Redmi Note 10 Pro VS Samsung Galaxy A52 Detailed Camera Comparison. The result is shocking. By FRED'S TECH HUB

Hey guys face tech up here, so in this video I'll be comparing the cameras on two of the best mid-range smartphone that money can buy. Today, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 pro and the Samsung Galaxy f52 as it currently stands. I personally consider these two to be the best mid-range smartphone that is very affordable, yet offers a lot. The Redmi Note 10 pro packs a whopping 108 megapixels camera, an 8 megapixel, auto wide camera, a 5 megapixel macro lens and a 2 megapixel step sensor. The selfie camera on the Redmi Note 10 pro is a 16 megapixel camera on the f52. We've got a large 64 megapixel main sensor, 12 megapixels or two white camerae, a 5 megapixel macro lens and a 5 megapixel step sensor, and on the selfie side, we've got a 32 megapixel camera.

Both smartphone offers impressive specs on paper, especially the Redmi Note 10 pro. But how does these two stack up against each other if you're looking for the best of the best among these two, which should you buy? Okay, let's find out as usual I'll? Let you guys go through the images first and satisfy your curiosity. Then I'll tell you what I think about each image, one after the other, all right, so switching to the rear camera both can shoot in 4k resolution 30 frames per second and there's no video stabilization when you're shooting in 4k on both devices, I think boat looks okay. However, dynamic range seems to be a little better on Redmi phone. But what do you guys think? Let me know in the comment section below I'm going to switch to 1080p mode on both phones, where they actually have video stabilization on, let's see which looks better all right guys.

So this is a 1080p footage from both phones, and they have video stabilization turn on board. So let's go ahead and run a little, let's see which is better, okay, guys. So now that you're done. Let me tell you what I think about both on the first image here. The a52 image is much brighter.

It exposes dark areas better, while the Redmi Note 10 pro images, appears a little darker. It is not too exposed as a Samsung image, but it is closer to real life than that of the a52. Moving on to the next one here both are well exposed, but the Samsung is slightly better, even though dynamic range is ever so slightly better. On the Redmi Note 10 pro images. Moving on this image has a small truck the foreground, the building and the water tank stand.

The Samsung continues to expose its images very well, while Xiaomi is still on the darker side. If you look closely under the truck at least, you can see some details on the a52 image, while the Redmi image is underexposed, the colors that both phone represent on the truck doesn't look like what it is in real life, although the Redmi image is closer to what I might call real-life image. Another thing to note is that, despite their very high megapixels count, they all shoot a 16 megapixel image by default on a zooming image like this one. Here, details are almost the same on this other image here. Both images are impressive, even though I'm leaning towards Redmi image, because of how it handles dynamic range colors on the wall is slightly too saturated on the a52 image, but both are really impressive.

Moving on this has to do with skin tone the background and details. I'm really impressed with both images. The a52 image is really consistent when it comes to height handles exposure, while the Redmi is consistent on hide, handle skin tone image from the a52 is bright with good colors. The Redmi, on the other hand, isn't that bright, but skin colors and details is really impressive. Same thing is applicable here.

Both are perfect and dynamic range is very impressive. On both, however, dynamic range is a bit better on the Redmi than the Samsung Galaxy a52 image Samsung tends to add too much blue to the sky, while Xiaomi keeps it natural, as it appears when it comes to skin tone. Both are really impressive, but Redmi image has more details. Moving on to this other image here, boots are doing pretty well, but I'll lean towards the Redmi image. The Redmi image is closer to real life, while Samsung added saturation to make it really pop.

This type of image can be subjective. Some people might prefer the natural look of the Redmi, while some will, like the saturated colors of the Samsung image same thing is applicable here. The a52 image is well exposed with much saturated colors, which a lot of people might prefer, but Redmi image is cool with its natural looks, better dynamic range and balanced colors. If I am to choose one, I would definitely choose the Samsung image because it looks attractive, and it pops. However, the Redmi image is a better one.

This is an ultrawide image for both phones and I have to give it to the a52. The a52 image is bright well exposed and details are present. The ultrawide image on Redmi comes close a little, especially on how it handles dynamic range, but the fv2 image looks better overall. Next is a 10x zoom on both phones, and this is where you see the advantage of the 108 megapixel sensor on the Redmi. It is clear vivid in colors, and it packs more details than the a52 image, but the real question is: how many times will it be using this feature? Moving on to portrait images, both phones are great in this regard.

Each detection is good on both. I cannot say one is better than the other when it comes to separation between the subject and the background, but I feel like the Redmi image is slightly better when it comes to details and the fv2 is better when it comes to exposure other than that. This is a tie. Moving on to selfie images, both performs very well, but here the Redmi is doing the opposite of what Samsung was doing with the rear photos. The a52 image is a lot brighter and has more details than that of the Redmi.

Dynamic range is also better on the Samsung image on the Redmi image. Contrast and saturation is a little too much and dynamic range is completely off, but I somehow love how it handles colors selfie portrait is really okay on board. Redmi is consistent with itself colors, while the a52 has brighter and balanced colors edge. Detection is perfect on board, but the Samsung image takes the cake when it comes to shared details. I really appreciate what these two devices has to offer.

It is really, really impressive. Moving on to night mode, this is where the Samsung phone really flex its extra module. The a52 image is clear and obviously looks better, but the Redmi image has its own as well. I personally feel like the Redmi image could be better if it was able to let in more light. I still think the Redmi has a potential of getting better via a software update.

Furthermore, I love how the Redmi handles those light flares for a fact. If you manually, add brightness, it could look better or very close to the a52 image, as you can see here. If you look at those light flares, it is all over the place on the a52 image. While it is better controlled with the Redmi, the Redmi really needs a software update to fix some of these. So when it comes to night images, the a52 is a clear winner, hello guys.

So this is a video from the front facing camera on both phones, the Redmi Note 10 pro and the Samsung Galaxy a52, okay, so the Redmi Note 10 pro can only shoot in 1080p using the front camera, while the Samsung can go up to 4k at 30 frames per second so, which do you guys think looks better. Let me know in the comment section below I think dynamic range is a little better. On the Redmi Note 10 pro, however, the Samsung Galaxy f52 image appears a little sharper all right. Let me know what you think in the comment section below. Okay, as you can see, both devices did excellently well, and I cannot say one is way better than the other outrightly, but what I can say is that the Samsung Galaxy a52 offers a complete camera experience than Redmi Note.10 pro night modes is better with the a52. Video stabilization is better with the a52 and, above all, it can shoot 4k video with the front camera, which is something the Redmi can not do.

The Redmi offers good dynamic range and its images would please anyone as well. So, in conclusion, you can never go wrong with any of these devices; they are both excellent in their respective ways, so that is it guys, my full camera comparison with two of the best mid-range smartphone available. What do you guys think? Let me know in the comment section below thanks so much for watching, and I'll talk to you in the next one.

Source : FRED'S TECH HUB