Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Camera Review By TechTalk

Okay so today I'm going to be doing a more in-depth look at the camera of the Xiaomi Redmi Note, 10. Um, so going to go out for a walk. Take a load of photos, do a bit of video on the front facing camera and the rear. It's not going to be. You know, hours long. It's just going to be a quick look, and then I'll talk a bit about the photos and the video and let you know what I think.

So, let's go so video Xiaomi Redmi Note, 10, front-facing camera come on in 1080p, 30 frames per second, it's not bad! I'm not going anywhere yeah! Pretty good quality stabilization is good yeah. It didn't it. Oh, you're talking about the trolls okay, so yeah, not bad, not a bad camera. Um, like I said, stabilization's good. It's handling the bright behind me.

Yes, darling, trolls, so yeah, pretty good. Okay. So back from the walk um, I've spoken a little about my opinions on the front facing camera and a bit on the rear as you've seen in those past videos. So now what I'm going to do is I'm going to put a load of the photos up and talk a little more in detail on what I think of them, how I think they've performed so, if you're enjoying stick around, I won't waffle on for too long. I promise and then, if you like this video, please consider subscribing and leave some comments down below that'd be great.

So let's go right. Okay, so I thought I'd get the worst photos at the way, the worst meaning my ugly mug. So this is taken obviously on the selfie camera. This is not in portrait mode um. I actually really like the selfie camera of the Redmi Note 10.

Um, it's a vast improvement on the Redmi Note 9, which, to be honest, I thought was terrible um. There wasn't a lot of detail in that one. Um pictures were grainy um and just a lot of rubbish really um, but this one seems to be a much bigger improvement. Um. There's lots of detail here, um.

You know the individual hairs on my rubbish beard attempt on the bottom, so that's pretty good and then, if we flip across to portrait mode um again it is nice and detailed um. You know all the the inside fluff on my hoodie and then on my face there and if I do a bit of zooming on here, so the separation of the subject is pretty good. I mean. Obviously you can, you know. There's I mean with my hair, how I have it today: there's not any, not many stray hairs or wavy hair for it to kind of make it that tricky um.

So it's done a done, a pretty good job. We go down there. You know you can see where it's trying around under my ear but then again from a distance you're, not really going to see that, so it's a nice milky blur from that portrait mode, so yeah, I'm really chuffed with the selfie camera there. So if we go on to here, this is just on the main lens um. So nice bright conditions, um good amount of detail, um pretty natural um to what what it actually looks like through the eye, and then, if I flip across, is the ultra-wide on this one looks really similar um a lot of the time on certain photos from an ultra-wide pictures will be a lot softer and the color temperature will be different.

But this looks quite similar to that main lens, and then here is, I think it's the five times digital zoom. You know you can see on here that it's losing detail um, but it's to be expected. You're not going to get huge amounts of detail on this. But you know if you want to get just a little closer to something. You know absolutely fine for that.

Okay, so this next one here this is on the main lens again nice and sharp. Actually, you know you can see a lot of detail on the tree. Stump um, nice, bright, blue sky, and you know the water there, so it yeah it all looks it all looks decent on this next one- if I remember rightly on this particular one, it does change more than what it did on the previous one. So this one does look a lot softer. You can see that there's not as much detail in the tree stump, but you know the color of the sky and the water is very similar.

So that's just the main thing that I noticed as it is a lot softer and then, if you go forward again onto the digital crop, it's the same thing um with the other one. You know it's. You can tell that it's a digital crop um! Furthermore, you know it's its just about usable, I think um, but then trouble is when you put a phone. If you put a photo like this onto somewhere like Facebook, which degrades images even more than it's gonna. Look a lot worse, so I would probably try and stick to just using photos from the main or the ultra-wide this one again.

This was shooting. I mean the sun was kind of up here somewhere, so this is shooting towards sort of relatively harsh light um, and it's done a pretty good job. Um everything seems to be seems to be pretty good. There's nothing um struggling from what I can see. Of course, this is always my opinions, and I'm not an expert I'm just going by what I think of a particular image ultra-wide here again um.

You can see parts of the sky up here, um. You know where the sun is, so it's starting to affect the image there um. But again it's done a pretty good job at keeping everything looking nice and then third time's a charm, exactly the same story with this a lot of lost details, quite grainy um- and you know the blue sky- is not very blue, so you have lost um a bit of saturation in this one, so the grass doesn't look as green. The sky doesn't look as blue, which you know if you really wanted to. You could adjust that in post, but I wouldn't bother so this one.

I just sort of tried to get a little low onto the grass just to see how it would come out um it's decent, I mean. Obviously this is the main part, that's in focus here and then that one strand there and that one strand of grass a little there is in focus, but there's a nice amount of blur in the background um. It's kept all of that sharp, so it hasn't tried like what some phones may do. It's tried to blur a bit of that out um and that one there it's kept the whole strand, nice and sharp blurred the front. So it's focused on this area here, and you know it's different um.

It doesn't look too bad. This was on the macro lens um, so I just had a go at seeing what I could get from that. Obviously, at the resolution that the macro lens is um you're not going to get a huge amount of detail anyway, um, but you know they're they're, not bad um, better than the macro mode on the Redmi Note 9, that's for sure and then again on this one there. So it's you know reasonable amount of detail. Color looks good so again a vast improvement on the Redmi Note 9.

Okay. So that's my thoughts on the camera of the Redmi Note 10. On the whole, I quite like it. Um compromises, obviously digital zoom, but it's not restricted to just this phone you'll, get that on almost every other phone. In this price point, the ultra-wide angle lens comes out a lot softer, but again it's ultra-wide lenses.

They've never got the best sensors in the world, smaller apertures, so the detail is never going to be like what the main lens is, and they're generally lower resolution anyway um. So it's to be expected from a budget phone um, the main camera. However, I do like um it produces nice photos that color wise are true to life, um, good detail, um and the selfie camera. I actually really like, as I said, it's a vast improvement on the Redmi Note 9, which I thought was absolute tosh, so yeah, I'm quite chuffed. The video from both phones is decent stabilization at 4k on the main lens again is not great, but on the flip side, the stabilization on the front lens was actually perfect.1080P granted um, but yeah it was still, still pretty good, and the audio pickup from both was perfect as well. So let me know what you think of the Redmi Note 10.

Do you have one drop some comments below drop some comments as well um on some photos? What you think I'd love to hear, and we can get a chat going so until next time stay safe tune in for my next video, and thank you for watching.

Source : TechTalk