Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Pixel 3a Camera Comparison By Daniel Sin

Today we're going to cook for the galaxy has 20 versus the pixel 3 I know it's a budget for us reflection phone. So it's pretty unfair, but pixel 3. It does take flagship quality photos. So this is the Lola test or the front-facing, camera and I know. The s20 is a bit sluggish during really low light. So I just want to see how well it can perform against a budget phone for push multi both do a perfect job.

It just depends on the white balancing, because sometimes the Samsung is a bit off and sometimes the pixel is a bit off and during this time when we have to wear masks, the Samsung as xx tends to be finicky because on the screen it says it's ready to take push mode. But when I do if it's not even working, and sometimes it does work. So it's really on and off on a pixel, it's really zoomed in and since it's a single lens, that's all the option you have and when you want to take something in your hands, it's pretty close up on pixel. The Samsung does have a telephoto option, so you can zoom in if we need more reach. But again, if you are taking a picture of something in your hands on the Samsung, you probably wouldn't even use a telephoto feature anyways, because sometimes it just doesn't get the focus right on a pixel array.

You can still zoom in portrait mode to get a bit more close up for the pixel. Using portion mode is easy because you just point shoot, and it does all the work for you, whereas on a stamp song you would have to move around a bit until the screen says it's ready. But for my experience it's really quick to recognize a lot of objects. So it's not a big deal now. Moving on to everyday situations, the Samsung S 20 is kind of read about a1 because it has three camera lenses, and you can zoom all the way up to 30 X on a Samsung s, 20, which I don't think is really useful to take pictures of, but just to see things on a pixel 3.

You can zoom all the way in and do it max zoom in it's still pretty good. It's not super sharp and, of course it doesn't beat out. The Samsung by the software is doing a perfect job, trying to keep the imager looking the best as possible for HDR on your Samsung is a bit inconsistent. Sometimes it looks great, and sometimes it's a bit dark on a pixel 3, since the software is doing all the work, a lot of it will stay consistent. So usually you would get a well exposed picture for a low light.

I would avoid using the ultra-wide angle lens on a Samsung s 20. It won't give you the best results. If you're in a city with a bunch of lights, then it should be okay, but it was still not going to beat out the main camera lines when you're zooming in into the pictures I really like how 2 3 8 does a good job, keeping everything and almost or even sometimes beating out the Samsung s20, and it's only when you go past 3x after that, when you go to like 5x or 7x or whatever, that pixel 3/8, the software spotless up the noise and artifacts and stuff. So that's when it looks better than the s20 being on 3x now for the performance, even though the Samsung is 20 to have to new a powerful chip, the pixel theory is still pretty smooth and in really low light situations. The same thing as 20 gets really sluggish.

When you hit the shutter button or even in night mode, it does take some time for it to do its work, so the pixel theory seems to beat out on that in that certain time now, moving on to night mode, they both do make a difference, and you can see it. The brightness is increased by a lot, and sometimes they both look pretty fake without the night mode. The pixel 3 pictures are hideous, and it's really noisy, not too sharp, but after using the night mode, everything seems to be almost cleaned up and if you want to see the night mode pictures right after both of them do have to process. So it does take a while like about 2 seconds, and then you can see the full picture now. Moving on to video, the pixel 3 can only go up to 4k 30 and for stabilization.

The ultra white on a Samsung is probably one of the best ones I've ever used the pixel through a seems to be really Cherokee like when I'm panning around it looks like it's trying to catch up to, where my hand is moving to for the main camera lens on a Samsung s, 20, it's smoother when I'm painting around, but as I'm walking straight I realized that I can see more of my handheld movement on a pixel as long as I'm holding straight and walk straight. It's a look like it's more stable than s.20 HDR is pretty similar on both I would say: the Samsung is a bit better and the color is a bit off on both to the pixel is to blue and those times.20 is slightly greenish. Yellow 4k 60 is an option for the Samsung S 20. The stabilization is, of course, jerky, and it looks like it's off, but it is nice to have if you want to do some slow motion or just slow down your footage. Next up is a K and both for K 60 and a K.

You can only use the main camera lens. You can't use auto white or telephoto, but panning around is so smooth it in a pixel 3, a's less jerky, but in nighttime, when your penny too fast, you can start to see a stutter, and it just doesn't look too good. So it's best when you're using it during daytime and moving on to low-light as 20 is the winner. Here there are a lot less market jitters and when I'm panning around it doesn't give off that slow, shutter speed. Look now I will say.

In my experience, the pixel phone is probably up there with terms of video, even though it's not meant to be or has the best video, but for micro, jitter wise is one of the cleaner ones. So overall Samsung is 20 is great for the people who don't want a lot of options and priority, whereas the Pixel 3a they're good for the average people who just want to take a picture, and it just looks good, and it's really simple to use, even though it's a budget phone, and it cost like three times as cheap, it still takes quality photos like flagship photos. So that is my comparison. I hope you guys enjoyed it. Follow me on Instagram, give a like subscribe hit the bell, and thanks for watching.

Source : Daniel Sin