Xiaomi Mi A3 VS Samsung A30s - Comparison, Camera Test, Speed Test, battery drain test By Valor Reviews

By Valor Reviews
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
Xiaomi Mi A3 VS Samsung A30s - Comparison, Camera Test, Speed Test, battery drain test

You guys Gala reviews here now the Samsung 830's is the best budget metering device being offered by Samsung for under $250. On the other hand, the Xiaomi me a3 is the king of budget phones for under $200. It has good specs, and it runs on pure vanilla Android in this video I'll be putting both of them head-to-head to see which device takes the crown in the blue corner. We have this Samsung 880's price that is 1,500 narrow for $223 and in the red corner. We have the Xiaomi me a three Tristan 71,000 error or 194 dollars. The price mention for both devices is for the foggy Graham, a 64 gigabyte, ROM variant.

Now, let's talk about the build quality and design the way of the Samsung 830's is made from plastic. The plastic is durable boy scratches easily Dashiki me a tree, on the other hand, has Connor and Gorilla Glass 5 at the front and rare it doesn't scratch easily. But if you happen to drop this phone on a hard surface, it might crack. The charm immediately feels a lot premium down the Samsung it that he has its heavier, and it's not a fingerprint magnet like the Samsung, a 30s. The Sham immediately wins in the build quality and design department.

The media tree has a dual SIM tray, while the Samsung 830's has a dual sim and memory card tray for the a tree, you can either put two SIM cards or one SIM card and a memory card. They both have the 3.5 mm audio jack, USB, C, charging, port and mono speaker where the sham immediately outperforms is Samsung 830's is it has an infrared blaster to control your AC Stevie, etc. It also has an LED light for notifications, while the Samsung 830's doesn't have well doesn't have any of that for the screen. The Samsung 830's has a six point. Four inch 720p AMOLED panel, while the shall we meet III, has a six inch 720p AMOLED panel.

What this place looked very good, colors of vivid, and I can't seem to pick a winner year. This Samsung Eats screen has a bit more contrast to it just a little and because it has it bigger, screen sides I'll give you to do something: a TTS nice, one Samsung. Switching to the mono speaker, Dashiki me III might look like it has two speakers by just one putting them side to side on Tony on the volume to max the chamois is way louder and Clara than the Samsung 80s for performance. This Samsung a TTS as an eponym 7904 chips. It's a 40 nanometer chipset, while the Xiaomi me a 3 has a snapdragon 665 chip benchmark score shows that the Xiaomi me a tree scores higher than the Samsung 880's for if you're a gamer.

This show immediately is the way to go because it has a faster processor. Let's do a split test and see just stop faster Xiaomi every ease with the Snapdragon 65 chip compared to the Samsung Eats, with the external 7904 chips. As you can see, the chamois a3 is the faster phone. Both phones are doing a pretty good job in unlocking the phone or the in display fingerprint scanner. Nevada me, a 3 is just faster now moving to the battery life, you get the photos on Williams battery on a Samsung 880's.

While on the Xiaomi me a tree, you get 4013 minions. Battery I did a battery drain test and the results are not what I expected from 100% battery life. After 2 hours watching YouTube with Samsung ATV S battery dropped to its 1%. While the Shame me 8/3 battery dropped to 80% two hours of one to two stress test: the Samsung ATV S battery dropped to 51 percent, while the Xiaomi me a tree dropped to 40 90 cents, one hour of playing Pop GED Samsung, a TTS battery dropped to 18 percent. While the Xiaomi me a tree battery dropped to 16% 30 more minutes of watching YouTube, the Samsung 88 years virtually dropped to 10 percent.

While the Xiaomi me a tree battery dropped to 11 percent I did a video recording of 1080p 30 frames per second and wanted to see which phone will die first, 23 minutes later, which I am immediately battery was flat, and it took 28 minutes for the Samsung 880's battery to die. So for the battery test, the Xiaomi me entry lasted for 6 hours, 53 minutes, while the Samsung Eats lasted for 6 hours.58 minutes I was expecting the shower immediately battery to outshine the Samsung 88 years battery because it has 30 millions watching more than Samsung 80s and a smaller display, I guess the lower processor speed on this something a TTS helped it here now for the cameras, the Samsung late 80s has a 16 megapixel front-facing camera, while the Xiaomi me 8 3 has a 32 megapixel front-facing camera cameras, don't have front-facing flash now higher megapixel numbers, don't really mean much these days. So here are some of the images captured using both cameras, which one do you think is better. Let me know in the comments below they both shoot in 1080p 30 frames per second for the bread camera did Samsung eat.30S has its turns 5, megapixel main camera, its megapixel, auto white camera and the 5 megapixel depth sensor. The a tree has a 48 megapixel main camera, 8 megapixel ultra-white camera and a 2 megapixel depth and so yeah.

Some images captured using the cameras for the camera. Both cameras did a good job, but to me, I personally feel like the whammy entry wins it. For me, the chamois III is still the undefeated king of Bhopal phones under 250 dollars. It has a faster processor between the two forms. It has the better build quality.

Furthermore, it is louder, it has more features inbuilt like the LED lights, the IR blaster, the camera can record in 4k, and it has image stabilization. The Samsung can record in 4k, and it doesn't have image stabilization, and it's cheaper so guys. The Xiaomi me III is still the undefeated king of project phones for under $200. Thank you for watching hope. You enjoyed this video.

Please like share. Leave a comment and subscribe to my channel and I will see you guys soon signing out.


Source : Valor Reviews

Phones In This Article



Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu