Mi 10 Camera Review - Imaging Champ! By RevAtlas

Hey guys welcome back to yet another video on Drive, Atlas, I'm, Sandeep and you're, watching the camera review of the 10. Now before we get started, please do make sure to hit the subscribe button. Now, let's get this rolling. There's a quad camera set up at the back of which the star attraction is definitely the primary camera, which is 108, Mixed Samsung AMX sensor with one by one point: three inch sensor size optical image, stabilization, NF, 1.7 lens. You also get a 13 megapixel F 2.4, ultra wide-angle camera, as well as a tomb, a pixel macro camera and two man pixel depth sensors, both with F 2.4 approaches as well focuses quick on the 10, and it also captures images with accurate white balance. Even with the air mode turned off, the images are a bit more saturated than normal.

The dynamic range is excellent, and most of the time you don't even need to use the HDR mode and keeping it off, which it does by default, often gives you more natural. Looking images as well, but when you do need extra dynamic range. Turning on HDR will help extract that additional bit of information from the shadows resulting in shorts with lesser contrast, meanwhile, adding a bit more saturation in the process as well. You can also make use of night mode in daylight situations, ?, which increases the dynamic range even further, also adding clarity in the mix. If you are into having images that are dynamic and vivid, then turning on ear mode will definitely help.

As you can see from the results here, images are short in 25 min 'epic silly by default, and although combining 4 pixels into one and calculating 108 divided by 4, should give you 27 megapixels, you actually get twenty-five megapixel resolution files in the end. The reason for this is that it also crops in ever so slightly after pixel pinning, but you can see after you compare the two images side-by-side shooting a hunter named. A pixel gives higher level of noise with slightly better sharpness in some situations, but mostly the same level of sharpness in others. Coming to portraits having such a large sensor as well as a large F, 1.7 aperture means you get a very shallow depth of field without even using the portrait mode and in fact, in most situations, you're better off without using portrait mode. Unless you really need to do so more often than not getting close to the subject or object or having some difference in distance between your point of focus or background is good enough for the sensor to shine through.

However, one downside of this is the plus a quick focus fall-off which, to be honest, I, don't mind for what we get in return. In fact, depth of field is so good at times that they both practically look identical with or without portrait mode, but it does kick into play in certain scenarios or if you look closely, you can see the minor differences which mainly involve smoothing of the bouquet and lesser dynamic range, but, more importantly, inserted into Kate situations. The blurring goes wrong in terms of edge detection. The other great thing is that it even works at a distance also and in good lighting conditions. It works pretty quick and, while it's not quite as fast as the pixel, it can still capture children, pets and other moving subjects pretty well.

You also have the portrait cinematic option which letterboxes your 16:9 images to create very impressive pseudo 20-9 images and, if used well, these can definitely be very impressive as well in terms of low-light performance. The 10 is an absolute beast I'm, yet to compare it side-by-side with the pixel devices, but I have a feeling that it could be as good, if not better than them. Thanks to the large sensor in aperture, you can also use night mode and get even better results with very low noise, excellent sharpness and detail, as well as no shakes thanks to wireless, the ultra wide-angle camera allows for a more dramatic field of view and Composition. However, there's difference between the primary and ultra wide-angle camera in terms of the image processing its more neutral compared to the richer colors on the primary camera and has a cooler, color tone, sharpness and detail are good at the center, but towards the edges. It gets a bit softer.

Low-Light imaging is not very good on the ultra wide-angle camera, especially owing to the fact that it doesn't have night mode, and the sensor is small, coupled with a smaller approach as well. Macro camera is decent, but again I would have appreciated its telephoto camera instead or a more capable 5. Megapixel macro camera like on the no time pro series, but this is what we get and here are some samples from it. There's no telephoto camera on the meet and which some might be looking for in a flagship, but then again I guess they needed that to be one of the differentiating factors on the meet and Pro. Luckily, the primary sensor itself is very capable and shopped.

Then you can crop in 2x either during shooting, using the 2x toggle or in post-production and still have very usable results. It isn't a replacement for a telephoto camera, surely, and I wish that Xiaomi provided one, but it's still much better than other devices that produce weird results after cropping. The front-facing camera is 20 maps ELF 2 unit, that's housed within the display cutout in the upper-left corner of the screen. They major from the front camera decent, but not great, as they do exhibit over sharpening as well as noise. Dynamic range is overall, pretty good, but there is a tendency to post a darker at first frame than most other devices.

Still, this is an easy fix and post the sharpness and detail are decent, but not too great, and this is evident to a new pixel peep. The portrait mode is great in terms of the blur applied, as well as the edge detection and only rarely gets light issues near the ear tips, but again not too bad. The sharpness and detail seems better than regular mode. In fact, so it seems like the main reason for reduction in sharpness is happening due to frame stacking during SDR as a portrait mode doesn't have HDR and, as a result highlights have a tendency to be overexposed. Videos can be recorded up to 4k 30fps mode with yes, but the 80 and 60 FPS modes in 4k and 1080p don't get years.

For some reason. I can understand 8k without EIS and may be 4k 62, but I definitely would have expected 1080p 60fps to come with. Yes, so also worth noting that the 8k video is actually being captured at 6k and then interpolated to 8k resolution, still there's plenty of detail and excellent sharpness in this mode, as you can see, even from our video that we put our earlier, which we shall link at the end of this video, the only downside is like a said. Lack of E is, and also slightly more focus hunting but overall worth the trade-off, especially if you have a gimbals or tripod 8k. Video nitrate is over 100 megabits per second and 4 KV.

Do is also good in terms of detail and stabilization with roughly half the nitrate front-facing. Camera can shoot up to 1080p 30fps videos, but there is no 4k mode, nor does the EIS, which, to be honest, isn't very good on a flagship device. The sharpness is great and there's good detail as well, but the overall dynamic range itself is also not very good. Hey guys, it's only from Refit less, and this is the front-facing camera on the meat end, capturing 1080p, 30fps video. Let me know what you guys.

Think of all the overall sharpness dynamic range. How well has become my voice in the scenario and the aura stabilization as the pro mode is quite extensive and, like we saw in the Redmi Note 9 pro max. You get similar features here too, including pro mode for both photos and videos and in photos. You can choose a minimum speed of one by four thousandth of a second and max shutter speed of 30 seconds. Similarly, it has a base, is of 64, but can go all the way up until ISO 6400 hundred email, Mixed captures supported as well as off photo capture and videos are also supported up to 4k as well and support for log and cinematic video modes, but keep in mind that log is in support in 8k and maxes out at 4k 30fps overall the meet and comes with an excellent primary camera that does amazing photos both in good lighting conditions low-light in terms of the portraits that it captures and is one of the best that we have seen in the Android camp.

The videos are also pretty great, except wanting an is enabled in more modes and I also think that they could use with a bit of tweaking in terms of the software processing. However, the main issue here is the LED down from the front camera, both in terms of photos and videos which need to be fine-tuned better, and, apart from that, I also wish that it came with the telephoto camera. But then again, this does come with an ultra wide-angle camera, which I do find more useful instead of a telephoto camera. So if brands like Apple and Google are forgiven for not bundling a telephoto camera or an ultra wide-angle camera respectively, then I don't see why we can't accept the meet and for not having a telephoto camera, considering that it has such a great primary camera. At the end, the meeting is one of the best cameras currently on the market in terms of photos, and while videos need a bit of fine-tuning, that too is pretty good thanks for watching this video, please don't forget to hit the subscribe button, see again in the next one.

Source : RevAtlas