Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Realme X50 Pro / Galaxy Note 10 Lite / OnePlus 7T / iQOO 3 - Battery Drain Test! By C4ETech

By C4ETech
Aug 15, 2021
0 Comments
Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Realme X50 Pro / Galaxy Note 10 Lite / OnePlus 7T / iQOO 3 - Battery Drain Test!

In, our last video we charged up quite a few popular phones around the 40,000 rupee mark and given their all at a hundred percent. Now, let's see which one lasts the longest in this battle drain test: hey guys, ash shirr' from c4 e deck and if you don't end up finding this video interesting, please subscribe and on all notifications by hitting that Bell icon. Let's now get this video started. So, let's start with a quick refresher of our contenders from left to right. We've got the Xiaomi me 10, the Samsung Galaxy Note, in light the OnePlus 70, the cool 3 and finally, the Realme X 50 Pro, to the far right. Of course, we've got a trusty Poco f1 keeping track of time.

So that's it for the introductions, and before we dive straight in whom do you think going to win this one leave a comment down below and let's see, if we can, if your predictions turn out right now, all phones they've been charged to 100% plugging the charging cables off. We have set them to the same brightness levels across the board and all phones are at their highest clean, refresh rate. Let's start things off with some c4 attack: videos on YouTube checking back in after half an hour, the median has just lost 1%, the Realme x50 Pro and the Galaxy Note 10.1 teach were the one place 70 and the code 3. They are tied both losing 2% each kicking things into a higher gear. Let's run pub G now we're back after an hour.

The 10, it's an 87%, the note and light. It's surprisingly dropped, 20% of its battery ? 1 / 70, it's at 84%, the IQ 388 and the real makes 50 Pro 86, all within 2% of each other. What surprised me here is that the no 10 light and lost a chunk of its battery %, despite having a pretty sizable 4,500 mAh battery here. That also happens to be the second largest in a test. Today, I'm going on over to some light social media usage, we opened up the explore page on Instagram, cruel it a bit so that every phone has a mix of photos and videos running on it.

Let's let it run for an hour okay, so we are 2 hours and 30 minutes into our test and here's how the numbers look the meet ends at 82%, the note in lights, 72, 1, plus 70 77 Michael 3, has taken a surprising lead with 83% battery remaining well, the x50 Pro, it's in the middle of the pack with 78% juice left time, not to stress the chips further, which GFX bench we're at the benchmark.5 times it's been 4 hours into the test and the Samsung as well as 1, plus they've dipped below the 50% mark. The x50 Pro is just at the halfway mark. Well, the IQ 3 and the meeting they are a tabletop was with 61 and 62 percent battery left respectively, looks like the lower refresh rate on the icon.3 is helping it keep pace with the median, and it's larger battery switching to asphalt, 9. Next, we ran the game for an hour straight and now the phones are looking a little worse for wear except the ICU. All other phones are below the 50% mark.

The meeting is at 49 just lower. The Realme is at 37 note in light. + 1 + 70 are at the bottom, with 33 and 29 percent respectively, looks like the smaller 3,800 mAh battery, combined with that 90 health refresh rate. It's taken a toll on the 1 + 70. It's pushed it to the bottom.

Let's now try recording some 4k video. After about 15 minutes of video recording, let's see how the phones are holding up. The meeting is at 45%. The no turn light has just a quarter of its battery left. The 70 is even lower at 23%.

The AGO 3 is not leading the pack at 46% and the x50 pro it stays put and third place with 30% juice left. Next up, we've got another benchmark this time it's Geek bench 5 like before. We are running at 5 times in a row. We are now five hours 51 minutes into the test and both the Northern Light, and the 1 + 7 P there are struggling. The median is at 37%, the ICU 39 X 50 Pro at 23, looks like the larger screen size combined with the older and less efficient.

Then I'm Amiga based Enos 98. Then it's kind of let the new ten light down firing up G. Once more looks like the Newton light it couldn't last the hour. It dies after 6 hours and 46 minutes. The one-play 70 is on its last legs as well, and it dies just three minutes later, so we now have the meet and at 25 percent the IQ 3 at 27 and finally, the X 50 Pro hanging on with just 9 percent juice left.

So let's start the test here, since the results are pretty clear at this point the median and the IQ 3. They are the winners. By extrapolating the data, we can see that a combination of the 90 Hertz and 47 80 mAh battery. Despite that, the meeting should last a total of 9 hours and 5 minutes on a test. The ICO 3, despite the smaller 4400 mAh battery, would still take the crown with a total time of 9 hours and 20 minutes.

As for the X 50 pro 5 G, it should come in at 7 and a half hours, so the surprising thing here was the IQ winning and despite having a lower capacity battery, guess that's due to the refresh rate and the smallest 6.44 rain screen here. So that's my night for the strain test which one of these phones surprise to you, the most personally I thought the meeting would come out on top despite the 90 Hertz panel, and also the no 10 right, I didn't expect it to die. So quick, so leave a quick comment down below letting me know what you felt. Also do you guys want me to do more drain tests? Did you find this video interesting if you want to see more, which one should I include in the next one next rain test? Let me know again in the comments below and with that we get to the end of this video thumbs up thumbs down based on whatever you think about it. Subscribe turn on notifications by hitting that Bell icon, if you haven't yet thanks a lot for watching til next time, my name's ash you've been watching c4 attack, and I'm signing off.

For now, you guys have a great day bye, bye.


Source : C4ETech

Phones In This Article





Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu