HTC U11 vs Galaxy S8 Camera Test Comparison By SuperSaf

By SuperSaf
Aug 15, 2021
0 Comments
HTC U11 vs Galaxy S8 Camera Test Comparison

What's, the beach exactly on Super Size TV and welcome to another super sass style camera comparison this time between the HTC. U 11 on the Samsung, Galaxy S8, so in the usual style, we'll be looking at both the front and rear facing cameras and images, as well as video to do also look out for the audio icon in the corner of the screen and that will indicate to you which device the audio is coming from. I'll, be switching between these two to give you guys a better idea of the differences in audio as well, so we're currently using the front-facing cameras on both devices, we're in my car, it's daylight outside, so we've got plenty of light coming in, and we are going to be heading outside doing some rear facing camera test. Some stabilization tests, as well as some low-light tests. So let's get straight to it. Now we're going to test out the stabilization from the front-facing cameras.

So, let's go ahead and start running so now, looking at the video from the rear facing cameras, we're filming at 4k right now and let's go ahead and take a bit of a walk at 4k. So we can see what stabilization is like at okay. Now we've switched over to 1080p, and we're going to test that stabilization. So we have a walk. Let's turn that into a run our indoors with the HTC? U 11 just testing out the autofocus, and it seems to be doing really well snapping on very quickly now same lighting with the s8.

Also, super-duper fast, I'm, really not sure which one's faster. Let me know what you guys think, so that was the video now before we move on to some images just to go over what we're working with here, so the rear facing camera. Is there pretty much the same with 12 megapixels Annette 1.7 aperture, an optical image stabilization? We do, however, have quite a big difference for the front-facing cameras. The U 11 does have double the resolution.16 megapixels versus eight, but the sh+ does have a wider aperture as well as autofocus from the front facing camera. This is not something that many devices offer if you want to pick up a skin for your device like I, have done here, for my s8 then definitely check out a sponsor for this video, which is Addie brown.

Skin they've got a huge selection of skins for lots of different devices, and I'll leave a link to them in the description below now. One last thing to mention is that all images have been taken on automatic I've, not tweaked any settings, and this is to keep things as fair as possible. So kicking off with some selfies here is a selfie in my car, as I normally take I think both are doing perfect. You can see lots of detail colors. Also, very nice and similar.

The u11 has flipped the image, but that's no big deal in terms of dynamic range. They also seemed quite similar. They have blown out the highlights in the background. Now, let's go in 100%, and here you can see that you can crop it much further on the u11, and that is because it has a much higher resolution, but the s8 looks Sharper here. I think this comes down to the autofocus that the front-facing camera of the s8 has, and it has snapped onto my face quite nicely.

Although the U 11 looked fine when we were viewing it at a normal angle, as soon as we went in 100%, you can see that it's not as sharp as the s8 now taking a low-light selfie outside and the street lighting, the SAT is definitely brighter. Overall, although we have lost some color on the SC, the 11 has maintained a little more color compared to the SE, but I think the wider aperture of the s8 is what's resulting in the brighter image now testing out the front-facing flashes on both devices. This is where the front display is illuminated. I feel like the U 11. Here.

Live it better. It seems a tad sharper and the colors are also a little better maintained. The is 2 doing a decent job, but there seems to be a bit more of a green tint on here compared to the u 11 now moving on to an outdoor macro shot both are doing great here. You've got lots of detail and a nice shallow depth of field because of that F 1.7 aperture, on both going in 100%. Both have a good amount of detail.

I do like the s8 image a little better here, and that is because it's maintained the colors a little better compared to the U 11, which has gone more towards the light side, and we are losing some detail on the flower where it's gone to white now, moving on to an outdoor, wide shot. I think both are doing great here. Lots of detail very difficult to pick a winner here, but I do think. By 11 has slightly better dynamic range. If you look towards the cloud, you can see that some more of those details have been maintained compared to the s8, but very, very close, indeed, testing out another outdoor wide shot.

This time, it's actually in it to the sunset. So a bit more of a tricky situation here both are doing very similar. Yes, it is a little more vibrant and I think. If we look closely towards the middle, then you can notice that the U 11 has slightly better dynamic range compared to the s8 here now going on to low-light. So this is an indoor low-light shots.

I think the accent is doing better he's got a brighter image, and it's also got less noise compared to that of the U 11. Now to take the low-light test further, when outdoors and here both are actually doing really well now going on 100%, you can see that both are performing really well. The Texas up here, I think that does go down to the optical image stabilization that both wouldn't have slight differences in color. There is a bit of a green tint here on the u11, but nothing major in between them. I think both of them are performing really well in low light.

Now. Finally, testing out the flash on both devices I think both are doing very similar here. Slight differences in color slightly warmer on the SE, slightly cooler on the u11 I think I do prefer the cooler look on the u11, but I think that will come down to personal preference. So there we have it guys. The super soft style camera comparison between the ATC u11 under the Samsung Galaxy S8, to conclude, I think for the front-facing camera the s8 did have better video, better dynamic range.

The video quality was also sharper, and it was also more stable for images. It also seemed to be sharper and I think that does come down to the autofocus that it's got, but the HTC did have a high resolution, so you can crop in further on the HTC now for video from the rear-facing camera I think quality wise, both are very good. I did find that the s8 was more stable. However, for autofocus I think they were very similar. It was difficult to tell them apart both of superfast and for outdoor images.

Also, I think both were very good for the macro shot. I did prefer the s8, but for the wide shots the HTC did seem to have better dynamic range now for low-light indoors. The is did seem to perform better, but when we went outdoors, I think it was pretty much neck and neck with just slight differences in color and finally for audio I. Think the HTC did sound better overall I listened a few times. You can go back and have a listen, but I think that 3d audio does definitely help the HTC.

So overall, very, very close here I think both have a very, very good camera, some of the best out there. That's what I think. Anyway. What do you guys think definitely comment below and let me know your thoughts, you don't see? Lots of images from lots of different devices then give me a follow-on Instagram and that's super soft TV I hope you enjoyed this video and found it useful. If you did them, please do hit that thumbs up button.

For me, readers helped me out and if you have already then be sort subscribe and switching notifications, there's lots more camera comparisons and tech videos coming up on here. Thanks for watching this is staph on super sec. TV I'll see you next time.


Source : SuperSaf

Phones In This Article


Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu