Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Galaxy A80 Comparison By The MK Guy

Hey guys welcome back to my channel, so this Samsung's Galaxy, a 95 G, is out in Europe, so in this video I'm going to compare the 90 with the LEE 80, while in terms of the price, the 90 is at about seven hundred and thirty dollars compared to six hundred dollars for the brand-new Galaxy, an 80. So starting off with the construction on both phones, it will be aluminum frame and curved glass back. Unlike the 70 and the 50 which have plastic bodies and the 90 will have 3d refracting patterns on the back compared to a single plain color on the 80, the screen size will be the same, which is six point. Seven inches diagonally and going to have the same aspect: ratio as well, so as for the overall size, both will be the same in your hand and both are pretty large, while the 80 will be slightly thicker and heavier than the 90 in terms of the bezels again, not inaudible, difference same side bezels along with the top and bottom bezels. So the only difference from the front side will be that notch on the 90 on both phones, stuffing up and scanner, will be in screen optical scanner and in this department. Samsung is slightly slow, but not that slow.

Also and the 80 won't have the face unlock feature. While the 90 will have it. Both phones will have USB type-c port for connectivity, but both are also lacking the headphone jack. There will be a single loudspeaker on the bottom side and both and both does not have any certified protection against water, but the 80 will be more vulnerable to water because of so many moving parts. The display is super similar on both, so it's Super AMOLED and both with resolution of Full HD so same screen sharpness, which will be good.

Both of these screens will be pretty good in terms of quality, not as bright as the Norton and the s10 screens, but very comparable to the North, 9 and s9 screens means very bright and so very high contrast, but still both does not support HDR 10 content, the always-on display will be there on pot and both will be protected by it. Going like close now to the performance aspects, and this is where, at the 90 docks it's having this nav lag and 8:55 inside compared to the scenario again 7:30 on the AAT. So now they use the 90 is gonna, be snappier and more fluid than the AAT, and by that I mean it's gonna, be among the fastest Android phones of 2019. While the AAT is having pretty forced CPUs as well, but in terms of 3d and graphics, the 90 will be fair heads. The 90 will run all the heavy games on high settings, but on the AAT the asphalt 9 will lag.

So this means the upcoming games can also lag on in the RAM will be six or eight gigabytes on the e90 compared to just eight on the 80, and both phones will have 128 gigabytes of internal storage and as for expanding the storage on the 90, this six gigabyte, RAM agent, will have the micro SD card slot, while the 8 gigabyte variant will not have it and the 80 does not have the micro SD card slot on any of the variants and at loss. Both phones will be running one UI, so same user interface and both will get the Android 10 obtained. Now. As for the cameras on both phones, the main sensor will be 48 megapixel quad via sensor with same aperture size. So both of these will output, 12, megapixels images and the image quality will be very similar in good, like that perform good.

It had good detail and great dynamic range, while it did struggle in low-light so from the 90 which is more expensive than the 80 expect. The same results good in good lighting, but not among the best low-light performance, while both phones will have the long exposure night modes which drastically improves the night shots. The wide angle sensor on both phones will have 120 degrees of field of view and going to be 8 megapixels in resolution. So grateful of you, but this sensor also struggles in low-light and at lost. It hurt sensor on the 9th we'll be irregular depth sensor verses on the AAT.

It will be our time of flight camera so subject. Separation will be excellent on the 80 imported shots, while not bad portraits on the 92. As for video capture, its 4k on both, but the frame rate is same as well, which is 30fps. The 90 could have had the 48 60 FPS because of the high performance is p on the snapdragon effort 5, but it does not and for stabilization both of these does not have our yes, so electronic stabilization will only work in lower resolution and for heavy-duty stabilization. Both phones will have the super, steady mode which will record in 1080p slow motion capture on both phones will be at 240fps means 8 times slower, and the super slow motion will be at 480 fps and both will capture it for 0.4 seconds. But the playback of this super slo-mo will be of 8 seconds.

Only 80 means 16 times slower versus of 12 seconds on the 90 means 32 times slower. So this also means the 90 will use Sofia and AI so that the resultant payback does not look choppy and laggy and at loss. The 80 will have the portrait video feature, which is not confirmed for the 90, but this thing is also becoming more software dependent than having a dedicated 3d TOF sensor on the 90. We have a 32 megapixels selfie camera, which will output in 8 megapixels compared to the same 48, megapixels main sensor of the 80 on the front side as well. So here easily the 80 will be ahead in terms of everything, good detail, good dynamic range, lesser noise and so itself is 123 degrees of will of you on the front side on the 84 group selfies and a dedicated flash as well, and if you're thinking about its durability, its super strong and not bake or go wrong at loss.

The battery capacity is significantly larger on the e90 compared to the AAT. So the screen on time will definitely be more on the 90 during light usage. Both phones will discharge at a same rate, but during gaming the 90 will discharge at a faster rate because of its powerful and power-hungry CPU and GPU. But still the screen on time will be more on the 90, because the difference in capacity is very larger. But if you use 5g on the 90, then I cannot say for sure and at loss for charging.

Both phones will come with 25 watts chargers, but both phones might take the same amount of time to fully recharge because the AAT, in spite of its smaller battery and same charger, that the same amount of time to recharge as the 70 which has 4500 me amperes battery same as the 90 and a 25 volt charger. So this is it for this video guys. Let me know what you guys think about both handsets and if you found this video interesting then be sure to please like it and I will see you guys in my next video peace out.

Source : The MK Guy