Google Pixel 4 vs iPhone 11 Pro Speed Test & Camera Comparison! By EverythingApplePro E A P

Hey, what's up guys everything Apple Pro here today, let's take a look at Google's new phone. The Google Pixel for I want to go ahead and see how much faster or slower it is versus Apple's, iPhone, 11, Pro and then get some camera samples in there, because this phone is legendary for a whole. That legacy of them is for the nighttime shots and very curious before we jump into that. Just want to show you a couple of things about it. First off the motion sensor, and basically you can approach it. Wake up for you, and here we've got the motion sensing for music, so you can use a gesture with the radar sensor and swap songs.

I found that it works 9 out of 10 times the further away you get. Obviously it's not gonna work, so you got to be fairly close in their live. Transcribed works fairly, well, prepared, Godzilla, meow, salute sure, yeah, both professional, translated it fairly well, and the Google Pixel for looking a little dated with the snapdragon 855, a full generation behind Apple's, a 13 doesn't even have the snapdragon 855 plus. That would require additional cooling. The advantage it holds is two additional gigabytes of RAM, so we'll see how that reflects in round two, where we have to keep more applications open.

Now this is running a day-to-day real-world speed test, a bunch of applications you might find throughout your day and seeing which one finishes or complete the test. First now one thing I noticed about the iPhone this time around, since my last iPhone 11 Pro versus 10s, vs.10 speed test is that the applications seem more optimized. Things are smoother running better, and the iPhone has had a few software updates. Since so, it's on iOS 13 point one point: three now, and things are looking really, really good and there are two things I'd like to note about the pixel. So for one the display in a bright environment outdoors or under these bright lights, it's not as bright, doesn't look as good in max brightness versus the iPhone, and as we know, the 11pro does have the world's best display named by display mate, so they could have done better there, although the 90 Hertz I'd say, makes up for that.

That's a trade-off. I take any day to have that on the iPhone -. Why does it have an old processor? The Snapdragon 855 is not the newest, and the most current I know that the 55 + draws more power, and these don't have the largest batteries, but even with the 90 Hertz display on after running the battery performed fairly well, and it was back to the test, so the iPhone is leaps and bounds ahead of the Google Pixel for already finishing up the test with our 4k video editing portion. At this point, the iPhone is already finishing up the 4k video export all while the Google Pixel is still several applications behind the Apple II 13 is truly a marvel of modern engineering, finished up with a round one time of two minutes and eight seconds, and just now the Google pixels getting to the 4k video export. Although this is one area where the Google Pixel did surprise me, it had a ridiculously fast export time, better than any other smartphone.

That I've seen with this clip so props to them on that handled the export very well, but it finished with around one time of 2 minutes and 53 seconds. So here's the big difference between the two while the Google Pixel has an additional 2 gigabytes of RAM. It had absolutely zero, not one application pre-loaded. In the background, it literally dumped every single one to finish that 4k video export, and that may be the secret to why it's so fast, but I had to run through every single one. Not even the last application was preloaded.

It's ridiculous! So there's some sort of optimization going on where it dumps every app in the background and that's quite unusual to see with a smartphone with more RAM, and this is where it became quite clear to me that the iPhone has had some optimizations since it first launched, as in my first speed test on an earlier version of Iowa's 13, almost none of the applications were open, but everything since Minecraft was, in this version of the test props to Apple for doing that. Maybe we'll see something of the sort of the pixel as it is still a brand-new device, but I'm very disappointed. Its RAM management was wack and completely ineffective compared to the iPhone, with its inferior 4 gigabytes. You never know when you'll need your phone in a pinch after it dies and there's a serial killer chasing you. This is the ultimate test of that in 3, 2, 1 and attempting to start them up.

At the same time, here Android 10 on the left, Iowa's 13-point 1.3 on the right, and this one does not have any carrier labels, no screens like that Wow just like that, starts up way faster than iOS, so I'm liking this Android stripped down as such unique experience so much better than anything while your Samsung offer and there it is on the iPhone. So a little slower there, and I just want to give a shout-out to Google the amount of refinements the pixel has gone through software. Wise I really feel it like using the mate 30. Even the note 10, it does not offer this level of refinement. I love the gestures.

Everything is snappy. Everything feels great, and I want to test the individual app speed here on a couple applications. So generally, though, both were pretty quick, Snapchat one, two, a little faster there on the pixel Instagram one two just smudge faster on the pixel camera app one two and this one is ready to take pictures sooner I phone, not far behind Photoshop and the iPhone loaded, this one faster and rendering the same image here, 10k and the iPhone loads that one faster so for general app launching some smaller stuff. It looks like the pixel loads, those sooner heavier stuff, the iPhone and let's take a look at the Geek bench scores. So this is using Geek bench 5 and the new calculations.

Oh wow, that's actually kind of sad. Why is this so low? So that's the snapdragon 855 the nonplus variants unusually low score, even for that processor and 6 gigabytes of ram, so we've got double more than double in a single core and that impressive Apple, 13 gives us a 3366 on the mole time. So next up its getting an to benchmark going and just for fun, seeing how hot these devices get the iPhone 11 Pro reaches a scalding 107 degrees on its hottest point actually 107 point four. So about the same there, the an tutu results, snapdragon 855, already a little long in the tooth. It is time for the 865 next up, let's test Google's face on lock versus face ID and I want to test something funny out, so this will unlock with your eyes closed and yeah.

It does so if you're sleeping your girlfriend is curious, wants to get in there. She could do that if you're dead at your funeral, they can lift it up to your face, and it will unlock okay. Let's test speed wise here, so one two, three, oh wow, so they are quite a difference. There animation, wise apples got a way longer drawn-out and Mahan. One two three both are quick.

Apples, of course, is more secure and one more thing I'd like to commend Google on with the pixel for, is adapting a 90 Hertz display its smoother. You know it's everything I've ever wanted out of an iPhone display, and supposedly we're getting it in 2020 with a 120 Hertz display, potentially on the iPhone, but it's so great I mean everything is so smooth launching your applications. It's just a pleasure to use this phone and going back to the iPhone there's a very noticeable difference. Now. What I'm most interested about with the Google Pixel is, of course, the nighttime capabilities.

The pixel line is notorious for it being able to take good pictures with night sight. So, let's see one two three: it is a separate mode, not automatic like on the iPhone 11 probe. So if you don't go into that mode, you will not get the same great picture. Wow. Definitely the iPhone in terms of colors, like down on the rocks more natural-looking to what I'm actually seeing here in real life.

That is incredible. Okay, this is a nighttime video, the ultra-wide lens, and fortunately so do that. But the iPhones isn't even that great at nighttimes very noisy and with wind, I guess we'll see on the computer. These are the undisputed kings of nighttime photography. The Google Pixel has long been known for its nitrite feature and the iPhone 11 Pro with its night mode, really caught up and even surpassed the Google Pixel in some areas.

Now, depending on the lighting and the situation where the lighting is coming from, the skin tones would sometimes look better on the pixel, sometimes on the eleven. The probe, but both looked fantastic I noticed that the Google Pixel was a lot cooler. It didn't always reflect the actual colors of what I was seeing. Some objects would be displayed differently, but you know you really can't go wrong with either one it's such a small difference between the two and some daytime footage 4k with this beautiful autumn foliage. So there's one concern I had with the pixel notice this when I shift to a more green environment notice how cold the picture gets then going to Orange everything, lightens up, vivid, more bright, and then it's cold I.

Don't understand why it does that transition, but it's definitely noticeable. Look at the green leaves how blue they get as soon as I pan downwards. So there's some sort of color correction issue: I have faith that Google will fix that otherwise, in 4k, both look fantastic. You know in daytime most modern smartphones are going to look good. The true test here was in the dark and both did really well personally.

I, like the iPhone colors a bit more realistic, but in the daytime both look great, of course, Google's. Legendary support with the app looks fantastic, very easy to use. Somehow, though Apple one up them in the ease of use of how the night mode works, but no complaints to either one it's up to you. Let me know which one you think looks better in the comments: I'm leaning towards the iPhone, because it doesn't have that weird color issue, where it makes everything a lot bluer and colder than it looks to be in real life right now. Also, this is testing the two x telephoto zoom lens, which the fix will just receive so stabilization, while moving and both do fairly well, here, pixels working and overdrive kind of jumping between corner to corner awhile stationary.

Let's do some panning yeah, both look great. Of course. Everyone was wishing that they would have received an ultra-wide lens and that's just one area where the pixel cannot compete. It is a wonderful feature and wonderful addition to the iPhone camera. That concludes my comparison thanks for watching.

Hopefully this helped you determine which device you'd rather go for peace.

Source : EverythingApplePro E A P