Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Xiaomi Mi 10i Camera Comparison By Han's Tech Talk

What's up everyone welcome to another camera comparison. Today we are going to be doing a camera comparison between Xiaomi, mi, 11 and Xiaomi mi 10. I I I wanted to do this at night, because mostly all the smartphones takes very good pictures in daytime, and today I have shower with me. Okay, please check which one sounds better, which one looks better where she already looks better. Where I look better yeah, I don't look better. She looks prettier.

If you end up liking this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and subscribe to this channel. Let's flip to rear cameras. All of these images were taken in auto mode because I think most of the people uses their smartphone camera in auto mode. I am happy to see that Xiaomi mi 1095g has really put up a fight, considering it's a mid-range smartphone. It really has performed.

Well. Yes, me 11 offers images that is sharper full of detail and dynamic range. But after snapping and taking almost about 50 pictures side by side, I found some key differences. You should understand that white balance and color tone can be fixed or edited, if necessary at a later point. But you cannot add more details.

You cannot add structural sharpness, while editing and the first thing you'll notice is white balance. Xiaomi meet and continued to produce images with a bit of warm tone and Xiaomi 11 kept its cool tone other than that due to its aperture and shutter speed. Midnight fails to correctly focus, and if there is any movement while snapping a photo, it would become a little blurry. I really don't know why Xiaomi continued to use AMX 108 megapixel sensor as a main sensor of me 11 and besides Samsung hm 208, megapixel sensor on Xiaomi mi 109. It's really inferior to any flagship smartphones in terms of color rendition details, details in the shadows, texture, processing, HDR, noise level and white balance.

Xiaomi's mi 11 proved far better than meet and eye. Wait, I'm not saying that Xiaomi mi 11 produced top class images, but it's simply better than meet and eye time for ultrawide pictures in an indoor environment under artificial light, and it's no surprise that me 11 with 13 megapixel sensor and better ISP does better yeah at a glance it may not look. There is a huge or drastic difference, but there are differences and mutant. I actually cannot perform like a flagship as it comes with a smaller 8 megapixel sensor and weaker ISP Xiaomi mi 109 continued to slightly overexpose, even in ultra-wide shots. This little extra exposure along with increased, highlights, really hurts the whole picture and even at a glance, pictures are pretty mediocre.

Xiaomi 11, processed images with a bit of saturation but color curve and contrast ratio is better and that makes photos look better in certain conditions, with more pleasing white balance and wider dynamic range. And yes, if you check carefully, then you can clearly see that me.11 color rendition is close to reality. Me 11 continued to process more details in the shadows. I think overall low light. Ultrawide shots are clearly better on me.11. in most of my camera comparison, I do not compare ultrawide video capabilities of smartphones, but many of my subscribers requested for it, and here it is first, let me mention that Xiaomi mi 109 has no stabilization in ultrawide.

Video recording me 11 wide video performance is not as good as its ultrawide photos, while recording videos it fails to process. Well-Lit areas fails to maintain correct exposure. However, me 11 grabbed more details and processed more textures. I also must mention. Color rendition is really far better on me.11. , let's switch to portrait mode, both Xiaomi mi, 109 and Xiaomi 11 have to use their main sensor to grab the portrait shots.

And, yes, there is a 2 megapixel depth sensor on Xiaomi mi 109, which I really think is an unnecessary thing and a marketing gimmick because look at this Xiaomi mi 11 this one uses its ultraviolet sensor to calculate depth and even being an expensive device. It doesn't have a depth sensor once again, it is not surprising to see edge, detection and both effect is better on Xiaomi 11. , but I am surprised to see that overall portrait photos are pretty similar. Yes, if you have been watching this video from the beginning, then you already know that white balance on Xiaomi mi tonight randomly jumps back and forth, based on lighting condition and surrounding colors in an indoor, artificial lighting condition. Xiaomi MIT and I produced portrait photos with better white balance, slightly warm color temperature and slight saturation.

It is true that none of these two managed to reproduce true to life skin tone, because Xiaomi mi 11 produced photos. That is a bit pale which is truly unlike any Xiaomi smartphones change of time and place and results are not the same. I should say there is a drastic difference in data in portrait photos both have a few similar issues like aggressive separation of subject and background blurriness or both effect seems slightly more than usual or necessary, random artifacts and sharp cutouts around the edges, higher shadows with lower mid-tones. If a face was detected, then some kind of skin smoothing beauty effect is applied. It is very difficult to say for sure which one of these have better edge detection caused.

None of these performed consistently and managed to detect edges perfectly all the time Xiaomi meet, and I chose to go for a bit over exposure and brightness, while Xiaomi mi 11 kept skin tone almost true to life. Skin, smoothing beauty effect of Xiaomi on both of these two smartphones makes things a bit soft, but look at the hair color, and I can see true to life color tone and more textures on the images produced by Xiaomi.11. , wait, don't just get very happy. Xiaomi, mi, 11 portrait mode performance is not like a true flagship, smartphone yeah. These are main sensor photos.

The main difference is in details, white balance and shutter speed. Yes, me 11, of course, has better aperture and gets more into its sensor and managed to process more textures. On the other hand, mutant eye white balance is a bit unusual. It doesn't look attractive. Colors are a bit saturated.

I mean check clothing of Samara. Xiaomi's mi 11 has better color rendition along with more details and looks as it is in real life. Skin tone took a nosedive on both of the smartphones and most of the people, wouldn't like this skin tone and the background too, because it looks a bit pale now. The most important part for me is details and shadows, because, while editing, you cannot add details in terms of details me 11 is well ahead. These two are incomparable because a few days ago, while I have compared me, 11 with iPhone 12, me 11, even processed more textures, with sharpness and side by side, iPhone 12 photo rather looked a bit soft.

Once again, a lot depends on personal preference and considering price tag mitten. I actually did well enough. Yes, we have checked indoor low light, ultrawide photos and meteorite performed well, but under true sunlight, meteorite ultrawide photos just falls way behind me 11. This is mainly due to three factors: smaller sensor, poor aperture and weaker processor. In some images, it's pretty clear that meta knight stock camera is not that optimized, and it may get a bit better with updates when there is a direct sunlight blazing at the lens contrast.

Ratio along with exposure goes wild and white balance takes a nosedive which is not only surprising but also frustrating. I don't think that we have to talk about the details and textures, because it's truly visible that me 11 have more details and processed more textures, despite having a bigger selfie sensor with better lens and aperture Xiaomi mi 11, selfie and selfie portraits are similar to Xiaomi mi 10 i5 g Xiaomi mi 109 has a bit of a warm tone, more beautification, fewer details and textures. While me 11, again processed with better color tone and correct exposure overall self images of me, 11 is a bit better and yes, dynamic range is also better on Xiaomi 11. These video clips were recorded at 4k, 30 frames per second, and please check carefully, which one is better. But before that, it's worth mentioning me, 11 costs more than twice of mute, and I 5g mi 10i 5g depends on as.

While me 11 main sensors is sitting on is yeah. There is a bit of a difference in stabilization. There is a bit more jelly effect on the video recorded with Xiaomi mi 109. However, noise removal algorithm worked similar on both, I think, considering price and specification mitten. I did way better and me 11 didn't do good enough.

Now. It's 1080p 30 frames per second and me: 11 just got a bit more ahead with better performance. Actually this was expected me 11 should perform better. I am also a bit confused. Meteorite white balance is pretty good while snapping pictures, but it unusually becomes warm while recording videos other than that details in the shadows and texture processing is really far behind than me: 11.

Color rendition and exposure yeah, of course, better on me, 11. While there are more noise and grains in Xiaomi meeting eye video clips. Okay, it's time to wrap up, but before that I mean we shouldn't have compared Xiaomi mi 109 5g with Xiaomi mi 11. I know, but I wanted to check how good is this Xiaomi mi 10 I, and I am truly surprised- Xiaomi mi, 10 i5g did very good Xiaomi mi 11, of course, is better than Xiaomi mi 109, but Xiaomi mi 11 doesn't perform like a true flagship. I want to know what you think.

Please don't forget to make a comment and if you have liked this video, then please click on the like button and subscribe to this channel time.

Source : Han's Tech Talk