Hi guys its ASP OIT, and this is the much-anticipated Paco f2 Pro I've been using it on and off for about 72 hours, and these are my first impressions. Firstly, let's see what happened in the quick unboxing and if you want to see more videos like this make sure you are subscribed to the channel, and you've got your notifications turned on so the Paco f2 Pro retail box is very similar to the original Paco f1, with the black and yellow coloring did the same joke on the Paco f1 video. It wasn't even funny, then inside we have the manuals, in a case, the phone and the charging cable and 30 watt fast charger more on battery later so, firstly, appearance-wise it looks and feels more premium than the Paco f1, with its all screen display an almost brushed gunmetal back with circular quad camera set up more on cameras in a minute and a flashing red power button. Oh, and there's a headphone jack there as well so elephant in the room. Yes, this is very, very similar to the red meat Que 30 Pro, which was released in China a couple of months ago, but there are a couple of differences which we'll get to now. The main huge selling point of the Paco F 2 Pro is the fact that you're getting that upgraded design, a multiple-camera setup and top tier flagship, specs, the likes of the Qualcomm Snapdragon, a six five six gigabytes of RAM and 128 gigabytes of storage, and you're, getting all of that for just under five hundred euros, using the link in the video description.
And if you don't like this, cyber gray, color I think it comes in three other colors as well. So this is the front-facing camera on the Paco f2 pro 1080p max at 30 frames. A second only, but it looks pretty good so far, keep an eye out for stabilization as I move around and also keep an eye out for the HDR quality as well. So are we getting nice details in the shadowy areas and also is the sky becoming overexposed so far looks pretty decent, so no 4k on the front camera. But we do on the rear, including 60 frames per second, and we even have a Que like the 1200 pound, Samsung Galaxy S 20 ultra.
This 8k is available in 24, fps and 30fps, something that the galaxy s 20 ultra, doesn't even have it's only available in 24 FPS on the Samsung device, pretty remarkable at this price point now. Yes, the exposure and stabilization isn't great, but the autofocus is pretty decent, and it's EK. If you want better stabilization drop to 4k, especially at 30fps, where it's really solid and the cheeky bonus movie frame mode like on the OnePlus 8 series. Is a nice touch now in terms of photography. There are some great points, but also things, of course, that could be improved.
Firstly, the setup we have a 64 megapixel primal ins with F 1.9 aperture, a 13 megapixel, ultra wide-angle lens with F 2.4, aperture and a 123 degree field of view, a 5 megapixel macro lens and a 2 megapixel depth sensor for your portrait, shots, etc. , and, to be fair, the capabilities on these types of shots has impressed me. The ability to catch moving targets with pretty minimal motion blur is really quite impressive. Yes, it's not pixel issue, but it's better again than some top-tier flagship phones for that style of portrait. Point-And-Shoot shot.
The HDR capabilities are ok without being groundbreaking, as seen here, where there's some good detail in the shadows, but bright clouds etc. can be a little overexposed at times. The sharpness and detail in standard shots is good, and if you want to, you can also use the 64 mega pixel mode. If you want that even greater detail and one thing that I do like this high megapixel mode doesn't seem to suffer from the same post-processing problems that the mean note 10 had and to some extent again the likes of the OnePlus 8 pro with those two named examples. I did notice that when you press to see that photo you've just taken in the gallery, there was a bit of a lag and a freeze to actually get there.
With this, it's fairly instantaneous again considering the great detail in the shop good. Now, unfortunately, there is no telephoto lens, which is a bit of a shame. That means that all zoom is being done, digitally and not optically and, as a result, quality will degrade straight away when you begin to zoom in on your focus point. So if you are a massive zoom fan, that may be a potential downside for you, but as stated, we do have a macro mode. Instead, so close-up shots, look great.
We have a 20 megapixel front camera housed in that pop-up with a flashy blue light, and let me know what you think of these smoking. Selfies, apologies for the model. The six point, six seven-inch full HD plus Super AMOLED display- is really nice for media consumption and gaming, and it contains an Indus plate, fingerprint scanner. The only place I feel the display really lacks is in brightness are only 500 nits. That doesn't mean it's dull.
You can still view it outside. It's just not Samsung Galaxy one plus eight pro sorts of level- and one more thing display wise to consider is the fact that we have a 60 Hertz refresh rate and not a 91 2144 Hertz that we are starting to see creep into the smartphone market so a year or two ago, 60 Hertz is all we know, but the top flagship phones are now starting to pump this high refresh rate. If you're used to highly refresh rates that may seem like a bit of a downgrade to you. If you're not, and you're only used to sixty Hertz well, then you won't notice any difference. It's running Android, ten with me UI eleven over the top, which is Xiaomi skin, but it's me UI for Paco, so it basically has a Paco launcher on it, which I actually prefer to the standard menu.
Why? Because it feels more like stock Android. This is, of course, one of the main differences from the Redmi k, 30 pro that runs off straight me, UI 11 and the other main difference between the Paco f2 Pro and the Reyna K 30 pro is network provider ban compatibility because the read Nikkei 30 pro is more angled of their kind of Chinese market. The Paco f2 pro is more of a global European market angle. If that made any sense, the way I worded that 4700 mAh battery capacity, which has given me an all-day battery, and it charges from naught to full in just over one hour using the 30 watt fast charger. There is no wireless charging.
There is no ip68 rating, for example, I suppose they've got a cut corner somewhere to get it under the 500 price bracket. So my overall first impressions of the Paco f2 pro are really, really pretty good and if high refresh rate displays an IP rating and wireless charging aren't massively important to you or essential to you, then definitely one of the best phones. You can pick up right now I've actually been sent to Paco f2 pro phones, so I will be giving one of them away to one lucky person. All you have to do to enter is simply follow me on my other three social media channels, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook links to those will be left in the video description below and simply retweet the tweet that I put out on this giveaway. Does that sound like a plan? Good? Let's do this.
Let me know in the comment section what you think of the Paco f2 pro and what phones do you want to see it compared to, let me know again below, and I will try to make those videos for you like and share. If you enjoyed the video and found it helpful, subscribe and hit the notification bell if you're new to the channel and want to be notified every time. I post a video on anything tech news, unboxing reviews, I love, you leave me I, seen them at conferences, politics here too quick.
Source : ASBYT