Sony Xperia 1 III vs Samsung S21 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max Charging Speed Test! By TechNick

By TechNick
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
Sony Xperia 1 III vs Samsung S21 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max Charging Speed Test!

The Sony, Xperia 1 mark iii may very well be the world's first smartphone to house a 4k 120hz display, but that display drained down its battery a lot faster than the best devices from Samsung and apple. In my recent battery drain test, that being said, 6 hours and 21 minutes is still pretty decent battery life, provided it charges faster than the Xperia 1 mark 2 did, which took a whopping 1 hour and 54 minutes to charge from 0 to 100. Well, in theory, it should charge faster than its predecessor thanks to an increased charging limit of 30 watts, as opposed to 18 watts last year, but the battery has been bumped up from 4000 to 4500 William hours. The Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra has a slightly smaller wattage capability of the Sony at just 25 watts, but a bigger battery of 5000 Williams, while the iPhone 12 Pro max has the smallest battery of the lot at 3687 William hours and the smallest wattage block of just 20 watts. Can the Sony, Xperia 1 mark 3, claim a victory today over the s21 ultra and iPhone 12 Pro max with its increased charging wattage? This is tech neck and without further ado, let's find out before we get started, it's worth checking the temperature of all devices sitting at room temperature without currently being plugged in charge. This will change as each interval passes, plugging them all into charge, tapping the start button on the timer phone, all the way on the right hand, side and checking the time interval at the top right-hand corner which has now changed to five minutes.

Since we've hit that interval time, we have six percent on the opera, eight percent on the s21 ultra and seven percent on the iPhone. The time interval is in relation to the percentage above each phone and below the branding of each device, and I have made sure to disable all forms of battery optimizations or battery care. That is only ready on the Sony and on the iPhone, while the Samsung I have made sure to enable fast charging. After 10 minutes, we have 14 on the opera, which is trailing. The s21 ultra is 15 and matching the iPhone's 14.

So far, the coolest phone in terms of interval and peak has been the iPhone and the hottest has been the opera. After 15 minutes, we have 23 on the opera, which is once again matching the iPhone to 23, but the s21 ultra is still leading the pack here with 26, though not that much quicker than the other devices. It does have a much larger battery and not necessarily the fastest wattage block of the lodge. That is indeed the Xperia with 30 watts. The Samsung has 25 watts and the iPhone has just 20 watts, though the iPhone has the smallest battery.

After 25 minutes, we have 40 on the Xperia matching the iPhone once again at 40 44 on the s21 ultra is still leading the pack over here, which one can pass the 50 mark. First, it is indeed the s21 ultra after 30 minutes we have 51 on the Samsung 48 on the Sony, which is now one percent ahead of the iPhone 12 Pro max sitting at 47, with the iPhone still being the coolest in terms of interval and peak and the Sony still being the hottest in terms of interval and peak, and the peak is sitting at over 50 degrees on the Sony, which is not necessarily a good thing. After 45 minutes, we have 68 on the Sony, which is now two percent behind the iPhone very strange at 70 and 73 still leaning the pack no surprise. The s21 ultra nearing that one hour mark time interval hitting that one now, which one is going to be the most ahead. It is indeed the Samsung, no doubt there, but then the iPhone is still ahead of the Sony this time by three percent ahead 81, as opposed to the 78 on the Sony.

But now the Sony was the coolest at the interval and the iPhone store has the coolest peak. But the Samsung got the hottest in that last interval of one hour. But, needless to say, the Samsung actually hits the 100 mock interval in first place over here. In just one hour and 14 minutes. It says one hour and 15 minutes over here, but at the bottom of the screen, a trickle to a hundred percent on one hour and 14, and it's still pretty impressive over there, though I have gotten it a bit quicker less than an hour and 10 minutes.

Nevertheless, an hour and 60 minutes has passed 87 on the Xperia 1 mark 3, as opposed to 91 on the iPhone 12 Pro max, which is now four percent ahead of the opera, which one is going to boost faster over here in the last remaining minutes, and are they both gonna force cool down their devices causing charging to slow down like iPhone? Always do we're? Going to expect that from the iPhone, I'm not quite sure, what's going to happen with the Sony, but I can assure you that battery can battery health on the Sony and iPhone respectively have been disabled. So they should be charging at the maximum wattage right now, but they are both getting a hell of a lot cooler.32.6 degrees in Celsius in the last interval on the Sony and 32 degrees in Celsius in the last interval on the iPhone, so they're, both cooling down a hell of a lot. The Sony has now pulled ahead here. Well, not ahead of the iPhone but narrowing the gap. Now 99 a piece over here still 99 after an hour and 48 minutes are in 49 minutes.

The Sony actually beat the iPhone, which is impressive, but not so much since the Sony has well, it does have a bigger battery, but it does have faster charging and iPhones are known for extremely slow charging, and it only finished a minute slower than the Sony. The iPhone clocking out at an hour and 50 minutes, as opposed to the hour and 49 minutes on the Sony. But remember the Sony does have a bigger battery than the iPhone, though it should kind of compensate with the faster 30 watt charging capabilities third place over here. The iPhone 12 Pro max with 1 hours and 50 minutes. It does have a very tiny battery, so it should definitely charge faster than this, though it took a hell of a long time to end off over there with the 20 watt block second place, the Xperia one mark 3 just a minute faster charging than the iPhone, but it does have a much larger battery and r 49 when it's not too shabby with 30 watt charging first place here.

The Samsung Galaxy s, 21 ultra, is still not exactly extremely fast charging, but an hour and 14 minutes is still pretty decent with that 5 000 William hour battery and 25 watt charging. Now, if we take a look at the last five percent of all devices over here, the Samsung did it in just eight minutes, getting a million power per minute. Reading of the last five percent at 31.3 Williams and the Sony did it in 18 minutes the last five percent that is getting a reading of 12.5 William hours per minute, and the iPhone took 26 minutes to the last five percent, getting 7.1 million power per minute reading, meaning the iPhone takes the longest to charge the last 5 to 10 percent, though the Sony and iPhone were pretty much on par in terms of time, one hour, 49 minutes and one hour 50 minutes respectively. The Sony did have a much better William per minute reading of over 41 William hours per minute, as opposed to just over 33 William hours per minute on the iPhone. Since the Sony has a much bigger battery than the iPhone, it does have faster charging as well.

So you would expect the William hour per minute reading to be better on the Sony. What is strange here, though, is that the Sony doesn't have a better milliampere per minute reading, as opposed to the Samsung, which has slower charging at 25 watts and a bigger battery at 5 000 William hours, and it got a reading of 67.57 William hours per minute. So if you have to charge them from zero to 100, definitely go for the Samsung, considering it has a larger battery, so it will last longer throughout the day and charge faster at night. I hope that you guys enjoyed watching this video as much as I did making it. This is technic, and I'll catch you in the next one.

You.


Source : TechNick

Phones In This Article




Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu