IQ is finally here on Indian soil, with their first smartphone, which also happens to be one of the first Phi G smartphones in India. This is Sunday from Rev Atlas, and here is our camera review of the IQ 3 Phi G smartphone. What do you get with the echo 3 is the quad camera setup? The main camera is a 48 man, pixel Sonia MX 582 sensor with F 1.79 aperture, while you get a secondary ultra-wide 13, my pixel F 2.2 camera, a 13 megapixel telephoto camera with F 2.5 purchase and lastly, to my pixel F 2.4 depth. Sensor. Photos captured are good overall in terms of the color output, but there's a tendency to produce warmer looking images than reality. Dynamic range is good with the HDR mode and if you need anything better using night mode in some situations does help to a certain extent, by improving the dynamic range, especially in the shadows.
The sharpness and detail are good and, in fact, seem better than the Realme X 50 pro 5 G that we tried recently despite having lower pixel count, but there's something that we can confirm in a comparison. Video, so do. Let us know if you want to see that it doesn't do too well with foliage and exhibits. Watercolor effects in such situations default photos are captured in 12 megapixel resolution that combines 4 pixels into one and gives a resulting pixel size, a 1.6 micron compared to 0.8 micron pixel default size. But if you want, you can shoot a full 48.
My pixel resolution, as well without pixel, pinning and doing so gives larger resolution and files that are roughly three times the size of the pixel bin images. You don't get much of a benefit from this, as sharpness is more or less the same. It's not worse, and often higher levels of noise, so using 12 megapixels would make more sense. The primary camera seems to be the most laid back when it comes to processing, while the ultra-wide and telephoto camera seems to increase the saturation and contrast more, but in some situations it can be the other way around and in some rare scenarios they also look almost identical to in terms of low-light. Performance is better to make use of night mode few on the best quality, possible-- and performance is decent, but not great, and not something that I would call flagship great night mode reduces the noise increases the clarity which also gives a parent feeling of higher sharpness and better detailing portrait photos with people.
Look good as a glance, however. Zooming in will reveal the issues with nest, detection and also the fact that there is some softening applied to a skin. Even though the beauty mode is turned off, you can capture portraits with either the regular telephoto and the lotto has slightly better edge detection and edge detection. Blurring is better if you try on objects using the bookie mode, as these samples will demonstrate the ultra wide-angle camera does a good job at offering a dramatic perspective and still impressive, looking images, but it doesn't carry the same level of detail and sharpness to the primary camera, but it's still decent, but even some chromatic aberrations towards the corners of the frame, especially when there's a stark difference in luminance ultra wide-angle camera can focus Freddie up close, but there is a dedicated super macro mode that you can enable and doing so give some great macro shots and is perhaps one of the best microphones we've seen so far. You can get real close to the action.
It seems like it's using the regular camera on ultra wide-angle camera together to get this result, because, although blocking the ultra wide-angle camera shows that the viewfinder is blacked out in this particular mode, the perspective from the images seemed closer to the 1x regular camera either way well done here to the IQ team. Telephoto camera is good in terms of offering a better reach, especially in those situations where you can't move closer to the subject or object, but in terms of the optical quality itself, it does feel much inferior compared to the primary camera, especially due to a lower detail and sharpness. There's also, some color noise that's easily visible, even in situations where there's good light involved. The front-facing camera is 16 mm, pixel f/2 point for Samsung's sensor. That's housed in a display, cutout selfies aren't too great in terms of detail and sharpness, and overall we would have expected better results from a phone in this segment, but it is what it is.
The front portrait mode is not too great, and we found the blur to be over aggressive and the edge detection is perhaps a bit too lenient and that results in the blur leaking onto portions, where you would have liked to have better focus and no blurring. You can shoot videos with all three cameras at is primary ultra-wide and telephoto. You can shoot up to 4k, 60 or 1080p 60 with the primary and telephoto cameras, while the ultra-wide only supposed 1080p 30, yes, is only found in 1080p modes for the primary and telephoto cameras. While there is no yes at all, while 40 and 60 don't get yes and surprised at the 4k, 60fps mode does exist. Considering the dynamics by 82 is supposed to have an upper limit of 4k 30.
Only now I'm not really sure why there isn't an option for EIS, at least at 4k 30, as the 4th hardware is definitely powerful enough to handle it with ease. As a result, I would generally offer 1080p modes to get a more refined look thanks to he is and, to be honest, the EAS is amazing one of the most stable implementations we have seen and does a great job, even when taking a brisk walk if you're, jogging and running can even make use of the ultra steady mode, but doing so reduces the video quality by a fair bit. It has more clarity as well as more noise I'm here, the looking colors and finally, this is a way to force the camera to capture 60fps 1080p. Video sweetie is as the regular 1080p 60fps videos don't support. Yes, the video shot with the ultra wide-angle camera have some sort of jitter, especially apparent in the top of the frame, not sure what is causing this, but there could be something that could be fixed with the software update the front-facing camera.
Video is not all that great as the nitrate is low and seems like the sharpness, isn't all that great, either and audio seems low as well. Let me know what you guys think about the sharpness dynamic range. How Ellis became my voice in this scenario and the stabilization as well slow motion. Videos can be recorded at 240 FPS in 720p or 120 FPS at 1080p and quality is surprisingly good in this case, but it does have a tendency to focus on, especially if you move quite a bit in the hole it seems like the ICO.3 camera setup is quite impressive, and it's definitely better than what we saw with the Realme x50 pro 5g in terms of detail. Portraits video, despite the seemingly lower and Hardware in the phone, is still doing perform better thanks to better image, processing and software optimization, and it would be interesting to see how it actually fares in a detailed comparison as well.
That's it for this video guys. If you have any questions, do let us know in the comment section below see you again in the next one and don't forget to hit the subscribe button.
Source : RevAtlas