Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Emulation Test GameCube PS2 N64 PSP PSX By TechTablets

By TechTablets
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Emulation Test GameCube PS2 N64 PSP PSX

So it's about time. I got on to some emulation performance with some of these devices that I review and what a great time to test out, of course, emulation performance on the new Samsung Galaxy tab, s7, plus that I have so. This does have the more potent revised snapdragon, 865, plus slightly higher clocks, slightly improved performance. But how will the tab s7 plus here handle some demanding emulation so PlayStation 2, game cube, PSP and PSX, and a few others before I jump into the performance that you can expect here from emulation just a little quick outline here of our tablet. So we have a beautiful Samsung super AMOLED panel in this one 12.4 inches. The resolution is 1752 by 2800 120 hertz 650 nits maximum brightness.

It is so fast. So what can we expect from this particular system on a chip here? So I do have CPU z in the background just to point out that, with this particular one here, we've got, of course the snapdragon 865 plus faster turbos. Now it is now 3.09 gigahertz and the arena 650 graphics now goes up to 670. So it's a little quicker. A roughly like a 10, sometimes a little layer, sometimes a little more boost here compared to the snapdragon 865.

This one, of course, the plus being the refresh model now a couple of benchmarks here. So this is the slingshot extreme score here, so nearing 7 000 points excellent result and then the slingshot extreme, which is Vulcan so OpenGL, and then the Vulcan scores so just to compare that to your existing device to see how much of a bump up in performance. You are getting geek bench five score here: very good single core score: they're, almost getting close now to a thousand points, a multi-core score, edging up towards 3 000 excellent, and here is the an tutu score as well. If you're interested its version 8.4.3, and it gets a really decent, GPU score nice little bump up compared to say the 855, 855 plus, and even the 865. This, of course, just been the refresh model here now: internal storage, UFS, the respect and what I do have with my model is only 128 gigabytes.

Okay, uh you've has three is quick. You can see sequential reads and writes now: the rights and the random writes will be faster if you do buy the 256 gigabyte model, or you get the 512 gigabyte model. Those two models also come with the eight gigabytes of ram. I just have the base model here, so this is the minimum kind of performance you can expect. So we'll start out with probably the lightest and easiest one here, no things like main they're even light, and there's no point me showing that, because this one's going to play it flawlessly, but I will test out e PSE, which is a PlayStation emulator here, and we'll see how this one performs so with wipe out is one of the first titles so wipe out performing very, very quick and yes, my gameplay is terrible.

I've been playing these games in so long. I forgot kind of how hard this is on some of those other tracks and circuits here very difficult to control. So, even though the frames per second is reporting at the whole time 60, I do actually see a noticeable little dip just now and then like, it seems to lag, but it's not being reported all time out almost push challenge. This was a great game. Back in the day.

Remember when it first came out, people were just going wow. Look at that graphics, it's so lifelike, it's amazing, but it was for backhand. When was it 97 running fine 60 frames per second very solid, see if I can take this corner properly? Oh, not so good, m64, plus FM emulation here very good, I'm 32 frames per second. There are some noticeable legs, so I'm just running this with the default settings. You can probably tweak it a little to get slightly better performance.

This area differently is lagging a little, so Super Mario 64. So this one is running at a solid 30 frames per second, it occasionally dips down a little, but it's normally pretty good performance from this. One more comment: no issues with this one very, very quick here at 60 frames per second PlayStation portable emulation with pp SSP. So I've got my PlayStation portable right here and all the save games. They just actually work with this emulator, it's fantastic, so I've gone in and seen that oh okay, I've got a relatively high level Zach right here, I'll just quickly show you some gameplay I'll get out of this jump into one of those battles, but the graphics looks good at even the three times scaled up.

PSP resolution is what I'm running. So, of course, this is a steady, solid, 30 frames per second using that higher PlayStation portable resolution. No real problem here at all, and I can't believe how good this looks still even in 2020 such an old title, going to warm. So this one is an old title. Cause 2006, and it still looks amazing, plays amazing for an old title, and it's at a steady, 60 frames per second here, as you can see taken 6 now, so this one does run at the lower PSP resolution.

So it is 60 frames per second I'll. Just jump into a challenge right here, still looking very good and a solid 60 frames per second with this one I lost I'll, do game cube emulation now this is using dolphin emulator, so I don't have any other settings changed apart from this the way I have this one to autofit with the aspect ratio just so it wasn't like sitting right in the middle here with this particular title, so it is actually a steady 30 frames per second, which is great and very, very playable here. No, he is not a zombie, this particular guy here, so I've got to escape and fight a few locals. Let's see if the frame is going to dip right down here, just jump out through the window, all right bring it on. Oh, she's got me or he should.

I say: okay, see, the whole time is going to be playable. I notice that sometimes, when you do look around in Irish areas of the village, what not you get occasional little framed it, but I mean this is excellent performance here from the snapdragon 865 plus, not a problem. Furthermore, I think there's still one more local, oh yeah. There we go all right, they are dealt with so caliber 2, so this game cube title did run at 60 frames per second, so it should be a solid 60 here. I hope so, let's find out, so I'm going to do a well just quick game here survival, and hopefully this should be very playable.

I don't expect to be any issues here with the performance, so 60 frames already, and what are any dips? No. This is looking perfect, very, very promising. Not a problem see this is just a steady 60 here, so it handles the game. Cube rail I mean dolphin is an excellent emulator. They have really aced this one that didn't take too long Super Mario sunshine.

This one should be a little more demanding so could have possible, lags with this, we'll just check and see how it runs. So I did encounter a little of lag here, just especially at the starting when it loaded in it drops to about 24 frames per second, but over. This is quite smooth and really, I think, about the best performance. You can expect from game cube emulation here tiny bit of lag here and there you see down to 30 20. Sorry, three frames per second, not super quick, now on to PlayStation 2 emulation.

So this is diamond 2 pro and I do have the game settings on the fastest frame rate option right here: okay and with the ticking six you'll see that uh well, it's showing that at 60 frames per second. This is kind of like playing in slow motion here, so the most demanding emulation here on android that I will be showing in this particular video and playable yeah, but it's just a real pain. How slow this is feels like it's in slow motion. So let me know in the comments if there is some sort of tweak or some sort of hack, that I need to apply to get this to run at full speed, because it's just really annoying having it like this. Okay, pretty obvious that we're going to have amazing performance with things like made, okay, so cap com play system two play system, one main Atari, Amiga, Commodore 64.

Everything like that is gonna, be super playable. On such hardware, without any problem, so that's why I didn't cover it: those real old, gen, stuff, old school systems, now but PlayStation. Okay, that was just flawless performance. PlayStation, is very fast and smooth PlayStation portable performance. Great, exactly how I remember really with my PS slim back in the days and great, to see my save games transferred over.

Of course, I worked that pass emulator. It is a very, very good emulator, so make sure you check it out if you used to be really into your PlayStation portable games, that is so. What are n64 flawless, very, very good. Game cube amazing performance. There really great to see PlayStation 2 uh, not so great there.

Now. I know I didn't cover dream cast and many others that I could have, but it's just to give you an idea what to expect performance-wise. So do you want to see more emulators covered emulations should I say, covered in the channel I'll. Let me know because it's something I used to be really into, and I kind of just dropped doing it because well, it's its could cause problems for the channel. Let's just put it that way, and it did in the past for me and that's why I kind of dropped it, but anyway make sure you do check out the unboxing and in-depth first hands-on.

Look at this particular fantastic tablet here from Samsung, I'm working towards the full review, and it's going to be a gaming review as well with the current play, store titles. Some titles that support the 120 frames per second refresh rate as well just to see how they run. Will we run into some starter or lags with some of those very demanding, say technology benchmarks as well will be tested in that one and even a bit of streaming with steam too, to see how it's stream streaming performance so make sure you check out and subscribe to the channel for those up and coming videos?.


Source : TechTablets

Phones In This Article




Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu