Vivo V17 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 8 - Speed Test By TechReason

Hey guys for serpents time to do a speed test between VIVO v17 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Note 8 counts with an Enos 88-90 5 processors, with the six gigs of RAM, while the VIVO v17 pro, on the other hand, comes with a snapdragon 675 chips with 8gb RAM, so very interesting to see dual cameras on the back on the note: 8 versus a quad camera on the VIVO V 17 pro. So let's get right into it. So starting off by booting, both phones up at the same time and Note 8 is little faster there and, let's see and VIVO v17 Pro comes with a 4100 mAh battery size, and you can see Samsung Galaxy Note 8 is faster there when it comes off booting up about 4 or 5. Second difference there now Bebop v70 Pro is also done note. It comes with a quad HD Super AMOLED display versus a full HD Super AMOLED display on the VIVO v17 pro little difference there not a huge difference when it comes up, booting up, and you can see, and the screen to body ratio incredible on the VIVO b-seventeen pro and everything is closed up in the background like office and the first application we have is the phone dialer and that is little faster on the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 v will be 70 pro followed by their settings, and that was about the same on both phones. Moving on with my clock and again that was about the same may be noted, it's just a tiny bit faster there with the animation so moving on with the calendar, and that is little faster on the VIVO b17 pro followed by denoted, my files that was about the same on both phones so moving on with some games' application.

So first we got is the Candy Crush saga and things like we will be 70 pro is done. Yes, it is faster than the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 sit down a bit faster there. So next up is the subway surfer, and you can see and the screen W ratio incredible on the VIVO b-17 pro with no, not no forehead, and you can see it's the last game application we have HD temper and two games after loading times is faster on the VIVO b-17 Pro, again faster on the five. B-17 pro and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 is almost done, and you can see about two or four-second difference: they're opening up the cameras- and that is little faster on the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, followed by the VIVO b-17 Pro. So, let's see the internet browsing speed.

I am using Samsung internet browser on the note, 8 versus a b-bow internet browser on the VIVO b-17 pro launching the Wikipedia dork on both phones same Wi-Fi network, and we will be 17 Pro. It's just a tiny bit faster. There I believe know what it is right behind, and you can see and scrolling with very smooth on both phones and faster as well on these devices. So next up is to YouTube. com, and we will be 17.

Po is just a tiny bit faster there. Maybe that was about the same on both phones. You guys are the judge of the speed test, and you can see so, let's check out the RAM measurement on these devices note it comes with a 6 GB RAM versus an 8 GB RAM on the VIVO b-seventeen pro phone dialer and the settings my clock Norah fresh. So far on the note eighth note, it is having an almost two-year-old phone: let's see the games again, no refresh subway surfer, nor refresh so far on the Nov 17 pro as well with the LAP ramp Opp, a 920 20s very bad in the remeasurement was the VIVO base empty Pro is performed very good in the Roman and over I had said that the absorbing speed is faster on the VIVO v70 Pro and the system based application faster on the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ravishment is incredible on both phones, not much a difference between HDPE ramp versus a 6gp time on the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and thank you so much for watching this speed test between VIVO b-seventeen provost is a Samsung Galaxy Note 8. Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below subscribe to my channel for daily tech videos.

Follow me on Facebook, Instagram and I will see you guys in my next video peace out.

Source : TechReason