OnePlus 8 60Hz vs OnePlus 8 90Hz By SpeedTest G

One of the constant myths I keep reading on the internet is that a smartphone with a 90 or 120 Hertz display will be faster than a device with a 60 Hertz display. Of course, it's absolutely rubbish. The refresh rate has nothing to do with the frame rate today we'll be testing the 1+8 running at 60 Hertz against the exactly same device. The 1+8 running at 90 hurts to see which one's faster, which one do you think will win. Well, let's find out okay, so we have the 1 plus 8 with sent reckon 865 on the left-hand side, and we have the 1 plus 8, with the subject of 865 on the right-hand side. They're both running in 1080p, but the difference is, is that the 1 I plus 8, on the left hand, side is running with a 60 Hertz refresh rate and the 1 plus 8.

On the right hand, side is running with a 90 Hertz, refresh rate. Of course, the refresh rate is how fast the display actually physically updates the pixels, not how quickly the processor manages to get new pixels to the device. If you're looking at a photograph, it will be updated at 60, Hertz and 90 Hertz, but actually there we're nothing changing on the screen, as we are now into the 16 thread test. I do think. I saw a minor lead there by the 1 plus 8 at 90 Hertz, as we are coming now to the end of the sitting straight as yes, there we go, and we're into the blur test of the 1 plus 8 with the 60 Hertz is slightly behind they're, both into the blur test.

Now, let's see what happens when we come out of that intervene from scoring this? Yes, the 90s version is still slightly ahead at this moment. What's going to happen when we get into the smoked part with this, let's have a look at this now. What's the run numbers going to be, on both the left hand, rub 28 29, 28 29, exactly the same on both sides as we go into you t-test, it's looking pretty much even at the moment, pretty much neck and neck down to the water. Let's see any landmarks here. Turning left going down to the water again is looking pretty much neck and neck here, as we go round to the end at the end of the very poor.

They both hit the value at the end, there's a key at the same time we're into the Unreal test. Will one of them and managed to get to the end of the forest scene first, which one will it be? Will it be the left or will it be the right always fractionally the left, one minute? Twenty-seven point: five versus one minute: twenty-seven point, nine point, four of a second: difference: okay, let's break down the scores and see what happen so, as you saw there for all in two and purposes the devices both finished at exactly the same time as we would expect, because the refresh rate of the display makes no difference. The actual numbers were one. Twenty-seven point: five versus one: twenty-seven point: nine. So in fact the sixty Hertz version was fractionally, faster, CPU, 38.9 versus thirty, seven point nine. So it seemed as if the one plus eight 90 hers was doing better in the CPU part.

Of course there it was hardly doing any display stuff whatsoever. Twenty-two point: five verses, twenty-two point: nine for the mix, CPU GPU and then twenty-six on the nose for the GPU for the sixty Hertz version, 27 on the nose for the ninety Hertz version. So overall you add them all up, not even half a second difference between them. So, as you can see, it makes no difference at all to the performance when I'm Kari Sims. This is speech.

Ag I really hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, please do give it a thumbs up and if you like this kind of videos well, why not stick around by subscribing to the channel? Ok, that's it I'll see you, man, Exxon.

Source : SpeedTest G