Nokia 8.3 5G vs iPhone 11 Pro Camera Comparison | Is Nokia Back?! By TheMrNokia [Abdulla Zaki]

Hey guys it's Abdullah, and today I've got a very special comparison for you guys to check out. So I'm going to be comparing between the Nokia 8.3 against the iPhone 11 Pro max this camera. Before we do that, I would really appreciate, if you guys, can subscribe to the channel. Thank you very much. So, let's quickly go over the specs, so, as you guys know, the Nokia 8.3 has a 64 megapixel main camera with an aperture of f 1.89. It uses pixel binning technology, so it combines four pixels into one to produce 16 megapixel images.

It also has an ultra-wide 12 megapixel camera, which is quite large, and it has a large aperture of f 2.2. The other two cameras are 2 megapixel depth sensor, which helps with the portrait and both effects and a 2 megapixel micro camera. As for the iPhone, it has a more traditional setup, so it has a main 12 megapixel camera, with an aperture of f 1.8. The big advantage its main camera has over the Nokia is that it has optical image stabilization. As for the ultra-wide camera, it has a 12 megapixel camera with an aperture of f 2.4, and it's a smaller sensor compared to the one found on the Nokia. The third camera is a telephoto camera with two times zoom, and it also helps with the portrait images so which one of these phones captures better images and which one of these phones captures better video.

Let's get straight into the photo comparison in daylight. Both of these phones capture, excellent images, as you'd expect. The Nokia has a slight advantage when it comes to the dynamic range and I feel like it gets a more accurate looking sky. The iPhone, on the other hand, captures more pleasing looking images, because the Nokia suffers from over sharpening of the details. Because of this, the images captured on the iPhone look closer to how professional camera would look like the other advantage of the iPhone is that it captures good details throughout the whole frame of the image, while the Nokia suffers from the big sensor syndrome found on galaxy ultras from Samsung, for example.

What I mean by this is that the center of the image is in focus and has excellent details, but when you look at the edges, the details start to blur out and that's because the plane of focus is rather thin on the Nokia sensor for the ultra-wide images. However, the Nokia is the clear winner. It captures more details throughout the frame and that's thanks to a larger sensor and larger aperture. I also like that both of these phones try to capture colors from their ultra-right camera that really mimics the main cameras so yeah the Nokia takes the win for the ultrawide camera in low light images. However, both of these cameras- trade blows.

In my opinion, I think the Nokia captures slightly better images because it gets more accurate, looking colors, and this is in spite of the over sharpening, which occurs on the Nokia's images. The Nokia also captures more details in the highlights, while the iPhone really struggles, especially when it comes to handling light. The iPhone also tends to capture really warm looking low-light images, so that images turn out to look a bit too yellow for my liking. The Nokia is a lot more accurate. Having said that, the Nokia isn't perfect, as it tends to add the slight purple, slash pink tint to the low light images, but it's still more accurate than the iPhones.

I do prefer how the sky looks, though, in the iPhone's images, especially at night, compared to the Nokia which really struggles trying to capture details when it shouldn't in extreme low light situations. However, the iPhone has the upper hand. The Nokia simply doesn't capture more light than what your own eyes can see, while the iPhone does pull up this magic trick. I don't find this a very realistic situation where you'd want to capture images in the first place. The iPhone also has a very clear advantage when it comes to the video details captured, and it handles white balance a lot more consistently than the Nokia, and it also handles noise a bit better, especially in low light situations.

The iPhone, in my opinion, is still the king of capturing video on a smartphone, but what I really like about the Nokia is that it has a lot of advanced pro settings, so you can get the exact sort of tone that you want from your videos. This, on top of having the h-log format, means that the Nokia is a lot more tunable. So that's quite nice, and it gives it a nice advantage when it comes to versatility. Both of these phones do a perfect job when it comes to creating smooth footage, even though the Nokia does not have optical image stabilization. So in conclusion, I found that apple's approach is absolutely great for casual users.

Generally speaking, the phone knows exactly what it wants to do, and it doesn't give you control to try and adjust things your own way, so apple knows best, and you just have to sort of have faith in them. This is clearly shown when you're trying to force night mode in slightly dark images and the iPhone doesn't want to use night mode you'll end up with an image that almost looks no different at all. What I like about the Nokia is that this specific Nokia, the 8.3, is probably the best one for casual photographers, but it also still offers you all the manual controls and the settings that you want in order to tune the image the way you like, which one's better. Overall, though I'll, leave up to you. What positively surprised me, however, is that the Nokia can really keep up with the iPhone in most situations.

I just feel like, with a bit more fine-tuning, especially trying to tone down the over sharpening. For example, the Nokia can keep up, and it will be a much better competitor anyways, that's it from me. I hope you guys enjoyed this comparison. If you did, please don't forget to share like and subscribe, and I'll see you in the next one. You.

Source : TheMrNokia [Abdulla Zaki]