Hi welcome to gizmo china, I'm Kieran. Six months after the launch of the Poco m3 model, Poco has launched an upgraded version. The m3 pro the m3 standard version is doing relatively well among many 4g entry-level phones. So can the m3 pro do well among entry-level 5g phones? We got the phone in advance to check out the brand's latest entry-level 5g phone, the m3 pro's appearance, differs from that of the m3 and clearly changes have been made once again. The lens module is still a vertical triple camera setup, but the large back, rectangular design has been removed. The m3 pro has a new back cover design with two rounded rectangles near the lens and the Poco logo inside the leather-like material on the back has been replaced with a mirror reflective coating, which is a fingerprint magnet.
Although this back cover pattern, design is pretty unique and beautiful. I still prefer the m3 standard design because it leaves a deeper impression. The fingerprint sensor is still on the side of the body and the m3 pro is not only equipped with a 3.5 millimeter, headphone jack and IR blaster, but it even features NFC, which is not present. On the standard version of the m3. However, we still found some minor drawbacks, such as the emission of the dual speakers from the standard version.
However, the m3 pro brings much needed screen upgrades, although it is still an LCD 1080p screen, the refresh rate is increased to 90 hertz and the water drop screen has also been replaced with a hole punch screen. The whole size is larger, but the surrounding shadows are better controlled. The screen looks rather average, but considering it is only a 5g entry phone to have a 90 hertz screen is already ahead of many other phones in the same price range. So our evaluation of the screen is this: it basically meets the needs of a customer in this price segment. The Poco m3 uses MTV's dimension, 700 soc, which is one of the entry-level 5g chips available.
So it makes sense to choose it. The phone scores 329 087 on an tutu, while in geek bench 5 single core tests, it scores 558 and in multi-core tests around 1734. This score is a little better than the m3 snapdragon 662, but not by much because it is an entry level chip. The gaming performance is not very good. PUBG has no way to turn on HDR, graphics and extreme frame rate and in HD graphics.
You can't turn on ultra frame rate, which means, if you want to play PUBG at 40fps. You have to turn on balanced graphics or smooth graphics. The good news is that it still plays smoothly with balanced graphics, genii and impact and bright rich turned out to be too much for this chip and even gentian impact on medium graphics and motion blur off the frame rate is still not high, and even though the temperature is only 42 degrees Celsius, there is still a decrease in the CPU frequency in the later stages. Bright ridge is only 12 fps on average, with the highest special effects. While it is not recommended playing these games on an entry level phone, it's still possible to play some games that don't require high performance such as PUBG.
The lens is still configurable, with a 48 megapixel main camera, plus a depth of field lens and a macro lens. There is no ultra-wide lens. The image style is relatively realistic, with moderate HDR intensity, but the colors of the flowers tend to spill over when AI is turned on the same situation of AI spoiling. The image also occurs in the evening. The control of highlights with AI on is not as good as with AI off, perhaps poke feels the brighter lights are more pleasing to the eye, but the best performance at night is still with the night mode.
The highlight control is better with AI off, but probably it's because of the limited ability of CMOS the detail. Part of the picture is still not much improved. One of the more pleasant surprises is the portrait mode because of the assistance of the depth of field lens. Keying errors are rare, even if the subject is not a person. The depth of field information can be correctly identified.
As for video, the m3 pro only supports 1080p and 720p 30fps recording, but there is image stabilization, so daily recording won't be a problem coming to the battery the Poco m3 pro is the same as the m3. It only supports 18 watt charging power, but the box is equipped with a 22.5 watt charger 18 watt charging power is still slow to fill the 5 000 William hour battery half an hour charges to 35 percent and one hour to 67. It takes 116 minutes to fully charge to 100. Weak soc performance also means more power. Saving half an hour of tick.
Took consume seven percent: half an hour of online video uses up six percent 23 minutes of pub g drains five percent and half an hour of Gandhi impact. Only around ten percent. This level of battery life is good for an entire day, so the m3 pro is polo's first entry-level 5g mobile phone this year. What do you think has it met your expectations compared with the m3? The main upgrade point of the m3 pro is the support for 5g and a high refresh rate of 90 hertz, although 5g may be of little use now to some users. If you plan to use the phone for two or three years, then 5g support can be a differentiating factor, so that's it for today I'm Kieran from gizmo china, and we'll see you next time.
You.
Source : gizmochina