Samsung A20s Durability Review- Did Sammy take A20 BEND FAIL Seriously? WATER|SCRATCH|DROP|PUBG By CNTechRoom

Let's have a quick look at the build quality of the Samsung Galaxy, a 20 which most probably had the weakest, build quality and plastic design made by Samsung and tested on the channel. As you can see, Samsung a 20 had not done particularly well due to its weak design and build quality. So in this video, let's test out the hardware, performance and structural integrity of the galaxy, a 20s is Samsung, taking this test seriously and have they improved the build quality for its loyal consumers. Like the improvements seen on latest Sami and Radial, vices Samson goes back to the galaxy a 20s six months after the debacle of the galaxy a 20. So it will be interesting to see if they have actually worked on improving the newer, a 20s with a stronger build or have they just kept the same weak design of the galaxy, a 20, the galaxy. A 20s has slight improvements over the 20, mainly with a better quality, sir in the budget range and the presence of a triple camera setup as compared to dual cameras on the 20, though this time the 20s has an LCD screen.

Apart from that, the rest pretty much remains the same with the four thousand William s: battery dedicated 1tb memory card slot, rear fingerprint scanner and USB type-c charging port. Another important difference is fake. Note off is the weight of the Samsung a 20s. This time is 183 grams, which is comparatively a bit of lighter, then some 190 to 200 gram devices, but is a full 14 grams heavier than the 169 grams galaxy a 20, and thankfully it seems to at least not feel weak in my usual trial Bend. Now before the drop test, let's have a quick look at the general and gaming performance of the Samsung, a 20s for you guys who also want to know if it's lower than mid-range device can gain a for throws, who want a secondary form.

The 20s is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 position in combination with a denim 506 GPU, which is just about okay for a less than moderate user or light user. It is certainly not the fastest device at this price range with noticeable lags and slowness in the UI, especially noticeable. If you have gotten used to processes like the Snapdragon 650 5 7 12 /, but if you can overlook the lack of smoothness and lag during heavy gameplay, then the 20s is just about playable at the lowest graphic settlements, certainly not recommended for heavy game history. The last sensing device to completely failed a top test was the galaxy, a 70s where the AMOLED display had suffered total damage. So, let's find out if the LCD on the 20s that's better than that, performing the drop test on the 20s with an ordinary case and tempered glass from different angles.

First, from pocket, Hey to save our drops on marble from pocket, make the Samsung a 20s seems to handle the abuse value now for the six drop from six feet NI from different angles. It is good news that a galaxy eight 90s did pretty well in the drop this apart from just my neck tracks, at the edge of the glass production, the 20s crosses the test without suffering any internal or external damages like to the camera unit or display next in the stress test to know the scratch-resistant capabilities of this unnamed tempered glass production provided by the brand by rubbing it with common atoms found in pockets and the blade of a heavy-duty box cutter Samsung have mostly had a good track record in my stress tests with high quality, scratches in Corning Glass with oleo phobic coating, and the same can be said of cheaper budget Redmi devices with Corning Glass protection. On the other hand, most devices tested on the channel in the budget range of oppos VIVO and Realme with pre-applied faster screen, predictors a highly scratch prone and are not able to handle the bleed. So will the provided glass production on the Samsung Galaxy? Eight, only s be able to keep up this tradition as suspected earlier, apart from a little hell and stretches the glass production on the galaxy. A 20 s is similar to the quality of Corning Glass production and passes.

Miss fastest points to remember is that the eight only s is not water resistant and does not have official IP rating. Another thing is that the sim 3 does not have a rubber seal on it, something which some budget devices from other brands do provide for some degree of water resistance testing as usual for the presence of an oleo phobic coating on this unnamed tempered glass production. As of now, it is not yet officially listed on the corning website and usually takes some time for it to show up on the site. Coming back to the auto phobic coating, this layer is mostly absent on devices with pre-applied screen predictors, but other than that it is generally present even on lowest priced budget devices like retina. It helps to lessen finger man smudges and, as you can see, his presence is proved when water rolls off the glass surface in the form of droplets.

Instead of lying flat on glasses, without a roller for be clear, most commonly the first thing to get affected on non Waters ton devices is the volume and distortion of sound. The distorted, low audio can last for a few seconds on some devices, but can also prolong for several hours which can permanently damage. The sound of the display unit and Samsung devices tested on the channel have not particularly done well in this regard, other than that devices can suffer from screen, flickering issues or the display may go blank for several hours, or it might suffer total and permanent display damage like in the Asus before 5 Z, although recently tested, let me know they buy the display at permanently gone blank in the lights flashing known, it is kind of surprising that the galaxy, a 20s keeping Samson's track record in mind, has performed this well in the last hybrid wrenching round. He passes my water test with ease and suffers no liquid damage of any kind. Now, moving on to fun stuff with value the pen test, which gives you a clear idea about the build quality of devices, has Samsung made any structural changes to the Galaxy, a 20s, especially after the massive structural failure of the 820.

As some of you might be aware that the a20 had broken down with moderate amounts of pressure from the first burn itself, but unlike the a20, the 20s has managed to handle high amounts of force from the display side, with no visible signs of damage, cracking noises or screen separation, though it did suffer from a light amount of permanent Bend, and it is the same thing also. When pressure was applied from the back side. The third pends did manage to create a bit of gap in between the screen and the volume buttons, but ultimately it locks out suffering. No further damage Samsung seems to have taken the Ben test fields of soft plastic devices, seriously like the 50 Na 70 and specially improved upon the weakest, build of the 20. This ultimately should benefit us in the long run and ensure that the consumers continue to get better quality bills.

The Samsung Galaxy 20 passes my Ben test pretty convincingly due to its improved design and build quality.

Source : CNTechRoom