Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Speed Test By TechNick

The Huawei Mate 40 pro is the world's first android smartphone to use five nanometer process, node technology within its Kira 9005g chipsets, but the Xiaomi mi 10 ultra is one of the best performing phones of the year with its seven nanometer, plus snapdragon 865 chips, so which one will come out on top in a speed test. Well, they both have eight gigs of LP ddr5 ram and UFS 3.1 storage. So it's pretty tough to say both of them have been updated to their latest available software. Android 10 on both devices over here and we do have both phones set to their max refresh rates, which is 90 hertz on the Huawei and 120 on the Xiaomi. We have the Huawei match to the Xiaomi resolution when it comes to standard resolution there of full HD plus, and we will be disabling all battery optimizations for the apps that we'll be using in the test, as well as turning off mini optimization on the Xiaomi device. So it doesn't affect ram management.

We're going to keep all animation scales, enabled on both devices here due to requests on my channel and enable performance mode on the mate of 40 pro round. One is going to be all about boot fingerprints and face unlock round. Two will be all about app speed and round. Three will be all about ram management using my fingers over here, so you're going to pop GoPro footage at the bottom left-hand corner for accuracy. This is technique and without further ado, let's go round one we're going to start with a simple boot to see which one can power up their device fastest.

It is indeed the meat 10 ultra with 17 seconds, as opposed to 21.5 seconds on the Huawei, giving the Xiaomi its first point in round one going into the actual device. However, the Huawei was faster at that getting at its first point and testing out the optical fingerprint sensors, underneath the displays of both screens over here, the Huawei Mate 40 pro was foster the first second and third time getting at its second point in round one when it comes to testing out the 3d facial recognition within the Huawei, as opposed to the 2d facial recognition on the Xiaomi, the Xiaomi was faster the first two times the Huawei was faster the last time, but the Huawei still got allocated the points. Rounding up round, one with two points. Apiece round, two making sure we hooked up to the same Wi-Fi network, max brightness and performance mode is still enabled on the Huawei, as well as all apps closed. In the background, the equality was slightly quicker to open up the settings app and slightly quicker to open up the calculator app.

The first two systems apps over here, the Huawei, had no sweat beating the Xiaomi over here with its 5 nanometer process. Note, as opposed to the seven nanometer plus in the Xiaomi device going into the camera app our next system app, the mate 40 pro opens it up quicker, but the Xiaomi switches to the selfie cam quicker, since even with master AI off the Huawei flips to the selfie camera and goes to portrait mode very strange. The Huawei actually took the snap quicker there, but the Xiaomi said it's a gallery quicker. So no point was allocated. The Huawei opened up the gallery app slightly quicker, but the Xiaomi kind of opened up the photo quicker loaded it quicker with the Huawei open it up quicker.

So no point was allocated over there going to photoshop express the Huawei was faster, but the mi 10 ultra open up the actual photo quicker and going to export this photo to our gallery. The Huawei was slightly quicker there. Now, I'm making it six points for the quality, as opposed to two points. For the, 10 ultra now triple the points for the Huawei Mate 40 pro as opposed to the mi 10 ultra, but remember the Xiaomi is slightly cheaper, and it is running on slightly older tech, that being 700 meters plus as opposed to five nanometer technology on the Huawei, will have to wait for the snapdragon 888 on the next Xiaomi device. Probably the 11 to see which one it can strike fastest that time around going into adobe rush.

The Huawei was faster at opening it and going into the project quicker and speeding through rendering quicker at 12 seconds, as opposed to 13 seconds on the Xiaomi 9 points on iguana, as opposed to two points on the 10 ultra going into Spotify was too close to call that time round and the next app is astral VPN, jumping into that one. The amid 10 ultra was slightly quicker. Picking up its third point now triple the points behind the Huawei. Huawei went even more ahead when turning on the VPN slightly faster than the Xiaomi going into Google Chrome strange thing here, the non google device, the mate 40 pro open. That would have quicker making 11 points as opposed to three on the Xiaomi and going into Facebook.

The Huawei now goes four times more points than the me10 ultra in round two very impressive from Huawei going into Instagram. Nothing has changed here. The Huawei grabs its 13th point now, 10 points ahead of the me10 ultra and going into twitter. It was too close to call between the two devices not focusing on the handles there, but more so how long it actually takes to open up the app, and it was pretty similar that time around going into YouTube. However, the mate 40 pro open this one up quicker.

Another google app needed 14 points as opposed to the three on the Xiaomi and searching for my profile. Since I can't log into my Google account on the Huawei device searching for that one, the Huawei actually opens it up quicker, but the Xiaomi loads it faster. So no point was allocated over there. We made 40 pro went into my profile slightly quicker, but the mi 10 ultra opened up a video started playing it quicker and loaded the whole page quicker as well. Now we can have four points on the Xiaomi, as opposed to 15 on the mate 40 pro, which is absolutely smashing it going into Netflix.

The Huawei was faster, but opening up my profile, the mi 10 ultra, was slightly quicker over there. Now five points for the Xiaomi, as opposed to 16 on the mate 40 pro still more than a 10 point lead for the Huawei and going into our first benchmark here, which is geek bench. The Huawei picks up at 17th point open it up quicker. Now we're going to speed through things by 3, 600 bottom right, hand, corner slow them back down, 2 minute 36.5 seconds on the Huawei, as opposed to 2 minutes 53.5 seconds on the Xiaomi getting the Huawei. It's 18 points here, as opposed to the five points on the Xiaomi, and you also got a single core and multi-core score only Huawei higher than that of the Xiaomi, but I must add not by that much next benchmark.

App here is a 3d mark, we're going to be running wildlife over here. The Huawei actually opened it up quicker, but the Xiaomi loaded, the page quicker. So no point was allocated now, jumping into the actual benchmark, speeded up bottom right-hand corner once again slowed it back down the Huawei. Did it in one minute 12.5 seconds, as opposed to one minute, 14.5 seconds on the Xiaomi and Xiaomi got 22.6 frames per second, as opposed to the 38.8 frames per second on the five nanometer Karin 9000 Huawei Mate 40 pro first game of four over here subway surfers, which one can open this up fastest. We do have 19 points in the Huawei so far as opposed to five points on the Xiaomi, so I don't think the Xiaomi will be able to catch up from this point, but the Huawei grabs its 20th point now, four times quicker than the mi 10 ultra in terms of points.

Picking up its next point within going into the first game of their second game is temple run two we're going to jump into this one, I'm going to speed it up a little, slow it back down and once again, the mate 40 pro grabs. Its next point, 21 points on the Huawei as opposed to five points on the Xiaomi. The mate 40 pro is absolutely destroying the mi 10 ultra but, like I said, the main 40 pro is quite a lot more expensive going to among us our next game. The mate 40 pro no surprise opened that one up quicker, but honestly, just a slight tad quicker and our last game here last app of the 20 pub g mobile going into this one spinning up bottom right, hand, corner and by the time we get to the main screen, not the actual video section. They made 40 product in 19 seconds, as opposed to 20 seconds.

As I said in this actual introduction video, I did not count in the second so 19 seconds, just one second slower on the 10 ultra with 20 seconds round.3 is all about ram management. Now remember I did disable mini optimization here, which many users have actually asked me to do, but the main 40 pro has now kept two apps open, where the Xiaomi has killed it. Now three apps: after going into photoshop now four apps after going into adobe rush, the Xiaomi just still has bad ram management, even when we disable battery optimizations for all of these apps, as well as disable mini optimizations. Underneath the developer options, I've tried multiple different ways, but the optimizations when it comes to ram on the metering ultra, even with the same amount of ram as the Huawei with 8 gigs and the same modules lpddr5 ram on both devices. The Huawei has still kept 11 apps open and those 11 exact apps, the mi 10 ultra has killed now 12 now 13 after going into temple, run 2 strange things here.

The 10 ultra actually kept the last two games open wrapping up round three with 13 on the Huawei as opposed to zero enemy, 10 ultra total score yeah 38 points for the mate 40 pro, as opposed to seven new me 10 ultra. I never thought I'd be saying that one, but if we just focused on raw speed, we got 23 points for the mate 40 pro. That is indeed in round two, as opposed to five on the mi 10. Ultra making the mate 40 pro at least five times quicker than the mi 10 ultra. I guess we're going to have to wait for the mi 11 with the snapdragon 888 processing trips to test it out against this Huawei monster hope that you guys enjoyed watching this video as much as I did.

Making it the subs to the channel would be fantastic. This is technic, and I'll, see you in the next one.

Source : TechNick