Samsung Galaxy A51 Camera Test VS Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Impressive! By Izzi Boye

So I took out the Samsung Galaxy 51 and the Galaxy Note m+ for a camera showdown as I like to see how the 851 first against a flagship device such as the Galaxy Note 10. What is up guys is he here and welcome to my channel if you haven't already, please click on that subscribe button before we continue should note that the Samsung Galaxy II 51 cannot possibly compare with the Galaxy Note m+ they're, not in the same league. The note M, plus the farm at fast-food, so performance wise, the 51 doesn't stand a chance, but since the 51 has interesting camera specifications I'd like to see how it fares with the Galaxy Note S camera, the 51 is $300 phone, while the Samsung Galaxy Note m+ is a $1000 phone way more. Expressing that a 51 body, camera specifications on a 51 is actually interesting and makes you think it might just be as good as the camera on flagship devices. When it comes to picture quality, both devices have a 4 camera setup. At the back, the 51 has a 48 megapixel main camera, a 12 megapixel ultra-wide 5 megapixels, dedicated macro camera, 5 megapixel depth sensor and a tip 2 megapixel front camera.

Why did not M, plus a 12 megapixel main camera, 12, megapixel, telephoto, lens 16 megapixels, also wide time off lights and so and 10 megapixel front camera enough with the numbers? Now, let's get into the real deal, so I took some photos with both of these devices, so I'm going to display them on the screen. Right now see if you can guess correctly, which phone took which photos we'll start with the rear cameras for the first three photos. We have the Samsung, Galaxy Note, M, plus on the left and a 51 on the right, but this fourth photo was taken with the e 50 ones. Macro camera, that's the one we have on the left and on the right we have the camera of the Samsung Galaxy note, M, plus now onto the selfie camera below the Samsung Galaxy note, M plus has a 10 megapixel selfie cam around the 851. Has the 2 megapixel camera.

So does the megapixel count really make a difference in this comparison? No? Let's not talk about night mode, the foot or socks in this department, but I guess you want to see it so here it is I told you it sucks. Now, video recording with the front facing camera on both of these devices, the 51 and Galaxy Note M plus shoot 4k videos at 30 frames per second on the front-facing camera. This is a sample in those with less lighting and both cameras in to do really. Well, we have the note M plus on the left and the 8051 on the Wrights, impressive rights I. Think so too.

How about outdoors with the front-facing camera colors on the patient's body to be more marks? Let me know what you think: the rear camera on woody 51 and the Galaxy Note m+ shoots 4k videos, but the 51 only shoots up to 30 frames per second yd. No template shoots up to 60 frames per second. These are the camera samples with what we've seen so far. What do you think about the galaxy 1/5 Moore's camera I'll? Leave you to be the final judge in the comment section but, in my opinion, for $300 device. The camera is quite impressive, and it comes close to the Galaxy Note II m+ camera the photos not to the 851, where almost as good as those maps with the Galaxy Note stealth loss, even though the extra megapixels did not exactly make just the best.

But you don't want to compare $300 from within $1000 phone and expected 300 elephants to be doing $1000, for if you get what I mean. So how would you rate the galaxy if you towards camera, when compared to the Galaxy Note cell plus, let me know in the comments section and also how many of these photos were you able to guess correctly? Also, let me know in the comment section don't forget to hit the thumbs up. If you liked this video I'll see you in the next one peace.

Source : Izzi Boye