Samsung Galaxy A51 Review After 2 months! By GadgetByte

By GadgetByte
Aug 15, 2021
0 Comments
Samsung Galaxy A51 Review After 2 months!

If, you remember last year's Galaxy. If 50 was one of the highest selling mid-range phones of 2019, the company had already updated it with the Galaxy S 50s, but disappointingly it came with very few and insignificant upgrades, and now we have another phone in the galaxy 50 lineups the galaxy a 51. This time around, though there have been quite a few interesting improvements. However, the competition has gotten even fiercer in 2020, coming from brands like Coke or red me and Rio me. Now, we've already covered a lot about this device on our hands-on review of it, but now that I've used it for a long time, a very long time. Actually this is our detailed review of the galaxy 51.

Let's start with the design compared to the 50 I found quite a few improvements here. First, the 3d holographic cut patterns, look amazing and in terms of color choices, I have the white one and the blue variant with me and both looked very suiting. The cameras at the back also have a new look similar to that of Samsung Galaxy s, 20 series: you still get a plastic back and freeman here, but what I really like about this phone is how light it is I've recently reviewed the Poco x2 and the Rio Mystics pro and well. Both of them feel very heavy and boxy, whereas the galaxy 51 is really thin, light and comfortable to use so overall I like the phone for its design and build, if not for its plastic bag and frames. Moving on to the display, you know that I'm going to appreciate it thanks to Samsung's signature, Super AMOLED panel and the centered punch hole cut out, makes the galaxy fifty-one's display aesthetically pleasing talking about the panel itself.

It's a big 6.5 inches display with quite cinematic 20 years to nine aspect ratios and yes, the display quality is excellent, as we've come to expect from Samson here the colors are great, and so is the contrast ratio. Additionally, if the phone gets a decent amount of brightness as well, with almost no compromise on visible LETI, even when you're outdoors in a valid environment, adding to that the tux response on the galaxy 51 is fantastic, although it is still a regular 60 Hertz panel navigating through the phone is quite Swift just for comparison, I tried it out against the Realme x2, which has an AMOLED panel as well. However, the superiority of the 51 was quite apparent upon a rather quick inspection. One more thing: there is the stated Corning Gorilla, Glass 3 protection on the phone, and I'm not going to lie. I do have a few minor scratches on the screen.

So if anybody from Samsung is watching this one quick suggestion, maybe you could include an inbuilt screen protector. Just like you do on your expensive flagship models. Honestly, that is going to help a lot. Now, let's talk cameras and like the display, this one is equally amazing. Apart from the camera arrangement, I talked about earlier, you get a quad camera set up in here.

There's the 48 megapixel primary camera, a 12 megapixel ultra wide-angle lens, a 5 megapixel depth sensor and the final one is a 5 megapixel macro sensor. Now talking about the primary camera, as we usually see on Samsung phones, the 50 ones, 12 megapixel pixel bin shots have an incredible amount of detail with decent atomic range and punchy colors in the process of testing the cameras I also compared it against the Poco x2, which is because it comes in the same price range as the galaxy 51, but more precisely a typical paraffin, because the Coco x2 comes with the latest Sony I make 686 m sir anyways compared to the Poco x2 I was quite surprised to see how the galaxy 851 held its port. Just look at these images. The a51 produces quite eye-catching colors, especially the sky. In comparison, getting to the nighttime images.

The Poco x2 images are better, be it in a normal nighttime shot or from the dedicated night mode. Despite that, in other different scenarios, I had a very hard time, distinguishing which one's better but what's definitely distinguishable are the images from the ultra wide-angle s. Here the e51 takes the crown, as it's got, the best of everything from risk to detail to dynamic range to colors. Talking about macro shots like I've, been saying in many of our phone reviews, it's just a gimmick and is very less practical in the case of the 51 as well. It's not very useful, though you can get some acceptable images with good lighting.

Similarly, the regular and portrait selfie images are also better on the galaxy 51, with better colors details and sharper focus compared to the poor 4x2 getting to the videos, though it supports 4k recording it is limited to 30 fps and lacks stabilization. On the contrary, you still get quite stable videos in 1080p videos similar to the photos. The videos have quite good colors and dynamic range and, as expected on a Samsung phone, you also get the super, steady mode, slo-mo and super slo-mo video modes. Talking about the software version, the galaxy 51 runs on android 10, with 1 UI 2.0 on top and the difference between the original 1 UI 1.0 -. This version of 1 UI is great.

Although there are not many visual differences, I did notice that this one is a lot smoother. Having said that, there is still a slight hint of lag while navigating through the apps and multitasking comparatively it's just not as Swift as see the one on the Poco x2 or the Realme x2, and that's definitely because of the same old Enos 96.1, that's powering it, which, by the way, is just a slight improvement over Enos nine six one zero on the original Galaxy at 50. What's even more unacceptable is how Samsung's new Galaxy M 21 with its much less going price shares the same chipset to the galaxy 51. We have been consistently complaining about the company's chipset selection in there a series of lineup. At this point, I am exhausted of it, I mean how inconsiderate can one get the Galaxy II 71 we reviewed a couple of weeks back.

Has the Snapdragon 730 and its performance is, let's say good? Well, if you think about it, the Galaxy, a 51 should be the one forward by the Snapdragon 730 and the galaxy 70 one should have been powered by something even more powerful. Well, keeping that aside, when it comes to gaming, the performance is similar to that of last year's Galaxy. A 50 graphic intensive games like pop G, run at an acceptable for the FPS mark in smooth graphics and ultra frame rates, while Call of Duty is playable on high graphics and high refresh rates. But as you push the Settings higher, you get a ton of stutters and lags to the state of not being able to enjoy the gameplay. Also, the food got a little warm near the camera module while gaming for a little while, therefore, with its under powering SOC, the galaxy, a 51 is definitely not for those gaming centric audience in terms of memory.

There is either 4 6 or 8 GB of RAM and 64 or 128 GB of storage. The one I have has is 6 128 GB configuration with a dedicated micros card slot for storage expansion. As for the industry fingerprint sensor, it is much faster and accurate than its predecessor and with the recent update, it is gotten even better, but despite this, it is nowhere near comparable to what the competitors are offering with their faster sensor, but at the end of the day it gets the job done, and you'll get used to it pretty soon. Likewise, the software based face unlock is ok too, but still isn't the fastest. Now moving to the battery, there isn't any upgrade from its predecessors.

The four thousand William hour battery impact yields similar endurance as the galaxy 50 and a 50 s and gives a solid one-day battery life. In my time with the phone it gave me around 6 hours of screen on time, which consisted of 2 hours of binging YouTube about an hour of gaming and over an hour social media usage, though the Internet itself is amazing. The charging well not so much. You are still stuck with the 15 watt fast charging, which now can be seen on the budget Samsung phones, so it would have been much nicer if Samsung had included a 25 watt charging technology. Like the Samsung Galaxy 71 with the 15 watt charger, it takes about one hour and 15 minutes for the Galaxy 51 to get charged from zero to a hundred percent.

The audio quality on this phone is okay h2. It has a more speaker that gets the job done, but I think Samsung should include a stereo setup, at least in their upper series devices, to make it more value, packed and distinguish it from their cheaper M series. Similarly, there is no problem that I faced with the 3.5 mm, headphone jack and even in terms of quality. The audio is loud and clear. In conclusion, I got in a dilemma as to how I should give a verdict on the galaxy 51, while reviewing it I kept on asking myself, who is this phone for, and I think it is a perfect phone for a casual smartphone user who does not emphasize a lot on gaming and performance.

Someone like my sister, who does not play high in games and just wants a stylish phone with a great display and great cameras, because she benches a lot of Amazon Prime content on her phone. However, if you are someone with a higher performance standard, then this phone is not the optimal choice for you. I think you should rather go with the Coco x2 or the Rio me x2 instead, and one more thing to consider is that Samsung is known for dropping the price of its easily smartphones from time to time. So right now, this phone cost, like thirty-eight thousand here in Nepal, but in about a month or two. This phone should get a price drop of like five thousand rupees, and that would be an even better time to buy this phone, so that was our detailed review of the Samsung Galaxy 51.

If you liked the review make sure to subscribe to our Channel and hit that Bell icon so that you get notified each time, we upload an awesome new video till then I'm Troy, Tear, Ducati, stay indoors and stay safe.


Source : GadgetByte

Phones In This Article



Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu