Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia 3.4 - CAMERA TEST [Video, Images, Ultrawide,Selfie ] Comparison By Ultra Value Tech

Hey there in this video, we are going to compare the image quality of the Loki 5.4 against the Nokia 3.4. We are going to see if the Loki 5.4 with a much larger 48 megapixel rear camera, can actually take better photos than the Nokia 3.4 with the 13 megapixel camera. We are also going to see the full video test on the main camera, and also we're going to test the ultraviolet camera of the 5.4 and also 3.4, and even test the selfie camera of the 5.4 and see if it's better than the 3.4, all right. Let's begin by testing the stills image quality of both of these phones and see if the Nokia 5x4 can actually beat the Nokia 3.4 and if it's forced to spend extra to get the Nokia 5.4 instead of the 3.4 on the right side, we have image taken with Nokia 5.4, while on the left side, we have image taken with the Nokia 3.4. As you can see, it's Nokia 5.4. Therefore, the captures more details in the image.

Also, if you check out the dynamic range here, you can see everything is in clear focus here and very well exposed if you go over to the image of the 3.4 here. As you see, the background gets blown out and the details are in the focus. You can't really see these branches well as in this image, so the 5.4 definitely takes a better image. Okay, let's clear this next one, and I actually prefer the image of the Nokia 3.4. It just looks way better here, more well more exposed here.

This image there's actually barely any difference. However, if we look closely, the leaves on the 5.4 are exposed way, better, focused, also better and there's just way more details in these fine strands here. So three point four see details get lost, so actually it's image. Five for 5.4 is better okay and this picture of my dog. As you can see, the cautious ROG gets really well shown here, and you can see clear details here, while on this 3.4, the details get a bit lost here, so there's huge difference. The 5.4 definitely takes way by three images here: okay, in this image, it's a 5.4 actually captures very accurate colors, and this is what they should look like on the 3.4. The colors are way off and say, yeah look enjoy.

They are just like off. Also, if you check out this edge here on the pot, it gets a bit weird while it's 5.4, it's very natural. Okay, as you see the 5.4. Definitely I can get the object in focus much better, and it adds so much better image on the 3.4. It gets really mushy here.

Okay, in this picture of the pegs, I actually prefer the image taken with this 3.4. Then the sky on the picture with 5.4, gets blown out here. The clarinet winner is a 5.4 as it captures realistic and colors, while the 3.4, because just go way off even for leaves because her way off here and yeah. So three point four. Definitely can't capture reds as good as a 5.4. In this image.

We can see that the bell is not in very good detail here. There believed any details here, while on the 5.4. It's very sharp here, and you can see loads of details here, so it's a 5x4 definitely can take way better image here. Okay, here is a 5.4. It probably takes a more accurate image.

This is probably what it looks like in real life. However, I prefer this picture taken with a 3.4, as it looks more vibrant here, but again it's a bit more accurate on the 5.4 in this image. The cameras chose to do two different things here. We can see that it placed this one in bulky well on this image yeah, it's kind of try to place this in bulk, but yeah. They don't really look that good overall yeah, it's probably personal preference, whichever image you prefer for image techniques 5.4 definitely is better image in this image. Again, as you can see, there are lots of defined details here with the 5.4, while on the 3.4 they get more and the image that look a bit fuzzy here, while on this one, it's very sharp in this image. Probably these are more accurate colors on the 5.4. However, I probably prefer the 3.4 image here, even if they are not as accurate in this image. We can clearly see that the monkey 5.4 is a clear winner here. The details are very well exposed here and colors are very nice.

I was on the 3.4. The colors can get yeah all over go awful here. This image you can see. There's three trees are very well exposed and very nice detail. I launched 3.4 as I look a bit fuzzy here and if you check out the sky, skyline 5.4 is way better yeah and on 3.4 it kind of gets the same. Also, the snow on the 3.4 yeah, it's kind of mushy here, while on the 5.4 it's very well exposed and in fine details, looks perfect same with road here, and also you can see even a bit with the sign itself. Just looks in more good detail here, like here, I'm not sure which one looks better.

I probably say that 3.4 looks better. Where, again, you can maybe see some more finite details here, but yeah. I actually prefer the image taking this 3.4 in this image. Here you can see that the 5x4 definitely takes way sharper image and there's just more details here everywhere, the 3.4 again. This is not that many details and again exposure yeah on the 5.4. Definitely better.

Okay, in this image, if you are looking on the very small screen, you are probably thinking that this image looks better. However, when viewing on large screen again just a bit more details here, and it's more accurate image here, it doesn't definitely look like this in real life, it looks like this real iPhone 5.4. So 5.4 is winner. If you are viewing on small screen, maybe this image looks better again, as you see the snow on this 3.4. Well, you can't really tell that it's snow, it's very mushy here, while on the 5.4, it gets perfect textures here, and you can see in very good detail everything here so yeah, it's a 5.4 exposed so much better than the 3x4 here and 5.4 will bring it here. As you see, the sky on the 5.4 looks more realistic and better also check out these branches outlined with them. They just are more sharp and yeah way, better again check out the tree.

It's very good here, while on the 3.4, it's mushy with this guy, and doesn't look that good. Also, exposure here doesn't really catch that well in focus well on the 5x4. It catches fairly decently. This is a low light situation and yeah in low light. It's a 3.4 really struggles. It's not that 5.4 doesn't struggle. Furthermore, it basically performs slightly better than 3.4. Other phones, such as newest, pixels or iPhones do very, very better jobs as this okay and this image, as you see, the 5.4 again takes way more detailed image, and it looks more accurate and better than on the 3.4 on the 3.4, the bricks get kinda yeah. You can't really tell so.

There are bricks here. Following this, you can tell that video outlines of every brick here. Yeah, the sky, is more detailed on five point, four seven three point four and last picture is a bench, and I actually prefer it's a mistake, and this is 3.4, as the grass looks better and bench looks better in real life. It probably looks more like this or again. I prefer this image 3.4. It does better jumps here right.

Let's move to the video that's now, and this video from the Nokia 5.4 and let's join the sun, see how it goes and this video from the Nokia 3.4, let's shine the sun and see how it requires and this video quality from most of the phones boom. Let's hop up the video definitely looks very different from most of the phones and this video quality from most of the phones boom. Let's hold up the video definitely looks very different from all the phones, and this is the ultraviolet test on both of the cameras. Let me know which one looks better. So, let's try running test and see stabilization.

The old quad cameras right at first sight looked fairly decent, but we know which one looks better go check out this stuff, and this is the ultraviolet dust on both cameras. I hope this one's better. So, let's try running tests and see stabilization with the ultra part. Cameras right at first sight looked fairly decent. Let me know which one looked better, and this is video test from the main camera sure a bit of snow see how well it exposes and catches its fine details.

Let me know which one looks better, and this is video test from the main camera so see how well it exposes and catches its fine details. Let me know which one looks better, and this is a selfie camera test on the Nokia 5.4. Let's see how well it exposes it's quite cold outside, so were very close, great see, details in space and also, let's see the audio quality of this phone I definitely would prefer is a field of view would be much wider as you have to raise the phone. Quite apart from you, okay on the screen, it's called. It looks very good, but you'll see that later bigger screen all right.

So this is what you'd expect from the Nokia 5x4, and this is selfie camera test stocks and Nokia.3.4. Let's see how it looks, I can see that it struggles exposing sky. There are quite a lot of details in sky cover, 3.4, really struggles to expose the sky. Sometimes it catches like this or yeah. The sky has lots of details in reality.

However, on the screen I can see it's completely white blown out. It's a field of view on the Nokia 3.4. It definitely looks happy to either, and it's better towards the sky. Really it's completely blown out and yeah. You can see this face quality and details yeah.

So this is what the front facing selfie camera looks on. The Nokia 3.4 so is at the same time, go around. Lets I'm scared to go there up, as you saw the Nokia's 48 megapixel camera on the Nokia 5.4 was definitely better since Nokia's 13 megapixel camera on the 3.4 for the stills image quality for video. I can't really tell that the Nokia 5.4 is better than the Nokia 3.4 as often actually, the video quality on the 3.4 was actually better than the on the 5.4. It's a bit weird but yeah check out the video and let me know which video gold did.

You actually prefer the front-facing camera on the Nokia 5.4 definitely was better than on the Nokia 3.4. However, the main video cameras yeah, I'm not exactly sure if the 5.4 is any better than the 3.4, both of the cameras for video recording are pretty average, especially if you go in dark places where they're not much light or when there's bad weather. The video quality really falls apart on these phones so yeah, I can't really suggest any of these phones as a good video device. As for the image quality on both of these phones, if you had perfect weather outside and nice conditions, you could achieve a decent picture on either of these phones. However, the 5.4 definitely provided better image quality in most of the images it. It's probably thanks to the 48 megapixel sensor, the image on the 5.4 of them were sharper and there were much more details in the images than on the 3.4 again when it gets dark, and even if you are in indoors, and even you have decent lighting indoors, the image quality really falls apart on these phones. If you are only considering taking photos outdoors in good wester, then yeah, you will get okay results from these phones.

However, they don't really come close to anything like such as pixel phones or iPhones. Even if this phone has got a 48 megapixel camera, a pixel phone with only 12 meg pixels will completely beat this camera. It's that much of difference between these phones in good light. The 5.4 will provide okay pictures, however, when it gets not so good, the 5.4 really struggles and same for 3.4 in google lighting, as you saw, you can get okay pictures if you are looking for great build quality phone, which is very fast and has got very good specs and actually has okay camera. If you are only viewing the pictures on this main screen and if you are taking in some good light, then yeah.

This phone really is awesome phone and I don't really think you can get better phone than this for this price point, especially with clean operating systems such as android one on this Nokia 5.4. Alright, if you found this video helpful, make sure to hit the like button and if you want to see more videos about the either Nokia, 5.4 or Nokia, 3.4 so make sure to subscribe as I'll be releasing them very soon see you.

Source : Ultra Value Tech