Realme X3 Superzoom vs iPhone SE 2020 / OnePlus 8 / OPPO Find X2 / vivo X50 Pro -Battery Drain Test By C4ETech

Recently we did a charge test with some of the most popular launches in the last two months and guess what today it's time to drain him: hey guys ash here from c4e Tech and if you do end up finding this video useful, then please consider subscribing and turning on notifications by hitting that Bell icon. Let's now get started, we have the same lineup of phones as before. So if you haven't seen that previous charge test video, here's a card to it, go ahead check it out. Now, if you have seen it I'm, pretty sure you'd recognize these phones since they're. In the same order left to right. It's the iPhone I see the 2020 edition the VO x50 Pro, the OnePlus say it the Realme x3 super zoom and finally, the OPPO find x2.

Of course, we have the trusty Poco f1 as a stopwatch again in order to make this test as realistic as possible. We've set these phones to their maximum resolution as well as refresh rates. That means it's 120 Hertz on the Realme x3 super zoom, as well as the OPPO find x2 90 Hertz for the 1 plus 8 and the VIVO X 50 pro and, of course, 60 Hertz, for the iPhone same for the resolutions to oppose that quad, HD, plus the restaurant, full HD plus and, of course, iPhone 80, plus that's the maximum so yeah. Now this intro has dragged on long enough. So let's try and straight into the test.

All the phones are at 100%, and we match the brightness and let's kick things off with some Instagram going to the explore page and setting it up so that we have a nice mix of photos and videos and now, when the magic of editing, let's jump forward, 30 minutes and see how our phones are powering whoa. The iPhone asked well, as the expert be pro they've not lost a single percentage. The one plus 8 is at 98. The x3 super zoom is at 97 OPPO find x2 holding strong at 99. Let's now go on over to YouTube and let's binge-watch, some c4 attack videos.

Okay, it's been an hour of YouTube time not to check on the percentages. The iPhone SE 20/20 is that 90%, the VIVO X 50 Pro, it's at 94%, the OnePlus say at 92, the x3 super zoom 90 and the find x to 91. Despite having the smallest battery, the iPhone SE seems to be holding up just fine, thus far, I'm guessing it's the 7, an ohmmeter the ling Bionic, combined with that smaller and low resolution screen. That's basically the reason. Next, let's crack things up a notch with an hour of high octane as well gameplay, let's see how our phones, batteries are doing 2 hours, 30 minutes into the test, the iPhone it's at 77%, the VIVO X 50 pros at 87%, the OnePlus 884 and both 3?m ex3 super zoom, and the OPPO find X 281, I kind of expected this, since the VIVO X 50 Pro, does have the highest capacity battery at 43.15 million power next is the OnePlus and for three hundred mill ampere and finally, we have the x3 super zoom and find X 2, both 4200 mAh enough of asphalt, though let's change things up with some Baby. Well, we ran it for an hour straight and at the end of it here are the numbers: iPhone 55 % x, 50, pros 76% OnePlus, 873 x3 super zoom 68 finally find x2 69.

Ok, this was kind of surprising since I expected to find x2 2 trained quicker. After all, the screen sizes on both phones is similar. Both are also clocked at 120 Hertz, which is why they are training faster than the rest of the androids. But- and this is a pretty big, but the find x2 is that quad, HD plus well, the Realme is at full HD plus anyways. Let's now pepper these phones with the 5 continuous rounds, a fan to do it's been 4 hours at 19 minutes, and here are the battery stats.

The iPhone has dropped to just 26% the X 50 Pro is doing the best out of a lot at 62%. Next is the 1 plus Zeta at 56, and finally, we have the x3 super zoom undefined x2 neck-and-neck at 46 and 47 percent respectively. Now. What struck me as interesting here is that both the 1 plus and the VIVO have similar sized this place. The battery capacity differs by only 15 milliamperes, that's less than 0.3 percent, and even the refresh rate and panel types are the same 90 here. It's full HD, plus AMOLED, the only difference, those that we have the flagship, power-hungry 865 on the 1 plus 8.

Well, we've always had opted to go with the mid-range 765 G on the X 50 Pro. That 6% difference is probably due to the CPU power consumption quite surprising, since both CPUs are actually based on the latest 7 nanometer manufacturing known. Ok. So, let's see if our phones are up for one more hour of asphalt this time it is 5 hours and 19 minutes and honestly, the iPhone things aren't looking too rosy for it. It's at 13% the x50 Pro, it's still about over 50% juice, left to 1, plus a has just depth to the 50% mark.

The x3 super zoom and find x2 are at 35 and 36 percent respectively. One more round of Pusey should be enough to finish off the opponent yep, the iPhone SE. It gives up at 5 hours and 54 minutes. As for the rest, the x50 pro still has almost half its remaining capacity. The one plus 8 is at 40%, while the x3 super zoom is at 26 and the find x2 at 29%.

So let's now extrapolate the results. The pyx 50 Pro leads the pack 11 hours and 22 minutes. It's followed by the 1 + 8 9 nine minutes shot of 10 hours at third place is the find X, ?, 8 hours and 20 minutes, and at 4th place is the Realme x3 super zoom and 8 hours. The iPhone SE is an excellent phone and, like I said in my review, it's this abysmal battery life that lets it down the X 50 probe wins this due to the lower powered SOC. The 90 Hertz Full, HD, 1 +, coming in second place, was also something that I expected, but the quad HD + AMOLED touring find x2 edging out the full HD LCD x3 super zoom for 3rd place.

Now that was something that surprised me. What about you? Let me know in the comments below. Did you like watching this video? If you did maybe you'd like these two hey check them out, and before you go, how about heading that like and subscribe buttons go on? Do it I guess, that's it, thanks a lot for watching, and I'll catch, you guys in the next one bye, bye.

Source : C4ETech