Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 By DEVICE BATTLES

DEVICE BATTLES PRESENTS Samsung Galaxy A32 versus...... versus Samsung Galaxy A52 BODY Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 COLORS 4 Colors: Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet vs 4 Colors: Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue DIMENSIONS 158.9 mm, 73.6 mm, 8.4 mm vs 159.9 mm, 75.1 mm, 8.4 mm WEIGHT 184 grams vs 189 grams BODY MATERIALS Plastic back, Plastic frame vs Plastic back, Aluminum frame WATER RESISTANT Not Declared vs IP67 Up to 1m / 30 mins DISPLAY Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 DISPLAY TYPE Super AMOLED 800 nits Peak Brightness vs Super AMOLED 800 nits Peak Brightness DISPLAY SIZE 6.4 inches vs 6.5 inches DISPLAY RESOLUTION 1080 x 2400 pixels vs 1080 x 2400 pixels DISPLAY ASPECT RATIO 20:9 vs 20:9 DISPLAY PIXEL DENSITY 411 ppi vs 407 ppi DISPLAY TO BODY RATIO 84.6% vs 84.1% DISPLAY REFRESH RATE 90 Hz vs 90Hz DISPLAY PROTECTION Gorilla Glass 5 vs Gorilla Glass 5 CAMERA Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 MAIN CAMERA 64 MP, f/1.8 Samsung GW3 vs 64 MP, f/1.8 Sony IMX682 Optical Stabil. ULTRA WIDE CAMERA 8 MP, f/2.2 vs 12 MP, f/2.2 MACRO CAMERA 5 MP, f/2.4 vs 5 MP, f/2.4 DEPTH SENSOR 5 MP, f/2.4 vs 5 MP, f/2.4 FLASH LED Flash vs LED Flash VIDEO MAX RESOLUTION FHD@30fps Stabilisation: GYRO-EIS vs 4K@30fps Stabilisation: GYRO-EIS SLOW MOTION VIDEO 720p@120fps 1080p@60fps vs 720p@240fps 1080p@120fps SELFIE CAMERA Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 SELFIE CAMERA RESOLUTION 20 MP, f/2.2 vs 32 MP, f/2.2 SELFIE VIDEO MAX RESOLUTION FHD 1080p@30fps vs 4K 2160p@30fps HARDWARE Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 CHIPSET MTK Helio G80 (12 nm) vs Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) CPU 2x2.0 GHz 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.3 GHz 6x1.8 GHz GPU Mali G52 MC2 vs Adreno 618 RAM 4GB LPDDR4 vs 4/8GB LPDDR4 INTERNAL STORAGE 64GB 128GB UFS 2.1 vs 128GB 256GB UFS 2.1 EXTERNAL STORAGE Up to 1024 GB Dedicated Slot vs Up to 1024 GB Shared SIM Slot FINGERPRINT ON SCREEN Optical vs ON SCREEN Optical OPERATING SYSTEM Android 11, One UI 3.1 vs Android 11, One UI 3.1 BATTERY Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 BATTERY CAPACITY 5 000 mAh Type: Li-Ion Non-removable vs 4 500 mAh Type: Li-Po Non-removable FAST CHARGING 15W 100% in 139 min vs 25W 100% in 90 min WEB BROWSING up to 16:10 h vs Up to 14:40 hours VIDEO PLAYBACK up to 17:50 h vs Up to 14:00 hours OTHER FEATURES Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 MULTIMEDIA Speakers, Jack 3.5 mm, FM Radio, Infrared Port, USB CONNECTIVITY Network, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, NFC SIM & SENSORS SIM Type, Dual SIM, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Proximity, Barometer... TESTS Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 SAR 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) vs 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) LOUDSPEAKER -30.3 LUFS (Below average) vs -27.0 LUFS (Good) ANTUTU BENCHMARK RESULTS 196 520 (v8) vs 261 280 (v8) GEEKBENCH RESULTS 1 277 (v5.1) vs 1 577 (v5.1) GFXBENCH RESULTS 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) vs 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) PRICE Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A52 LOWEST PRICE $290 128GB 4GB vs $350 128GB 4GB RESULT Strengths of Each Phone Samsung Galaxy A32: Price, Battery. Samsung Galaxy A52: Camera, Selfie Camera, Hardware, Stereo Speakers, Water Resistant, Fast Charging. Have anything to add? Which one do you like more? Please, drop a comment.

Like, Subscribe, Bell, Share!.

Source : DEVICE BATTLES