Motorola Edge S vs S21 Ultra / Mi 11 / Reno5 Pro / vivo X60 Pro+ / iQOO 7 Battery Life DRAIN Test! By TechNick

All, six of these smartphones have released in 2021. Four of them are powered by Qualcomm's flagship, snapdragon, 888 chipsets, one of them house Qualcomm's latest CPU, the snapdragon 870, and one of them use MediaTek's value for money, dimension, 1000 plus chips, and they will all be going head-to-head today in a high refresh rate, real life battery drain test battle. We have the largest battery all the way, on the left hand, side being the brand new Motorola, HS and Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra, both with 5000 William hour batteries. Then we have the Xiaomi mi 11, with a 4 600 William hour cell, the Oppo Renault 5 pro with 4 350 Williams, with the smallest cells, all the way on the right hand, side being the recently released VIVO brothers, the x60 pro plus and iq7, with 4200 and 4000 William hour batteries respectively, all devices have been updated to their latest available. Software updates, and all of them here are rocking android 11. Today is all about testing the batteries when using their maximum available refresh rate options, and that is 90hz on the Motorola and Oppo device and 120hz on the Samsung.

Xiaomi VIVO and IQ the only devices here capable of hitting who plus is the Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra and Xiaomi mi 11, but I'm going to be bringing them back down to full HD plus to match the rest of the devices. Here you might be able to purchase five Motorola edges instead of one galaxy s21 ultra, but can the motor come out on top with the same battery capacity? And how does it stack up to these very efficient five nanometer snapdragon 888 powered smartphones and even the recently released Oppo running on a MediaTek dimension, 1000 plus I'm extremely curious. This is tech neck and without further ado. Let's find out, it's probably a good idea to make sure that all phones are topped off at 100 using their respective charges and, yes, they are all sitting at 100. The Xiaomi does say that there is a battery issue, but that's just because it wants us to enable automatic brightness, but we're not going to do that.

Since I manually set all the brightness levels using a lux luminous meter at the start of the test, just to make sure that things are as even as possible, we're going to be using an emissivity level of 0.50 on my infrared heat gun here to test out temps during every interval period, they're all charging at the current point in time. So you can't really compare them right now in terms of battery drain temperature. But this is just the charging and I guess the 11 is rightfully the hottest here with the motor edges being the coolest, but we'll get to a charging test. Another time as of right now this is a battery drain test. We have that time interval at the top right-hand corner.

We have the current app at the bottom right-hand corner, and we have specifications on all devices here at the bottom, underneath each device after that first 30 minute interval in relation to the percentage above each phone below the branding of the phone. Furthermore, we have 95 on the edge s 94 on the Samsung 96 on the Xiaomi 97 on the Oppo 94 on the VIVO and 95 on the IQ with the Oppo leading the pack here, even though it has a very small battery at just 4 350 Williams, compared to the two batteries on the left hand, side which are both 5 000 William hour cells, the Xiaomi mi 11 didn't do too well with its HD test at 60hz or full HD at 60hz. So it's going to be fascinating to see what the m11 can do here with 120 hertz and full HD. After one hour, we have 92 percent on the HS 90 on the Samsung 92 matching. The edges are the Xiaomi, with a significantly smaller battery 93 now falling behind is the Oppo Reno 5 pro, though still leading the pack here, 90 on the VIVO 91 on the iq7, which actually has a slightly bigger battery than its brother, the x60 pro reaching that one hour and 30 minute mark after Xiaomi was clearly the hottest over there in the last interval, as well as its peak temperature.

We have 87 on the edges 84 on the Samsung 85 percent on the mi 11. Now the Samsung is below the me11 and the edge s is at the top of the pack, even ahead of the Oppo arena, 5 pro, and we have 83 on the VIVO and 83 on the IQ. We're currently watching some live TV on Facebook about a head over to that two hour. Mark interval Xiaomi still the hottest device here and the Motorola is still the coolest 82 percent after two hours on the Motorola HS 81 on the s21 ultra neck and neck between those two now the opening 5 pro still impressing me here, leading the pack with the edges at the same 82 percent 79 on the mean 11 79 on the VIVO x60, a pro plus and 79 on the IQ 7. We're now currently with twitter.

Doing a looping video here getting to that to our and a 30-minute mark interval. Let's see which one is going to take the lead after there's 77 on the edges, still with an edge over the x21 ultra here with an extra one percent. There 76 on the opp, now matching the Samsung but trailing the Motorola 75 behind that is the VIVO x60 pro plus slightly falling behind now. Matching Nisha is the iq7 with 74 and, of course, 74 on the me11, we're currently busy with Instagram doing some search videos over here and just to give you guys some knowledge. The Xiaomi mi 11 was ridiculously hot.

My last two battery tests of it were waiting for the efficient mini 12.5, which is unfortunately only coming in the third quarter of the year. So we're going to have to wait for that one. I think it's going to make a drastic improvement to the mi 11 as of right. Now, I'm not quite sure this device is worth it's running old software. Yes, we are on android 11, but we're using old mini software, which means that it's not optimized for the nice beefy snapdragon 888 chipsets, which is run on five nanometer tech and is supposedly a lot more efficient than the seven nanometer process.

Node technology chipsets, which is found within the edge s running the snapdragon 870 and the opening 5 pro here, with the demand city, 1000 plus also on seven nanometer process, no technology. So it is going to be interesting to see how these seven nanometer chips compete with the five nanometer chips here, and we're heading on to that four hour. Mark interval with the Xiaomi still being the hottest the haiku was actually the coolest. The last interval and the coolest peak has been the edge s, the edge s after four hours and one minute, 65 percent. Here now the s21 ultra is leading the pack with 67.

The Xperia has fallen quite a bit behind with 63, but matching that is the VIVO x60 pro plus 62 on the iq7 and 58 still trailing the pack, the mi 11, even though it doesn't have the smallest battery here, there's certainly some issues with the Xiaomi mi 11, and I have to say it must, it has to be the software at the current moment if these issues are still there when mini 12.5 is released, then there's definitely something wrong with the hardware of this phone we're currently busy with camera here we're recording, 4k 30fps video. Before this we did selfie 1080p 30fps video. Now many of these phones can actually record higher than that, but I keep it at this so that we can compare it with other smartphones that have been drained on my channel. Remember you cannot compare these smartphones or any drain tests on my channel with other channels. Since we use different brightnesses, some people use the volume up.

I keep the volume muted, some people use sim cards. I use Wi-Fi and, of course, like I said, different brightness and apps as well. So don't compare this with any other channel, but you can compare this to all the other phones that have been drained on my channel so make sure to head over to my channel after this and check out a couple. Phones fascinating. How long phones can actually last I'm talking about you, Mr ASUS ROG phone 3.

Temperature too high on both VIVO devices. Here, not long after that the mi 11 running 3dmark wildlife had the same issue in my last drain. Test really throttling this time around overheating, killing the app as well on the Xiaomi after five and a half hours now 33 on the edge s, which is just one percent behind the s21 ultra, we have 21 on the mini 11, still trailing the pack here, 27 on the Oppo beating the two VIVO devices. Well, actually, the one VIVO x60 pro plus 28 on the iq7 is now beating the opp, and we have overheating again running GF expense on the 11, and we had a low battery message twice now on the iq7 and the battery's too low on the m11. It just calls it a day here.

Five hours and 57 minutes you be the judge. If that is decent battery life. I usually say anything over six hours of battery life is decent, but this didn't quite make it there, and I would say it's good battery life for a four thousand William hour cell battery, but this is rocking a 4 600 William hour battery, the biggest that we've seen on an actual flagship from Xiaomi before, and it's not doing a good job once again that mini 12 software needs to be upgraded to 12.5, asap, 12.89 William hour per minute. Reading rates of battery drain is really not good guys reaching that six and a half hour mark all of them are still alive here that we have two percent left on both VIVO devices. Seven percent right in front of that is the Reno five pro ahead of that is the edges with fifteen percent, which is just two percent behind the Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra, which VIVO is gonna, die.

First, it is the iq7, of course it does have 200 William hours smaller battery compared to its brother, the x60 pro plus, which does in turn cost quite a lot more money. The cheapest phone on the table here is the Motorola edge s, which is around 250 euros, starting here in China, which is ridiculously cheap, but the x60 pro plus more expensive than the iq7 finished four minutes later than it. I guess not really a big difference there with the 200 Williams between these two devices and the iq7 has a larger screen as well seven hours we have 10 left on the edge 11 percent left on the s21 ultra and 1 left on the arena. He doesn't want to give up here after seven hours, I'm proud of him. He made it to the seven-hour mark and then just gave up at the seven hour and six mark and that's not too bad seven hours and six minutes is brilliant for a phone with a tiny 4 350 William battery, especially when you compare it to the likes of the mi 11 with a 4 600 William hour battery, and it got an extra hour even more than an hour of use of battery life out of the opp, and it's an even slimmer device.

I really like the Oppo RINO 5 pro. Of course, it's not running the best chipset around, but it's a great device. Nonetheless, two percent left on the edges: five percent left on the s21 ultra after seven and a half hours. This is pretty good battery life. I mean there are both rocking, really high refresh rate panels.90 hertz on the edges says, cheers to us now after seven hours and 37 minutes, which is perfect battery life, but it does have a much larger battery than the Oppo Reno 5 pro. So it didn't quite match that William hour per minute reading and the s21 ultra not far behind that with seven hours and 42 minutes, just five minutes longer lasting than the edge s, and they have the same battery capacity.

But the Samsung does have a larger screen than the AJS. It does use an AMOLED screen, which is a lot more efficient than the IPS lcd that you see on the edges. The rest of the devices here also all using AMOLED, except for the Motorola sixth place here. The Xiaomi mi 11 5 hours and 57 minutes rocking a 120 hertz AMOLED display does have the largest display here at 6.81 inches. So I'm not too surprised didn't do the best in my previous battery drain test at 60 hertz, the iq7 in fit play 6 hours and 34 minutes an extra 30, 40 minutes of juice compared to the Xiaomi slightly cheaper device here, but a much smaller screen.

The VIVO x60 pro plus much more expensive than the previous two devices six hours and 38 minutes. It does have quite a powerful camera, though its battery is just subpar. The Oppo Reno 5 pro fantastic battery life for just a 4 350 William hour cell 7 hours and 6 minutes second place. We have the 5 000 William hour, champ, the Motorola HS rocking 90 hertz, and an LCD panel and a less efficient, seven nanometer chipset seven hours and 37 minutes is still superb and in first place we have the s21 ultra with another massive battery matching the Motorola of 5 000 William hours, 7 hours and 42 minutes is great, though it couldn't reach that 9 hour mark that we saw when running at 60 hertz now, comparing them all to the other smartphones on my channel, which I've tested out, which you can compare, because I use the same apps the same brightness levels. We have the Huawei Mate 40 pro right at the top, with over nine hours and then drop quite a bit.11Th place is the s21 ultra, it's predecessor, the s20 ultra. Did it in nine minutes shorter time than the s21 ultra, even though it didn't have as of an efficient chipset.

The Motorola edge is splitting those two buddies apart there right below. That is the Oppo Reno 5, and then we have the VIVO x60 pro hovering around the bottom, with the iq7 and slap bang at the bottom. The Xiaomi mi 11. , now the hottest device at the end of the test, was the 11 when it clocked out 66.5 degrees in Celsius, but the Motorola edges hit the hottest peak at 67.7 degrees in Celsius. Both of these phones got ridiculously hot.

The biggest difference between them, though, is that the Xiaomi closed its app trying to prevent damage to the battery when it got too hot, where the Motorola edges just powered through which I have to give to it. You know thumbs up for that one brother, but you can really damage your battery. If you keep it running at such a hot temp, the coolest phone here was the s21 ultra. The best a million power permanent reading we had was on the iq7 with 10.15 and the worst on the Xiaomi with 12.89. The haiku didn't win the battle over here, but it definitely got the best milliampere per minute reading, since it has a thousand William hours less battery capacity compared to the Samsung, and it finished just an hour before that, meaning that if they all had the same size battery for 5000 Williams, the IQ would place first with 8 hours and 13 minutes then second would be.

The Oppo third would be. The Vito. Fourth would now be the Samsung fifth. The Motorola and sixth would remain the Xiaomi mi 11, due to its terrible 12.89 William per minute reading. I hope that you guys have found this test interesting.

I definitely enjoyed making it. The subs of the channel would be absolutely incredible. This is tech. Nick and I'll see you in the next one. You.

Source : TechNick