Honor 20 Pro vs Pixel 3a Camera Comparison By Daniel Sin

Today we're going to put two budget phones to pixel through an honest wait foot for a and the honor 20 the truck pixels read those have a collection for lenses. So let's see how they compare. So this is the low light front-facing test, and I'm walking in the city at night. Of course, there is a building right next to me and some streetlights above me: no cars, sadly, but yeah. Let's move on to the next section, so with portrait multi both can do it, but the honor 20 pro is more flexible. You got 1x 2x and 3x on a pixel 3.

You can naturally zoom in a bit and rely on a software to recognize what object to cut out on the pixel 3. It's pretty zoomed in. If you want to take a picture of something in your hands, then you would have to reach out a bit now. I know in portrait mode. It has some trouble with reflective surfaces.

So usually that would happen. That's why the honor 20 Pro looks a bit too wonky, but the performance is really similar. You just point shoot on a Google phone. You would have to rely more on software to recognize why it is to cut out, so I would say that it's a bit easier and the background blur is much denser on a 20. Pro is really nice to have the telephoto lens to go up to 3x, but I realized that the focus is pretty slow.

So sometimes you might miss focus or the images ends up being blurry, or you might have to take your picture again, but at the end of the day the pixel 3, a for me is gonna, be the easy one to use for everyday situations. It's obvious that the honor 20 Pro is gonna, be the better one. You got the flexibility to go ultra-wide, normal and zoom in and get much more clear pictures than zooming in on to pixel 3, a will give props to pixel because that software AI and does a perfect job cleaning up really zoomed in images for color lines. They're both pretty similar I would say that the honor 20 Pro has a bit more saturation going on, and the pixel 3 is more aggressive on the white balancing. So, since it's really trying to make things, look really white, the whole image may look a bit too blue.

So this is the pixel 3 it does have a mid-range strip, and so you take a picture and if you want to review it right away, you do have to wait a bit like a quick second for it to process. If it's portrait mode or night mode, it may take a little longer for HDR I'm gonna, give it to the pixel 3. The software does a good job, trying to even things out on the honor 20 Pro. You can tell that it's a bit darker in the shadows for low-light on, aren't 20 Pro I would stay away from the ultra-wide and the telephoto lenses. At this point, if you're zooming in with the pixel array I, think the pixels going to come out the winner here, because the software does help sharpen things up.

So it's not gonna, look as blurry or noisy as the honor 20 Pro. Now, that's not gonna, be the case all the time with the Pixar 3d, because sometimes in the darkest shadows, you can tell that a lot of noise is coming out of it. From my experience, taking pictures on the pixel tend to be sharp or a captured sharper moment, because sometimes my hand would move, or the person would move suddenly. So it would end up being a really blurry result, and it does happen to all of us and out of all the phones I've used. The pixel line gave me the best result in those certain moments.

Now the both our night modes and I realize that the pixel does give out the brighter image. Now I may look too fake or too forced to some people, but if you're taking a picture in dark places, I think the main priority of the picture is getting a bright one to be seeable so, and it's really personal preference, but usually I, don't think a lot of people would be in dark situations. A lot anyways, so using night mode is pretty situational for video. They both can shoot up to 4k 30 and, of course, you can use the ultra-wide angle lens on 120 Pro. That is a good thing, but the stabilization on that is not doing too well moving on to the main camera.

They both have their own quirks. The stabilization on the Pixel 3a tend to be too jerky, so it's trying to it seems like it's trying to catch up to where I'm trying to turn or a pan, but on honor 20 Pro. You can see that there's a lot more micro traders as I'm walking and for HDR and colors I'm gonna, give it to the pixel, because, on the colors on the honor, 20 Pro looks a bit muddy and greyed out, and the video is brighter on the pixel 3. Moving on to low-light completely avoid ultra-wide angle lines, it's really blurry noisy, and it just doesn't capture a lot of light now. Moving on to the main camera.

They both do not do too well in the light so either way it's not going to be good. They both have a lot of micro jitters as I'm walking, but a difference here is that the honor 20 Pro is more aggressive with the white balancing sort of tungsten arms and lights that we see tend to look more white on Donner, so if the pixel actually shows to be more realistic or closer to the eye, so in the end the honor 20 Pro has a lot more flexibility, and it gives you more choices in the camera modes, but it picks up the rate. It's very easy to use so for average consumers, it's probably better off for them, because you can just snap in looks good, and since the software does all the work, the images tend to look closer to the flagship models. So that is my comparison between these two phones. If you guys aren't interested I do have two links down below.

Please follow me on Instagram. If I like to subscribe, hit the bell, and thanks for watching.

Source : Daniel Sin