Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro vs Samsung S20 Ultra AnTuTu Benchmark Test By TechNick

What's up guys your backward technique, and today we have another an tutu benchmark ground between the chamois meeting Pro OPPO find x2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S 20, ultra all rocking snapdragon 865 processing chips. The chamois has the lowest amount of RAM over here with the version that I have of 8 gigs of ram. We also have the latest updates and drivers available for the snapdragon we have in 1900, and we're going to be running game booster. In order to boost iron 2 to the OPPO find X to power comes with 12 gigs of RAM. That's the minimum spec. You can get also updated to the latest.

Color s. We have 120 Hertz panel, we're gonna, keep things that full HD Plus since that's native on the Shame, enable high performance mode and use game space to go into and through to version. Eight point: two point: nine. The Samsung I have the Snapdragon version of ear 12 gigs of ram we're going to be updating our software, as we did with the previous ones.120 Hertz refresh rate panel I'm gonna, keep things to full HD plus, and we are gonna, enable high performance mode and focus on performance in game booster and launch it from game launcher guys. This is Technic and without further ado.

Let's go we're gonna start here. We're taking a look at the hardware configurations of all devices feel free to hit pause. If you want to see more details, then we're gonna check out the battery at the start over here. So there are all different percentages here, but we'll compare that to the end result the hottest one so far in degrees Celsius is the Xiaomi and the lowest being the Samsung over there same case with CPU degrees Celsius. At the start, the Xiaomi being the hottest and the Samsung being the lowest it'll, be interesting to see how that stacks up at the end, we're going to start the tasty eye with 100% real time will speed up to 2400 %.

Later answer that I don't keep you guys here all day, but are we going to test out the Adrian 650, the GPU chipsets in all of these phones here? That is the graphics department of the snapdragon 865 processing chip. Here all of them are running pretty. Similarly, in time running, the Xiaomi is going slightly faster than the other two devices here, but all of them seemed really, really smooth. You can't see too much of a difference between the 90 words panel on the Xiaomi and the 120 hertz panels on the operand new Samsung. Once again, the Xiaomi is going slightly fast here, we're going to shoot to 2400 percent.

Now, after this little alien hits the camera and back to 100%. Real-Time checking out this boot and this wonderful scenery over here testing that Adrian GPU chip once more to test out how smooth these phones are. When looking at some rocks, I guess we're gonna, shoot things up again: 2,400 percents and go to the terracotta soldiers I've mentioned before this is my favorite part of the test, the most graphic demanding part of the test. That's why you can't see some jitteriness. It is kind of jittery on orbit of the devices you would expect it to be really smooth running the seven nanometer Plus technology chipset from Qualcomm over here.

It's not as smooth as you would want, though it is smoother than any other device that you will ever see around. These are pretty much the three top performing's phones on the market right now they all doing a superb job. They look really smooth at they highly refresh rate panels well at full HD plus resolution member. The Samsung is either/or, so either we have 120 Hertz at full, HD plus resolution or 60 Hertz at HD+ resolution with OPPO camera and HD+ resolution and 120 Hertz, but we've enabled all of them at just Full, HD plus to keep things even with the chamois. Since the max resolution we have on the chamois is indeed a full HD plus resolution, we're going to speed things up here and then test out those wonderful hertz panels when scrolling through the tests over here well an tutu does its own thing, but it does indeed show a little of what's going on with the frames per second that you see on these phones when it comes to scrolling, as you can see that the 120 Hertz on the offer is slightly quicker than that.

Seen on the Xiaomi, though, with slight more jitteriness, then you see on the Shame. The Xiaomi seems a little smoother. The Samsung is pretty much on par with the Oppo or speed things up again, and we're going to go to the final results here with the Xiaomi coming in first over there or the hottest phone in battery is the share either did not add the most amount of degrees in Celsius. That was the Oppo or adding seven point, eight degrees in Celsius and the operand Xiaomi, both lost 5% in battery, where the Samsung just lost 3% in battery and also been the coolest phone in the bunch. When it comes to CPU the Samsung once again was the coolest with CPU.

It only added six degrees, where the other two phones added eight degrees, Celsius, really impressed with their Samsung is cooling, is actually doing a perfect job yeah first place. We have five hundred and ninety thousand points on the Xiaomi lower than previous entry to test I've done. Five hundred and seventy-eight thousand on the upper in second place and five hundred and thirty-four thousand on the Samsung third place. That's actually increased from the last video I did benchmarking. The Samsung Galaxy is 20.

I'll trade actually got under 500,000 the last time, but because drivers were updated with the recent software updates and the NCT version, 8.29 has been established to work better with snapdragon 865 processing chip devices. It did do a better job. We have the Oppo or just 2.1 percent, worse than that of the Xiaomi and the Samsung just 9.5 percent, worse than that of the Xiaomi, but we have the best CPU on the Shame, the best memory and user experience on the operand the base GPU on the Samsung and until next time guys. This is technic.

Source : TechNick