NOKIA 5.4 OVERVIEW – Unboxing & First Impression By HardReset.Info

Welcome and follow me, I have a Nokia 5.4, and today I'll go for unboxing along with an overview of this phone. So popping it straight open. You get the phone straight at the front, so just take it out, then here we just got some injection, nothing really special and then cable and charger. So cable is type c which is nice to see. We can basically see over here, so it's type c and the charger is, I believe, 10 watts yep. So you can see we're.

Hopefully it's visible, so it's basically 10 watts here, not the fastest charger. But oh well, let's take out the phone there we go so right at the back. We can see the display. Now I already did set up the device, so it can be done a little quicker. So right at the bottom, you can see the display, which is a six point.

Three nine inch display uh the same thing as ADI Nokia, 3.4 uh display, I believe, is basically almost identical to that one. So 6.39 720 by 1560 IPS, with an 81.9 screen to body ratio and 269 pixels per inch. So obviously the display won't be anything mind-blowing here, it's a standard uh, not the greatest display. That's basically what I can say about it now at the back when we flip it over. We have really nice looking back with this weird texture.

Now it is completely smooth, as you can see, uh kind of like glass, but you can see this texture like these lines, uh it kind of resembles something like a. I have one, the old mate 20, this one isn't necessarily smooth, but it basically looks really similar to that so um. Apart from that, we do have the fingerprint sensor right here and triple camera setup, actually quadruple camera setup with a flash on the side, and when it comes down to cameras, we do have a main sensor, which is a 48 megapixel wide sensor, 5 megapixels, ultra-wide 2, megapixel depth and macro now the two bottom ones which are depth and macro. I wouldn't really consider them to be cameras. Uh, usually they don't do anything good.

So it's a scummy way of basically racking up the account on your of cameras on your phone. Just so you can well. I guess bring up the price, these cameras cost literally nothing and yet uh. I wouldn't say this phone is worth uh 250 dollars, which is apparently what is being sold for um, but I'm pretty sure the reason why they made it a little higher is because of those two cameras because look at our gracious uh device, which is cheap for four cameras and whatever it's just trash here, let's be honest: uh those cameras are not usable, and I'm going to prove it. So, let's open up the camera and show how trash this is now I am using Russian right now, so let me actually change it.

So I do understand what I'm selecting. Hopefully I can find it quickly. There we go language that doesn't look perfect. Can I like change it? Apparently, not there. We go so now.

Let's, let's launch camera, so the main photo mode. The one that you usually take photos with is just going to be the typical 48 megapixel sensor. So these photos should look good now it does pop up with the macro. So you know what I'm gonna test it out. So I captured two different micro photos um because I didn't know if the first one is sharp, but I guess we're going to find out.

So this is to sue, that's bad um. This is terrible for a macro photo just saying this is the second one, it's even worse. Um yeah, it just looks like a blurry mess. Um then this is the 48 megapixel sensor. Now, obviously this does a better macro photo than the macro lens uh.

Now, as a comparison, you know what I'm I'm just gonna. I know this might not be very fair, but then, at this price range honestly uh, the phone that I have right here, the mate 20 pro is basically at this moment worth as much as this uh, with the difference as the photos here will be superior and basically every way. So just let's go with the macro just so you can see how it actually should look like. So there we go. We got a macro right here.

Um probably could even get it better, but it doesn't really matter here. Um like there is really no comparison. Now, let's actually go back to the macro. Just, just so, we have fair comparison. So here we go.

Oh well, we already maxed out on the zoom, so you can basically see almost every little detail on this photo while here we're looking like a blurry pile of crap here, a little less, but still it's its not usable for a macro, it's not usable for anything while this photo is just like. This is about a what four-year-old phone now three-year-old. I think something like that, and it outperforms the macro lens, the dedicated macro lens that we have right here in every way like I said it might not be the most fair comparison considering. That was a flagship back then, but still you can pick that phone up for basically the same price right now, which makes it differ. Why would you go for this one so uh? Obviously the mac.

The macro here is just absolute crash, and now, let's, let's move further to portrait, but that's another great lens here, and now it does some weird wonky things where, basically, you can change how lights look and darkness. I guess I don't exactly know you have a little of an image of how it will change it, so wow stars, um, hearts, butterflies, snowflakes and my favorite um, the teardrops, which are looking at the photos that are about to follow from the portrait mode. So uh, let's see I'm going to capture the photo right here. Let's see hello, would you like to focus? Maybe oh there we go. Oh, no! No, no, no! Focus! Okay! So that took me uh some problem just trying to capture an oh, that's bad, trying to capture a focus shot honestly when you zoom in the quality is not bad until you look at the things that are bad, like oh over here, um we're missing a little of the pine needles right here or just needles from the cactus uh, which basically, what it did is just kind of cropped it all around.

Where it thinks is uh the background and where it's not uh. Now that's the benefit of the 2 megapixel sensor uh. So you also get these amazing things like this right over here, uh. What the hell is this like? What like you basically have focus right here and then immediately just such an absolute blur mask that it's so bad companies that include their 2 megapixel depth. Crap sensors should just stop it because it is literally infuriating when you get to look at these photos and realize that hey my sensor, that I thought was a benefit is just actually ruining my photos.

That's basically what it does. So, honestly, if you have the choice, I would literally take the tape and just tape it up here, because those two sensors should never be used. They will only make your photos look worse than better if you want the macro use a 48 megapixel. If you want a both effect, then well you're out of luck, because I wouldn't really use anything past the natural both that you get from photos right here, so yeah cameras absolute trash, at least the two uh two megapixel ones. Now we do also have a 16 megapixel sensor on the front.

So let's open that up. So there is this one and again there's something wonky about it. It's again trying to do some blurry effect. It's just also not really clear um, it could be faulted of the light, but yeah it just looks weird. Furthermore, it did look weird on almost every Nokia that I tested uh today, so yeah, okay, so moving to actual like decent specs on this device for the price, we do get a snapdragon 662 uh, not the best one, not even close, but still the fact that I get a snapdragon and basically a mid-range one.

I would consider a decent value here. Then we have a couple different options with storage, so we have 64 gigabytes with four and six gigabytes, uh ram version and then 128, which apparently it's written- that that's four gigabytes, but I think it's the other way around. It should be, I think, six uh considering this is the higher storage, but I don't know- maybe Nokia decided to just kind of throw logic out the window now. You do also have the ability to expand your storage uh using a SD card right here, so you can get past the 64 or 128 gig storage, which is nice and on. Additionally, we do have access to things like NFC, so you can pay with the phone if you wanted, to which I consider that to be a really nice thing, we do have a headphone jack right at the top right here, type c port for charging, which again a nice thing here and outside that forty thousand, a mill, four thousand million per battery uh crappy 10 watt charging and a fingerprint on the back, and that's basically all that I should mention here not much more to say and honestly for the price.

I think a better alternative would be the Nokia 3.4, it's basically over a hundred dollars cheaper uh. This one comes at like about 250, while that one comes at around 150. So when we're considering the price difference, the other one will be, in my opinion, if we're looking for a budget device, for instance, will be better for the price uh offering almost the exact same stuff like here, as we can see here, maybe a little less less well well-built device in terms of how it feels because it will be plastic but other than that the screen will be the same. The cameras will be just as disappointing as this one, but they won't feel as disappointing uh because of the price difference uh. You basically have 13 megapixels.

That captures, I would say, respectable photos here or on the other one compared to this one and doesn't include two useless cameras, so that only includes one so yay. But honestly, if you're looking for a phone at this price range, 250 dollars, uh just keep on looking this one. I wouldn't say it's worth it. So that being said, if you found this very helpful, don't forget to like to subscribe, and thanks for watching you.

Source : HardReset.Info