Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 vs iPhone X A11 Bionic SPEED Test! OMG!!! By Shane Starnes

By Shane Starnes
Aug 15, 2021
0 Comments
Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 vs iPhone X A11 Bionic SPEED Test! OMG!!!

What's up guys chances are you enjoyed my T. rex I've been using the galaxy s.9 is my main device for the past week, and it's one of the fastest devices that I've ever used. However, is it fast enough to beat the iPhone 10 we've already seen a few speed tests of the Enos version of the galaxy s 9 I haven't had this snapdragon 845 version of the galaxy s 9? How does the snapdragon 845 Galaxy S 9 compete with the iPhone 10 when it comes to performance? We're about to find out this is the iPhone 10 versus Galaxy S 9 speed test? Let's go ahead and get started. This is the speed test that you've all been waiting for. We had the iPhone 10 on the left side, with the a11 Bionic chip and three gigabytes of RAM. We've got the US variant of the galaxy s 9 with the Snapdragon 845 processor and four gigabytes of RAM.

Who knows who's going to win this speed test so far when we're looking at just stock apps and light applications like social media applications, it looks like the iPhone 10 is doing a pretty good job at the galaxy s.9 has the slight advantage. It's only when we run into the more intensive applications like these gaming applications where the galaxy s 9 is going to slow down just a little, as you guys can see here on subway surfers the iPhone 10 completely catches up to the galaxy s 9 at the galaxy s, 9 has actually lost its entire lead. Its whole advantage has gone out the window. As you can see here. The iPhone 10 is also able to load up Temple Run 2 a lot quicker than the galaxy s 9.

The snapdragon 845 is supposed to be the better graphics processor, but it looks like the a11 chip is doing an excellent job at processing these graphics with the games, and we're almost finished with the first lab with the iPhone 10, and it finishes at one minute and 14 seconds, and we're off to the races. The iPhone 10 is not having to reload any applications from scratch. As you guys can see the galaxy s not, on the other hand, was able to finish the first lap at about a minute in 19 seconds, which is pretty respectable. It was just a little behind the iPhone 10, but, as you guys can see here, the iPhone 10 is not having to reload any of the applications from scratch. In fact, it even has these games kind of on pause in the background, we're only having to wait a few seconds for them to resume.

Meanwhile, the galaxy s 9 is having to load everything from scratch, so even things as simple as Facebook, it was having to load from scratch. As you can see here, Netflix had to load from scratch. All of our games had to load from scratch, so we're having to wait on the Galaxy S nine to just simply load up the games, whereas the iPhone 10 had those games in the background and waiting. The iPhone 10 only has three gigabytes of RAM the galaxy s.9 has four gigabytes of RAM, but, as you can see, the galaxy s 9 is not able to take full advantage of that. Ram Touch ID has been a poor RAM manager in the past and what they're doing here is they're trying to optimize the battery life on the galaxy s 9.

But it comes at the cost of multitasking and performance the few seconds here and there that it takes to reload an application from scratch. More than likely won't be a game changer in day-to-day use, and you're only ever really probably going to see this in a test similar to this, but, as you guys can see here, we're wrapping up the final lap on the galaxy s 9, and it comes in at 2 minutes and 40 seconds, almost a full minute behind the iPhone 10, which is pretty surprising in day-to-day use. The galaxy s 9 is incredibly fast, and I really felt like it would hold its own against the iPhone 10. Obviously there were some RAM management issues with that.4 gigabytes of RAM is speed of performance, and especially multitasking is a big deal to you. You will probably more than likely want to go with the galaxy s 9 plus, which does have 6 gigabytes of RAM.

I, really wish that Samsung would have just given us 6 gigabytes of RAM on the galaxy s, 9 there's no point in putting an Achilles heel in your device when you really don't have to I'm, not really sure why they didn't just go with the extra 6 gigabytes of RAM. Were you expecting this huge of a defeat for the Galaxy S 9? Let me know your thoughts in the comments that about wraps it up for this video. If you liked the video be sure to give it a big thumbs up subscribe to this channel for more content like this in the future, you'll find more of me at Droid motor COM. Follow me on Twitter a droid, muttering X. Thanks guys for watching be blessed.

I'll see you in the next one.


Source : Shane Starnes

Phones In This Article


Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu