Samsung Galaxy A70 vs Galaxy A80 | Comparison! By Kevin Riazi

What is going on everyone. My name is Kevin, and today we're doing a quick comparison and showdown between two of Samsung's hottest, selling, mid-range phones, the Galaxy, a 70 and the Samsung Galaxy, an 80 we're going to find out if the 880 is worth shelling out that extra money for is it really the better device and for that extra money, what features do you get? Let's start with an overview, both Galaxy devices have nearly an identical footprint, but in the hand the heft of the AAT is very noticeable. The 70s back comprises all plastic materials. It kind of gives off a rainbow effect, reminiscent of the note 10, but it's not nearly as premium in person. AAT takes use of a glass plating and metals, specifically aluminum around the frame and in the moving components for the camera slider. This pop-up module is what allows the phone to have an oculus design.

Now Nautilus is super cool, but it does come at a cost that slide up motor. That Samsung uses to hide the front camera and pop up is actually slow. It's so slow in fact, that Samsung opted to take out face unlock as an authentication method, and instead we're left with the on-screen fingerprint scanner. The two devices share these same 393 pixels per inch, Super AMOLED technology and an aspect ratio of 20 by 9. It's important to mention that neither device has dual speakers, and while the audio quality and the volume has been good in my use, it can easily be covered up with a finger on the bottom.

The difference in these phones are in the camera's battery life and the performance. The 70 is rocking a snapdragon 675 with the Adrian 612, whereas the AAT has the upgraded 730 chipsets with arena 618. Both devices are outscore, but the AAT is clocked ever so slightly higher and edges out my a 70s 6 gigabytes of ram with an additional 2 gigabytes of RAM on top making it 8 now the galaxy 70 does. How is the bigger 4,500 million power battery as opposed to the 80s 3700 Williams? The difference is 800 Williams, but the real difference is actually in battery efficiency, where the 70 also takes. The win in real world use.

This translated to me getting an extra hour and a half of screen on time. These devices charge up through USB-C and they both come with the 25 watt charging adapter, which is superfast to charge. The phones up, my a 70 actually came with a free hundred and twenty-eight gigabyte micros card, which I wasn't expecting because it wasn't on the Amazon listing, but free stuff is always appreciated, and the phone can support up to 512 gigabytes of micros storage internally. Here is the kicker, though the AAT doesn't even have expandable storage, no micro, SD card slot and there's no headphone jack. So that aside, let's talk about the everyday performance of these devices.

The boot up test winner goes to the AAT unsurprisingly, but once it's up and running most of my tasks performed at roughly the same speed, those two exceptions: opening up the camera app and gaming. The 80s camera app loaded, much faster every time when I hop into a mobile game with high settings. That is also where the 70 will fall shortly behind at medium settings. We're talking about a marginal drop of only a few frames per second I'm happy to report that neither phone had issues heating up while gaming. In my experience, the better graphics performance of the Adrian 618 is no surprise, but is it enough to justify the extra cost for you that might all come down to the camera comparison? These two phones have very different looking cameras, but the actual sensors themselves are very comparable, starting with the front camera, I prefer taking selfies on the 80s flip module, the sharpness, colors contrasts and exposure all looked better on here, and it has the option to record 4k video for the front camera, an option which isn't available on the 70 in some instances, I prefer the results of the rear camera from the cheaper phone, but more often than not the AAT hit the focus and sharpness better.

Neither device has optical image stabilization, but the software processing makes videos usable, of course, the stock camera app is optimized, and it's the fastest for processing times and general ease of use. But a lot of you will prefer using an alternative app to take photos like Google camera for favorable quality in the end result. So you might be surprised there aren't as many compromises to make if you're going for the cheaper Galaxy, a7 II and after having used these devices for a long time. I can personally tell you that I'll be sticking with the 70 and saving the difference of cost for more accessories, like the Galaxy watch, active 2, which I will be reviewing soon, I've already reviewed, both phones on. So, if there's anything that I didn't cover in this video that will most likely be in my review, video of each, but that wraps up my comparison, guys for the Galaxy 880 and the galaxy a 70.

Thank you guys so much for watching this video and, as always, I'll talk to you in the next video.

Source : Kevin Riazi