iPhone 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Camera Comparison By The Hybrid Shooter

Hello, my friends today we will be comparing camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S 20, ultra and iPhone 11 Pro s, 20 ultra has very impressive camera setup with large 108 megapixel main sensor. As I've already shown you, this sensor can capture very impressive stills for a smartphone iPhone 11 Pro is still a benchmark for all-around, usable smartphone camera. It takes great stills and even better video. In this video. We will try to find out which of these to shoot. You get if you want the best possible smartphone camera performance, iPhone, 11, Pro uses 3 12, megapixel cameras, 13 millimeters, ultra-wide 26, millimeter wide and 52 millimeter telephoto is.

The main sensor size is one over two point: fifty-five inch type, which is commonly used size in smartphones, s20 ultra uses, 12 megapixels, ultra-wide camera with 13 millimeters, lens 108, megapixel, main camera with 26 millimeter lenses and 64 mega pixel telephoto zoom, with up to 104 millimeter optical zoom. The main camera uses much larger one over 1.33 inch sensor. The first thing that I will mention is the size of both devices. The disadvantage of the s20 ultra camera setup is that you can only have it in very large six point. Nine inch, phablet I, would much prefer something at least a bit smaller I.

Don't think that this size is practical, but if you wanted at 108 megapixel sensor, you have to go with the ultra with the iPhone. You can have this camera set up in 5.8 inch smartphone, which is a huge advantage for me. Personally. You can get similarly sized as 20, but that one has completely different camera setup. Let's take a look at the main cameras.

iPhone uses one over 2.55 inch, 12 megapixel sensor on the main camera. This is pretty standard sensor size for a smartphone. It uses 26, millimeter full-frame, equivalent lens, which is also standard and a good choice in my opinion, and it takes really nice steals. There is good amount of details. The processing is a bit less over than in comparison with some other smartphones and I.

Also like the colors s20 ultra uses much larger one over 1.33 inch sensor. It also shoots 12 megapixel stills by default, but it has that 108 megapixel mode in 12 megapixels melt in good light. There is not that much of a difference as 20 ultra maybe captures a tiny bit more detail, but unless you zoom to at least 300%, you won't see any difference in 108 megapixels melt. It is quite a bit different. The difference in terms of the details is pretty massive.

I have to say it is the same deal as when comparing any smartphone any real camera. How much of a difference really actually see depends on your viewing device on Instagram on Facebook or on your smartphone screen. You will see no difference at all here on 32 inches, 4k screen I can say that I can realistically see a difference. iPhone 11 Pro is more than sufficient for the usual usage. Nevertheless, if you want to capture the maximal amount of details, s20 ultra with 108 megapixel mode is the way to go.

Both cameras have F 1.8 a picture by the s20 Ultra has larger sensor, so it can blur the background more. Regarding the raw capabilities s, 20 Ultra has very impressive, dynamic range. The files contain a lot of information thanks to large print pixels, 108 megapixel mode doesn't work with Ross, though, so we want to get that big detail advantage here. The iPhone actually holds up very well in good light. It also captures a lot of information for a smartphone.

You can push it pretty far before it starts falling apart. I would say that the main difference will be that the s20 ultra kind of has Richard look. It is closer to small sensor real camera. If you know how to use it, s, 20 Atria will provide bears, but again the iPhone is also more than sufficient for intended purposes. The one also has one significant advantage: if you use halite camera, which is what you should use, you can have DOG RAW files and HDR hie see pictures on the s20 ultra.

You need to sacrifice HDR capabilities in AEC files. If you want to shoot raw. The ultra-wide cameras are very similar on both used 12 megapixels, sensors and 13 millimeter full-frame, equivalent lens, with fixed focus both produce acceptable. Stills with a lot of sharpening and post-processing, the image quality is not that great, but interesting field of view can make up for that. I prefer iPhone ultra-wide shots a bit, because the processing is a bit less aggressive, more neutral, and I like the HDR functionality more on the iPhone.

Having said that, both are very similar, and the difference is quite marginal. Neither can shoot rows using ultra white lines. The telephoto lenses are quite a bit different though iPhone use is pretty simple setup with 12 megapixel sensor, 52 millimeters, full-frame, equivalent and F 3.0 aperture. The image quality is actually pretty good. It captures a lot of detail.

There is no optical zoom on this slice, but for my personal usage, 50 millimeter fixed lenses works very well as 20 Ultra has optical zoom on the main camera, and it goes up to 104 millimeter full-frame equivalent. It is a 64 megapixel sensor, but the resolution is only for cropping: it will always output.12, megapixel, stills I think that the image code is usable up to 10 times zoom, which is about two hundred and sixty millimeter full-frame equivalent, which is impressive. It is definitely a useful feature which increases versatility of the camera setup. Personally, I. Don't use telephoto lenses that much even on my proper cameras, so I am fine with 52 millimeter lenses on the iPhone as well.

Processing and both is oriented more towards consumers. So there is a lot of sharpening a lot of saturation and heavy use of HDR. I would say that I phone processing is a bit less of an overkill, and it looks a bit more natural to me. Samsung uses a bit more aggressive processing, but I'm not complaining about that, because a lot of non-professional users like this kind of heavy processing for me personally, iPhone, is still a winner here. When it comes to video.

It is important to understand that super-high resolution sensors and not idea of a shooting video as I've explained in previous videos. That is why Sony a7, 3 or Panasonic s1, our better video cameras than Sony, a7r, 4 or Panasonic s1 rs.20 ultra uses pixel binning to shoot 4k video, interestingly Samsung is almost breaking about using pixel painting, whereas in proper camera world pixel being basically means sorry, we can do it. The proper way, which would be the full sensor readout this- is completely normal with every high resolution sensor. It is just important to keep it in mind. The video out of the main camera looks good for a smartphone, but I will say right away that I, like the iPhone 11 Pro more for video.

Again it looks more natural. It retains more detail and I like the processing. More s20 Ultra can also shoot 8k video. It can capture a bit more detail, but aggressive processing just kills the detail in majority of cases. The image stabilization also doesn't work very well in 8k, and there is a big additional crop.

It may be useful in some very specific cases, but it is not very useful for all around shooting the ultra-wide video again is very similar on both and the difference will mainly be caused by the processing ultra-wide. Video also has the worst image quality on both phones, but it can make up for dead with interesting field of view. Regarding the autofocus on s 20 ultra, there are still some issues even after the latest. Firmware update, especially the close focusing, is not very reliable and there is some haunting having said that, it works well in the majority of situations. I have still noticed some issues with a telephoto lens, autofocus on s trans ultra in low-light and more extreme sitter iPhone uses dual pixel system, and the other focus is basically perfect on the 11pro.

It is 100%, accurate and basically instant, so iPhone 11 Pro wins here. The ultra-wide camera uses fixed focus on both, so there are no issues here. The stabilization is great. On both buy the iPhone 11 Pro still has an edge, it is just a little smoother, but both are more than sufficient for static shots and pen ink both can also smooth out the walking very well stabilization is getting a lot of attention on every kind of consumer cameras nowadays, and that is, in my opinion, very good, because it can make a big difference in overall look. The night mode is actually very similar in both x20 ultra has much larger sensor, but the results look very similar.

It also largely depends on the specific scene. It provides good results on both, considering that these are smartphones, and it makes a big difference overall. Having said that, I will definitely still use proper mirrorless camera for low-light. The camera apps on the 11pro and s20 ultra are basically the complete opposite. iPhone has very simple camera app a couple of simple modes, and that is basically it.

It works well for consumers, but advanced users who want to shoot raw have to use third-party app I use halite, which works great I, have made a separate video about that, and it will be linked in the description on the s20 I'll show. You have a ton of options, settings and modes. You can also customize it. There is a pro mode for manual settings and raw capture. It is definitely more capable camera app, but also more difficult to use.

Both devices have excellent displays. Both are all, as screens made by Samsung, with great colors high pixel density, HDR capabilities and excellent outdoors visibility. There is a big size difference, of course, so I can't compare them much, but I will say that both are great displays. Surprisingly, the battery life is much better on the iPhone. Despite the s20 ultra has 2000 million power teach.

It has much larger screen, of course, but still I expected that it would add the very least match the iPhone. Overall, the battery life is a big strength on the 11pro and a bit of disappointment on the s20 ultra. Do sum up, I can say that both can shoot very nice Stills and video and I think that the users will be very happy with the output of both the main advantage of the s20 ultra is that 108 megapixel sensor? That is a real deal. It can capture extra details, and it provides the best image quality that I have ever seen from a smartphone. The zoom capabilities of the telephoto lens might also be very useful for some, although 53 millimeter fixed lines on the iPhone is completely fine by me, the iPhone is a better video camera and I like the processing.

More I, also slightly prefer ultra-wide camera on the iPhone stills quality from the main camera on the iPhone is very good, so I don't really have any major complaints. Overall, the s20 ultra will provide the best smartphone stills. If you are willing to sacrifice some video quality and also if you are willing to carry the route iPhone 11 Pro is jack-of-all-trades. It has very good and very balanced output from all three cameras and both Stills and video I, guess that which one should it should still depend mainly on whether you are Apple or Android user, but the camera set up on either won't disappoint. So that's it for this video.

Thank you for watching. I hope that you liked this video, and they found it to be useful, stay tuned for more videos and maybe consider subscribing. If you don't want to miss my future content. I appreciate your feedback. Informer stands up or thumbs down.

If you would like to ask anything or share your opinion, please do submit a comment section and see you next time.

Source : The Hybrid Shooter