Redmi K40 Pro vs Realme GT Detailed Camera Comparison By Han's Tech Talk

What's up everyone welcome to another camera comparison video. Today I have this Redmi k40 pro and Realme gt. A lot of subscribers have requested for this video and yeah now. Finally, this video is here: I've been waiting for an update on Redmi, k40, pro and yeah. This video was made after that update, so camera performance of Redmi k4d pro should be a bit better than before. If you have watched my other camera comparison, videos of Redmi k40 pro, then you already know that Redmi k40 pro camera performance is not that good okay check this video carefully, listen carefully! You are the judge.

You watch through this video check this video and let me know which one is better and yeah. If you end up liking this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and subscribe to this channel. The first thing: you'd notice in ultra white photos, is dynamic range and then, if you check for a while, you will see that there is a big difference in color temperature. Some people have asked me: what is the difference between white balance and color temperature? Actually, white balance corrects and neutralize color temperature white balance tries to make the photo natural by adjusting color temperature and k40 pro clearly has failed to do it correctly. Neither Realme gt has done it well, but a bit better than k40 pro now the next thing caught.

My attention is exposure and saturation. Yes, real met definitely got more details in the shadows, but due to its poor, texture, processing and exposure subject and foreground lost a lot of details. The same thing used to happen with k40 pro earlier, but a lot of the issues are now fixed. After this new update, both of these two smartphones produced ultrawide images, which are really lucrative and social media ready, but the truth is now k40 pro beside this Realme gt looks more realistic. It grabbed more details, processed more textures, kept exposure, pretty even whether it's an outdoor photo or an indoor photo.

Also color grading is slightly better. One thing surprised me is k40 pro now reproduced images with better color temperature, yeah still k40 pro, sometimes randomly increases its saturation, actually not much of a difference in performance. When we try to take indoor low light photos, the difference in color trading is more visible, with very good amount of details and process. Textures k40 pro produced very sharp and lucrative image. I must mention most of the time when I've tried to take indoor low light photos, I mean ultra white photos: real magi city failed to produce natural white balance, mix 686 on k40 pro vs IMAX 682 on realm gt, both got main sensors from Sony and both are last generation.

Sensors comparison between photos taken with the main sensors of these two smartphones should be interesting. All of these pictures were taken on auto mode with AI enabled and auto HDR. Of course, both of these two have pro modes. So if you have the time to dial in and switch between options to get a pro shot of your choice, then you can, but most of the general users uses auto mode, and I feel like this represents true pros and cons of the smartphones. We see a similar trend, I mean main sensor.

Photos are somehow similar to those ultrawide photos. The main difference is not only in white balance, highlights and ambience are also pretty different. All these things actually jumps back and forth, but Redmi k40 pro managed to get things in line and images are more natural and lucrative. Yes, color temperature is actually a bit warm on Realme gt, but not too much. Nothing unacceptable.

Once again, k40 pro rendered colors with perfection which doesn't make it as punchier and lucrative as Realme gt, but with good exposure and better dynamic range images produced by Redmi, k40 pro is close to reality. Now I must say there are three things which I care: most details, textures and shadows in low light environment, realm gt, failed to process photos with enough details and textures and yes, most of the time shadows got crushed. Even if at a glance it looks sharp, it doesn't grab enough information to do much editing. I know it depends on personal preference and I would like to know which one do you like and prefer neither Redmi k40 pro, not Realme gt. Have that precious telephoto lens this year.

Almost all the brands got rid of telephoto lens on budget smartphones, Redmi k30 pro zoom had a pretty nice telephoto lens for 3x optical zoom. It's a clear downgrade. If you are thinking about k4d pro plus note that one also doesn't have any telephoto lens. Definitely with a better sensor and better cropping algorithm helps Redmi k40 pro to get more details and textures up to 3x zoom. Both are somewhat usable, but after that photos get too blurry and soft as both use its main sensor, you can see white balance and color.

Grading is similar to those usual pixel beam photos. If you check other attributes, then no, you are not going to find a lot of differences. We need to do pretty heavy pixel, peeping and nitpicking to get any other differences yeah. None of these two smartphones got that gimmicky depth sensor, but there is a macro sensor which I think is really pretty useless. Both of these two smartphones maps, depth using ultrawide sensor and a lot depends on stock camera application or the algorithm that process things.

At the background, when I compare portrait photos, I care about both effect. Edge detection amount of textures processed in the subject and the separation line blend after checking a lot of portrait photos taken by these two smartphones. It is clear that there is a difference in white balance and tonal contrast, but I'm pretty surprised to see differences are pretty marginal in terms of edge detection. None has performed like a flagship yeah. These aren't no flagships, but comparatively Redmi k40 pro did well here.

Color curve and saturation is also similar, which once again surprised me, and then I got to get the real differences in white balance. Textures and shadows separation line blend performance is also pretty similar in indoor low light, but once again better on Redmi k40 pro clearly Redmi k40 pro has more details, processed more textures and portraits reality. Both effect of Redmi k40 pro used to be f 1.6, but after update it's around f 2.0 and that makes both effect creamy and lucrative. I found a few issues on both of the smartphones Redmi k40 pro takes a while to actually grab a portrait photo. It's like there is a second or a split second gap between the moment when you click the shutter and when the actual photo is grabbed.

So the subject has to be steady to get a perfect shot. On the other hand, Realme gt applies heavy saturation and unnecessarily decreases mid-tones. If you ask me, then, yes, I would select k4d pro for portrait, but the truth is. None of these two makes me happy what about night mode main sensor photos? Is there any improvement in k40 pro yeah? Here, it's a bit tricky, and it depends on personal preference. Do you want visibility? Do you want a photo that depicts reality? Do you want a picture with balance between brightness and details? This depends on what do you like? I prefer a good balance between noise, sharpness highlights and textures.

Truly, none of these two smartphones did as good as any other flagships, but k40 pro seems a bit better. It has better color rendition and in terms of grabbing the reality, it did better. K4D pro also processed more textures yeah. These are night mode photos, and before you do any judgement, a lot of things aren't fixed. I sometimes mean k4d pro and sometimes Realme gt saturated the photos, increase, highlights and got better shadow details.

It's more like a puzzle. I have tried from a few different angles and lighting options and the results are the same. I would go with k40 pro cause in terms of color grading, white balance, details and textures. K40 pro did slightly better real met pictures are brighter, but it has very high highlights and ambience. I feel this ruins the vibe of a night picture moving on to selfie camera and there is a drastic difference in performance.

Everything is better on Realme gt, selfie photos I mean from any aspect. K40 pro selfies are almost incomparable with this Realme gt. Real me gt front sensor, works fine and produced photos with more details and textures, while Redmi k40 pro applied heavy skin smoothing beauty effect. Even if I have tried to disable the beauty effect, there was some beauty effect. Color rendition and skin tone is also better on real me.

Gt Samara has tried a lot. She took about 30 pictures and these pictures are actually the best of Redmi k40 pro okay, I'm not going to describe these selfie portraits cause. There is an international smartphone giveaway going on for subscribers. I would choose someone based on a valid and descriptive comment. Why don't you try to differentiate between these selfie portraits and make a comment? Okay, these clips are recorded at 1080p, 30 frames per second, and then I have switched to 4k 30 frames per second.

To give you an instant idea of the difference, I really did not see much of a difference yeah. These are 4k 30 frames per second clips and I think real met produced this video clip with better white balance and saturation in terms of details, sharpness and color rendition. I would go with k40. Pro exposure is as bad than it can be on both of these two smartphones. I am sad to see.

Redmi k40 pro suddenly increased ambience beyond what is necessary. What do you think? Do you agree? If you don't know yet, then none of these phones got no wires and considering that both got as k40 pro did very good. Beside Realme gt, I mean look at the video clip on the left. It's almost as smooth as optical stabilization. On the other hand, Realme gt has lot more jitteriness.

Okay, it's time to wrap up, and the truth is k40 pro did good, but not as good as what we would like. Please comment, and let me know what do you think if you have liked this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and subscribe to this channel. You take for granted.

Source : Han's Tech Talk