k right now, shooting at 4k, while the Samsung 832 is shooting in 1080p 30 frames per.

Second, that's the maximum resolution on this camera. So what do you guys think about the 4k footage from the Samsung a52 and the 1080p footage on the Samsung 832, which one do you guys prefer another party trick? The Samsung a52 has is image stabilization and when it's on that mode, it can only shoot in 1080p 30 frames per second. So right now, I'm jogging this is Samsung a52, doing a better job in stabilizing the image for the video. Rather, what do you guys think? Let me know in the comment section below so guys for the camera department hands down the Samsung Galaxy a52 wins as it has more features. It takes better pictures and can shoot in 4k using the front and rear cameras.

Now for the battery department, the Samsung Galaxy a32 comes with a 5 000 Williams battery, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with 4 500 Williams battery, both smartphones come with 15 watts, fast charger. The Samsung Galaxy a52 is capable of charging at 25 watts, but the charger Samsung included in the box is a 15 watts fast charger using the 15 watts fast charger to charge both smartphones. It took the Samsung Galaxy a52 one hour, 36 minutes to charge from zero to one hundred percent, while it took the Samsung Galaxy a32 two hours and 17 minutes for the battery drain test. I kept the display of both smartphones at 50 brightness and I played to YouTube for two hours. I ran an tutu benchmark tests continuously for one hour I opened Instagram rails and at the six-hour mark, the Samsung Galaxy a52 battery dropped to 43 percent, while the Samsung Galaxy a32 battery went down to 50 percent now to really stress both smartphones.

Furthermore, I ran 3dmark for an hour. Furthermore, I played YouTube for two more hours and at the 9-hour mark the Samsung Galaxy a52 battery dropped to 17, while the Samsung Galaxy a32 battery dropped to 26 percent after 10 hours and 27 minutes the Samsung Galaxy a52 through in the tower, which is impressive at 11 hours, 23 minutes the Samsung Galaxy a32 battery got depleted, making it the winner of the battery drain test, the Samsung Galaxy a52 charges faster, but the Samsung Galaxy a32 lasts longer, which smartphone wins in the battery department. You know what I'll, let you guys decide in the comment section below so guys. The overall winner of this comparison test is obviously the Samsung Galaxy a52. I hope you found this video to be useful.

I have more comparison. Videos lined up so consider subscribing to this channel. So that's it from me. Thank you for watching, and I will see you guys soon. Halo signing out.

Source : Valor Reviews